- Author:
Young Hwii KO
1
;
Sung Kyu HONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Opinion
- From:Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2025;68(4):198-203
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
- Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) typically occurs in older adults and generally has a relatively long survival period, making it challenging to demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment. In 2012, medical guidelines recommending against PCa screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) became widespread, as randomized controlled trials had not consistently shown survival benefits.Current concepts: In South Korea, awareness of PCa has historically been very low, and the rate of PSA test screening has consequently been lower than that in other major developed countries. Additionally, PSA screening has tended to occur within a limited framework accessible only to individuals already aware of the test. Given that PCa is a high-risk cancer predominantly affecting older men in South Korea, unconditionally following medical guidelines from the 2010s that took a negative stance toward PSA screening may exacerbate health inequalities, increase metastatic cancer incidence, and elevate cancer-specific mortality, particularly in light of Korea’s rapidly aging population. Thus, recent shifts in clinical guidelines in the early 2020s, advocating the proactive implementation of PSA-based screening tests as announced by various countries, are significant. These shifts provide additional support for policy responses aligned with Korea’s epidemiological context. Discussion and conclusion: We advocate for increased public discourse on national PCa screening policies. Such policies should be rationally designed to reduce the incidence of high-risk PCa while minimizing the potential harms associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

