Validation of the Vietnamese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score questionnaire
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.3393/ac.2022.00514.0073
   		
        
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Tuong-Anh MAI-PHAN
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Vu Quang PHAM
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        			
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1. Department of General Surgery, Nhan dan Gia Dinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Original Article
 
        	
        	
            
            
            	- From:Annals of Coloproctology
	            		
	            		 2024;40(6):588-593
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryRepublic of Korea
 
            
            
            	- Language:English
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	 Purpose:The aim of this study was to validate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score questionnaire in the Vietnamese language among Vietnamese patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. 
				        	
				        
				        	Methods:The LARS score questionnaire was translated from English into Vietnamese and then back-translated as recommended internationally. From January 2018 to December 2020, 93 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery completed the Vietnamese version of the LARS score questionnaire together with an anchored question assessing the influence of bowel function on quality of life. To validate test-retest reliability, patients were requested to answer the LARS score questionnaire twice. 
				        	
				        
				        	Results:Ninety-three patients completed the LARS score questionnaire, of whom 89 responded twice. The patients who responded twice were included in the analysis of test-retest reliability. Fifty-eight patients had a “major” LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who were obese and those who were not (P<0.001) and between the LAR and AR procedures (P<0.001). Age and sex were not associated with higher LARS scores (P=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the quality of life category question and the LARS score in 56.2% of cases, and a moderate fit was found in 42.7% of cases, showing reasonable convergent validity. The test-retest reliability of 89 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient. 
				        	
				        
				        	Conclusion:The Vietnamese version of the LARS score questionnaire is a valid tool for measuring LARS.