Comparison of effect of MRI or ultrasound-guided HIFU ablation in the treatment of uterine fibroids
10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20240507-00150
- VernacularTitle:MRI或超声引导下高强度聚焦超声消融治疗子宫肌瘤的效果比较
- Author:
Jingjing LIU
1
;
Xiaojun HU
;
Xiaolin YE
Author Information
1. 陕西省西安市人民医院 西安市第四医院妇产科，西安 710000
- Keywords:
Uterine fibroids;
High intensity focused ultrasound ablation;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Ultrasound examination;
Ovarian function
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2024;40(5):351-356
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in the treatment of uterine fibroids.Methods:The clinical data of 124 patients with uterine fibroids who received HIFU ablation in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Xi'an People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed from April 2020 to February 2023. The patients were divided into an MRI group (58 cases treated with magnetic resonance guided HIFU ablation) and an ultrasound group (66 cases treated with ultrasound guided HIFU ablation) according to different guidance methods. The treatment effects (total effective rate, fibroid ablation volume, fibroid ablation rate), surgical conditions (total energy consumption, total time consumption, energy efficiency factor, irradiation time), incidence of adverse events, ovarian function (follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), inhibin) at 3 months before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. B. Antral follicle count (AFC) and recurrence at 6 and 12 months after surgery. The t-test is used for comparing between groups of metric data that conform to normal distribution, and the chi square test is used for comparing between groups of count data.Results:The total energy consumption, total time consumption and irradiation time in MRI group were longer than those in ultrasound group( (571.68±184.31) kJ vs (494.82±155.03) kJ, (186.21±36.19) min vs (121.63±31.09) min, (26.12±7.93) min vs (22.07±7.46) min), there were have statistical differences( t values were 2.52, 10.69, and 2.93, respectively; P values were 0.013, <0.001, and 0.004, respectively). At 3 months after surgery, the level of FSH in the two groups was risen than that before surgery(MRI group (10.27±1.72) U/L vs (8.67±1.63) U/L, ultrasound group (10.13±1.66) U/L vs (8.46±1.57) U/L), the level of INHB and the number of AFC were declined (MRI group (40.46±5.31) ng/L vs (47.19±4.24) ng/L, (4.22±1.21) vs (6.72±1.48); ultrasound group (39.07±5.12) ng/L vs (48.20±4.77) ng/L, (4.11±1.09) vs (6.63±1.41)) there were have statistical differences ( t values were 5.14, 5.94, 7.54, 9.96, 10.60, and 11.48, respectively; all P<0.001). Conclusion:Both methods of guided HIFU ablation for uterine fibroids can effectively ablate fibroids and improve ovarian function, with safety. Ultrasound guidance has a shorter treatment time and less energy consumption compared to MRI guidance.
