Application of Transverse Process Hooks at Distal Thoracic Vertebrae in Uppermost Vertebral Instrumentation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Special Focus on Delayed-Onset Neurologic Deficits
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sun-Joon YOO
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hyun-Jun JANG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Bong Ju MOON
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jeong-Yoon PARK
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sung Uk KUH
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Dong-Kyu CHIN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Keun-Su KIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jun Jae SHIN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yoon HA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Kyung-Hyun KIM
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - From: Neurospine 2024;21(4):1219-1229
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	 Objective:We aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset neurological deficits (DONDs), DOND-related reoperation rates following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and efficacy of transverse process hooks (TPHs) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) compared to pedicle screws (PSs). 
				        	
Methods:We included 90 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented fusion from the sacrum to the distal thoracic spine for ASD, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between 33 patients in the TPH group and 57 patients in the PS group, using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22), Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and various spinal sagittal parameters.
Results:While absent in the TPH group, myelopathy occurred in 15.8% of the PS group, wherein 15 patients underwent reoperation. The change in the proximal junctional angle, from the pre- to postoperative assessment, was lower in the TPH group than in the PS group (0.2 vs. 6.6, p=0.002). Postoperative facet degeneration in the PS group progressed more significantly than in the TPH group (0.5 vs. 0.1, p=0.002). Surgical outcomes were comparable for both groups, except for the back visual analogue scale (3.5 vs. 4.1, p=0.010) and SRS-22 domains, including pain and satisfaction (3.3 vs. 2.9, p=0.033; 3.7 vs. 3.3, p=0.041). No intergroup difference was observed in SF-36.
Conclusion:Using TPHs at the UIV level can prevent DOND, and thereby prevent postoperative myelopathy that necessitates reoperation; thus, TPHs is preferable over PSs in ASD surgery. 
            