Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion between transforaminal approach and transarticular outburst approach
10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2024.04.02
- VernacularTitle:经椎间孔入路与经关节突入路脊柱内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的疗效与安全性比较
- Author:
Zihao CHEN
1
;
Jianwen DONG
;
Zhongyu LIU
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第三医院 广东省微创脊柱外科质量控制中心 广东省微创脊柱外科工程技术研究中心 510630 广州市
- Keywords:
Lumbar interbody fusion;
Endoscopy;
Transforaminal approach;
Transfacet approach
- From:
Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
2024;34(4):339-347
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of uni-portal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion by using larger-diameter endoscope for single-level lumbar disease via transforaminal approach versus transfacet approach.Methods:46 patients underwent single-level uni-portal endoscopic lumbar interbody fu-sion from June 2018 to February 2022 were enrolled.18 of the patients were male and 28 were female.The mean age was 60.9±10.5 years old(40-80 years).The follow-up time was 3-47 months.Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach,18 of which were included in the transforaminal group,and the remaining 28 were included in the transfacet group,and a full spinal endoscope of 7.1mm inner-di-ameter working-channel was applied to all the patients.The clinical result was evaluated before surgery,at 3d after surgery and the final follow-up,by Oswestry disability index(ODI),visual analogue scale(VAS)for back pain and leg pain,and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JO A)score.The decompression and implant were evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray plain film and lumbar CT at 3d after operation.Bridwell criteria were used to evaluate the fusion rate based on CT images for patients followed up for more than 6 months after surgery.Results:No significant differences were found in age,gender,diagnosis,preoperative in-tervertebral height,surgical segment,preoperative ODI,VAS and JOA score between the two groups(P＞0.05).72.2％of the patients in transforaminal group complained unilateral radicular symptom,while 64.3％of the patients in transfacet group suffered from bilateral radicular symptoms(P=0.020).The average operation time was 327.7±89.9min in the transforaminal group,significantly longer than the 385.9±96.7min in the transfacet group(P=0.047),and the mean length of hospital stay in the transforaminal group was 14.8±6.0d,shorter than that of 19.5±7.8d in the transfacet group(P=0.038).75％of the patients in transfacet group underwent unilater-al laminotomy with bilateral spinal canal decompression(ULBD).The ODI scores,back and leg pain VAS scores and JOA score were significantly improved postoperatively and at the final follow-up in both groups(P＜0.05),while no statistical differences between groups(P＞0.05).Postoperative intervertebral height significantly increased in both group(P＜0.001),but no statistical difference was found between groups(P＞0.05).The compli-cation rate was comparable between two groups,without severe intraoperative or postoperative complication.A-mong the 21 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months and received CT examinations,20(95.2％)presented bony fusion at surgical segment,and there was no statistical difference between the two groups in fusion rate.Conclusions:Both the transforaminal approach and the transarticular protrusion ap-proach are safe and effective for the single-level lumbar interbody fusion under single-hole coaxial large channel endoscopy,and the transforaminal approach results in shorter operation time and shorter hospital stay.
