Evaluation of the results of surgical revision of nasofacial deformities secondary to fractures of the frontal process of the maxilla
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20221014-00317
- VernacularTitle:上颌骨额突区骨折继发鼻面部畸形手术整复效果评估
- Author:
Zhongying WANG
1
;
Dong CHEN
;
Tao WANG
;
Zhou XU
;
Peihua WANG
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 上海交通大学医学院耳科学研究所 上海市耳鼻疾病转化医学重点实验室，上海 200011
- Keywords:
Maxillary fractures;
Nasal and facial deformity;
Nasal airway obstruction;
Acoustic rhinometry;
Nasal resistance;
Reconstructive surgical procedures
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2023;39(7):730-736
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effect of surgical revision of nasofacial deformity secondary to maxillary frontal process fracture.Methods:The clinical data of patients with nasofacial deformities secondary to maxillary frontal process fractures who underwent surgery in the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The nasofacial deformity was surgically treated by open reduction with internal fixation, nasal septum correction, and reconstruction of orbital wall fracture. Three months after surgery, the surgical results were evaluated from the following three aspects. (1) Nasofacial morphology, which was evaluated by two doctors and the patient, and was classified into 3 levels: very satisfied, satisfied, and unsatisfied. (2) Objective assessment of nasal ventilation function, which was measured by nasal acoustic rhinometry and nasal resistance detection, including measurements of nasal minimum cross-sectional area (MCA), nasal volume 7 cm from the anterior nostril (NV), total nasal inspiratory resistance (TRi) and total nasal expiratory resistance (TRe). To eliminate the differences caused by swelling of the nasal mucosa, the patients were divided into 3 groups of <7 d, 7-14 d, and >14 d according to the time from trauma to preoperative examination for pre- and post-operative comparisons, respectively. (3) Subjective assessment of nasal ventilation function was performed using the nasal obstructive symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale, with a total score of 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating more severe nasal obstruction symptoms. The SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and the measurement data were expressed as Mean±SD. A paired t-test was used to compare the preoperative and 3-month postoperative data, with P<0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference. Results:A total of 83 patients were included, 53 males and 30 females, aged 7 to 78 years, with a median of 35 years. All patients underwent successful surgery, and all soft tissue incisions healed well after surgery with improved nasofacial morphology. Three months after surgery, the physicians were very satisfied and satisfied with the nasofacial morphology in 49 (59%) and 34 (41%) patients, respectively, and patients were very satisfied, satisfied, and unsatisfied in 51 (61%), 29 (35%), and 3(4%) cases, respectively. Before surgery, the <7 d group (14 cases), 7-14 d group (28 cases), and >14 d group (41 cases) had MCA values of (0.43±0.10) cm 2, (0.51±0.15) cm 2, and (0.50±0.14) cm 2; NV values of (9.76±2.20) cm 3, (12.40±4.15) cm 3, and (12.40±3.87) cm 3; TRi values of (1.93±0.28) kPa·L -1·s -1, (1.96±0.24) kPa·L -1·s -1, and (1.96±0.23) kPa·L -1·s -1; TRe values of (2.02±0.35) kPa·L -1·s -1, (2.08±0.38) kPa·L -1·s -1, and (2.08±0.34) kPa·L -1·s -1, respectively. Three months after surgery, in the three groups, the MCA values were (0.48±0.08) cm 2, (0.56±0.15) cm 2, and (0.56±0.14) cm 2; the NV values were (11.56±2.49) cm 3, (14.40±4.50) cm 3, and (14.41±4.24) cm 3; the TRi values were (1.74±0.19) kPa·L -1·s -1, (1.78±0.15) kPa·L -1·s -1, (1.78±0.14) kPa·L -1·s -1; the TRe values were (1.73±0.24) kPa·L -1·s -1, (1.79±0.24) kPa·L -1·s -1, and (1.79±0.22) kPa·L -1·s -1, respectively. In all three groups, the MCA and NV values at 3 months postoperatively were greater than the preoperative values of MCA and NV (all P < 0.01), and the TRe and TRi values at 3 months postoperatively were less than those preoperative values (all P < 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, the NOSE scale score was (4.1±1.2)points, which was significantly lower than the preoperative score of NOSE scale score[(10.5±1.8)points] ( P<0.01). Conclusion:The combination of objective and subjective assessment method can help the surgeon to accurately determine the nasofacial morphological and functional defects caused by the fracture of the maxillary frontal process area before surgery and to formulate a perfect surgical plan. The patients’ nasofacial appearance and nasal ventilation functions were significantly improved after the fracture revision surgery.
