Comparing 11 early warning scores and three shock indices in early sepsis prediction in the emergency department
10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.052
- Author:
Rex Pui Kin Lam
1
;
Dai ZONGLIN
;
Eric Ho Yin Lau
;
Carrie Yuen Ting Ip
;
Chan Ching HO
;
Zhao LINGYUN
;
Tsang Chi TAT
;
Matthew Sik Hon Tsui
;
Rainer Hudson TIMOTHY
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine
- Keywords:
Sepsis;
Emergency department;
Clinical prediction rule;
Early warning score;
Shock index
- From:
World Journal of Emergency Medicine
2024;15(4):273-282
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:This study aimed to evaluate the discriminatory performance of 11 vital sign-based early warning scores(EWSs)and three shock indices in early sepsis prediction in the emergency department(ED). METHODS:We performed a retrospective study on consecutive adult patients with an infection over 3 months in a public ED in Hong Kong.The primary outcome was sepsis(Sepsis-3 definition)within 48 h of ED presentation.Using c-statistics and the DeLong test,we compared 11 EWSs,including the National Early Warning Score 2(NEWS2),Modified Early Warning Score,and Worthing Physiological Scoring System(WPS),etc.,and three shock indices(the shock index[SI],modified shock index[MSI],and diastolic shock index[DSI]),with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome(SIRS)and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(qSOFA)in predicting the primary outcome,intensive care unit admission,and mortality at different time points. RESULTS:We analyzed 601 patients,of whom 166(27.6%)developed sepsis.NEWS2 had the highest point estimate(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve[AUROC]0.75,95%CI 0.70-0.79)and was significantly better than SIRS,qSOFA,other EWSs and shock indices,except WPS,at predicting the primary outcome.However,the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NEWS2≥5 for the prediction of sepsis were 0.45(95%CI 0.37-0.52)and 0.88(95%CI 0.85-0.91),respectively.The discriminatory performance of all EWSs and shock indices declined when used to predict mortality at a more remote time point. CONCLUSION:NEWS2 compared favorably with other EWSs and shock indices in early sepsis prediction but its low sensitivity at the usual cut-off point requires further modification for sepsis screening.
