Construction of the research questions and topic selection evaluation index system of Guideline for Topic Selection for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process
- VernacularTitle:基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建《药品临床综合评价主题遴选指南》研究问题及主题遴选评估指标体系
- Author:
Rong DUAN
1
;
Zhengxiang LI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy,Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,300052,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs;
topic selection;
research question;
index system;
Delphi method
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(7):789-793
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To construct the research questions and topic selection evaluation index system of the Guideline for Topic Selection for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs (hereinafter referred to as the Guideline), so as to provide the basis for the formulation of the Guideline. METHODS Through literature research, an expert questionnaire on the research questions and evaluation index system of the Guideline was initially constructed. Experts were selected according to relevant requirements of the guideline formulation and Delphi method; the research questions and evaluation indicators of the Guideline were screened by electronic questionnaire communication, and the weights of evaluation index system of topic selection were assigned by the analytic hierarchy process. RESULTS Five research questions of the Guideline were constructed, including the organization and management of theme selection, evaluation process, evaluation methods, evaluation index system, and index weight assignment. And a theme selection and evaluation index system, including 5 primary indexes, 9 secondary indexes and 17 tertiary indexes, was constructed. Kendall coefficients of the research questions and all indexes were >0.4, and the P values of χ2 test were<0.05, which meant the evaluation results were consistent. The weights of all levels of the evaluation index system were assigned by analytic hierarchy process with consistency ratio of 0.007 6 (<0.1), and the model matrix passed the consistency test. CONCLUSIONS The research questions and topic selection evaluation index system of the Guideline established in this study are highly authoritative, scientific and reliable, which lay a foundation for the standardization of the Guideline.