Expression of PICK1 in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical significance
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20240723-00365
- VernacularTitle:PICK1在肝细胞癌中的表达及其临床意义
- Author:
Wenhua CHENG
1
;
Jingmei LIU
;
Wenhui YANG
Author Information
1. 山西省肿瘤医院 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院消化内科，太原 030013
- Keywords:
Carcinoma, hepatocellular;
Genes, PICK1;
Prognosis
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2024;36(11):824-828
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the expression of PICK1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its clinical significance.Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. Cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues (1cm from the edge of cancer tissues) were collected from 30 HCC patients undergoing surgical resection in Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from August 2020 to April 2023. The relative expression level of PICK1 mRNA in 30 fresh HCC samples was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The clinicopathological data from 132 HCC patients undergoing surgical resection in Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to November 2018 were collected. Meanwhile, paraffin specimens were collected from cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues, and relative expression level of PICK1 protein was detected by using immunohistochemistry method. According to the PICK1 protein expression, 132 HCC patients were divided into the low expression group (immunohistochemistry scores < 3 points) and the high expression group (immunohistochemistry scores ≥ 3 points). Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the 2 groups, and log-rank test was also performed.Results:The result of qRT-PCR showed that the relative expression level of PICK1 mRNA in fresh cancer tissues of 30 HCC patients was lower than that in corresponding paracancerous tissues (0.43±0.38 vs. 1.10±0.12), and the difference was statistically significant ( t = -13.66, P < 0.001). Among 132 HCC patients, 86 (65.2%) cases had PICK1 protein low expression and 46 (34.8%) cases had PICK1 protein high expression; among the corresponding paracancerous tissues, 37 (28.0%) tissues had PICK1 protein low expression and 95 (72.0%) tissues had PICK1 protein low expression. The high expression rate of PICK1 protein in HCC tissues was lower than that in paracancerous tissues, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 35.07, P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in PICK1 protein expression level of HCC patients with different tumor diameter, tumor number, tumor type, TNM staging, encapsulation or not and vascular invasion (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the median OS time was 54.9 months (95% CI: 41.0 months-not reached) and 17.8 months (95% CI: 13.1-25.0 months), respectively in the PICK1 high expression group and the PICK1 low expression group after surgery; and the OS in the PICK1 high expression group was better than that in the the PICK1 low expression group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). The median DFS time was 43.0 months (95% CI: 31.0 months-not reached), 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.1 months-20.1months), respectively in the PICK1 high expression group and the PICK1 low expression group; and the DFS in the PICK1 high expression group was better than that in the PICK1 low expression group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Conclusions:PICK1 is lowly expressed in HCC tissues, and HCC patients with PICK1 low expression have poor prognosis.
