Clinical efficacy comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and conventional surgery for pancreatic ductal stones
10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20230712-00096
- VernacularTitle:经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影取石术与传统术式治疗胰管结石的临床疗效比较
- Author:
Zhengrong OU
1
;
An YAN
;
Cheng PENG
;
Weidong ZHU
;
Xiao YU
Author Information
1. 湖南师范大学附属岳阳医院普外二科，岳阳 414000
- Keywords:
Pancreatic stone;
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;
Endoscopic lithotomy;
Surgical procedures, operative;
Laparoscopic lithotomy;
Clinical ef
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
2024;24(3):199-204
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of transendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) lithotripsy with that of traditional surgical procedures in the treatment of pancreatic ductal stones.Methods:The clinical data of 47 patients with chronic pancreatitis combined with pancreatic duct stones hospitalized in Yueyang Hospital affiliated to Hunan Normal University and Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between November 2017 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into ERCP group ( n=19), laparoscopic group ( n=10) and open abdominal group ( n=18) according to the mode of surgical treatment for pancreatic stone, and the general clinical characteristics, the surgical and postoperative recovery indicators, pain level grading, one-stage stone removal rate, complication rate and evaluation of pancreatic function were compared among the three groups. Results:The age, gender, body mass index, etiology, duration of disease, symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea), stone location, stone size, preoperative tumor markers (CEA, AFP, CA19-9) and serum inflammatory factor (CRP) level were not statistically significant among three groups. In ERCP group, the operation time (1.47±0.51) h, the time of the first postoperative intestinal ventilation (1.16±0.20) days, the time of drainage removal (8.68±3.30) days, the length of hospitalization (11.37±4.59) days and intraoperative blood loss (109.5±16.5) ml, the CRP on the first postoperative day (11.24±2.62) mg/L, and the treatment cost (35 238±10 663) were obviously shorter or lower than those of laparoscopic and open abdominal group; in the laparoscopic group, the time to first postoperative bowel ventilation (2.40±0.70) days, drainage removal time (12.10±5.36) days and intraoperative blood loss (195.0±83.2) ml, postoperative CRP on day one (14.52±3.62) mg/L, and the treatment cost (69 908±11 310) were greatly shorter or lower than those in open abdominal group; and all the differences were statistically significant (all P value <0.05). Those with moderate and severe pain in ERCP group (10.53%) were lower than those in laparoscopic group (70.00%) and open abdominal group (83.38%), and the difference was statistically significant (all P value <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between ERCP group and laparoscopic and open abdominal group in terms of phase I stone removal rate, complication rate, and postoperative glycated haemoglobin level, but patients' weight loss (26.32%) and incidence of diarrhea (21.05%) were lower than those of laparoscopic and open abdominal group, and all the difference was statistically significant (all P value <0.05). Conclusions:ERCP lithotripsy is an effective, safe, minimally invasive and economical treatment for pancreatic duct stone and is suitable for most patients with pancreatic duct stone, but patients with embedded or complex pancreatic duct stones should be treated with laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery according to the actual situation.
