Compare the differences of PICC catheter heterotopias in the traditional turning neck method with finger-pressing method

VernacularTitle:传统转颈法和指压法防治PICC导管异位的效果对比
Author: Hua LU ¹ ; Wei WANG ; Jia YE ; Weina GUO
Author Information

1. 830001 乌鲁木齐，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院放疗二科
Keywords: PICC; Traditional turning neck method; Finger-pressing method; Catheter heterotopias
From: Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2016;22(4):575-577
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of PICC catheter heterotopias in the traditional turning neck method with finger-pressing method. Methods From October 2010 to October 2014, 596 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 296 cases in observation group using traditional turning neck method, and the other 300 patients in control group using finger-pressing method. We compared the differences between these two groups by the operation time for subclavian vena to brachiocephalica and rate of ectopic catheter tip. Results The incidences of ectopic catheter tip were 15. 00% and 5. 41% in control group and observation group, which was lower in observation group comparing with control group (χ2 =14. 929, P <0. 05). The operation time was (16.94±3.03)sand(7.24±4.70)sincontrolgroupandobservationgroup(t=29.900,P<0.01). Conclusions Finger-pressing method decreases the rate of ectopic catheter tip and operation time of PICC catheter technique.