Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Pakanat DECHARATANACHART
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Wirichada PAN-NGUM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Thoetchai PEERAPHATDIT
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Natthaporn TANPOWPONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Pisit TANGKIJVANICH
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sombat TREEPRASERTSUK
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Rungsun RERKNIMITR
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Roongruedee CHAITEERAKIJ
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - From:Gut and Liver 2024;18(1):135-146
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	 Background/Aims:Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference. 
				        	
Methods:Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States.
Results:aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness.The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio.
Conclusions:Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks. 
            