Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the puerperium
10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20230728-000256
- VernacularTitle:产褥期颅内静脉窦血栓形成的危险因素分析
- Author:
Haoran LI
1
;
Chenxi ZHANG
;
Ping HAN
;
Hua JIANG
;
Dan WANG
;
Yuehong SUN
;
Xiao LI
;
Limin ZHANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院实验诊断中心 北京市免疫试剂临床工程技术研究中心 国家药监局体外诊断试剂质量控制重点实验室，北京 100070
- Keywords:
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis;
Puerperium;
Coagulation
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2023;39(6):447-452
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the risk factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) during puerperal period.Methods:This study was a restrospective analysis, A total of 33 puerperal CVST patients admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2016 to November 2022 were selected as the observation group, and 61 puerperal healthy women who underwent postpartum follow-up at the same period in the hospital were selected as the control group. The age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, hypertension history, diabetes history, drug use history and mode of delivery or abortion of the two groups of women were compared and collected, as well as the level of laboratory indicators. The risk factors of CVST in puerperal period were analyzed. The measurement data of normal distribution were represented by two independent samples t test for comparison between groups. The measurement data of non-normal distribution were expressed as M ( Q1, Q3), and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison between groups. The count data is expressed as number (%), and the comparison between groups is performed using χ 2 test or Fisher exact probability method. Logistic regression model was established to analyze the risk factors of CVST in puerperal period. Results:BMI, serum LDH, α-HBDH, fasting blood glucose, HCY levels, WBC, NEU, NLR, RDW and MPV in observation group were higher than those in control group [(30.21±4.25) kg/m 2 vs (21.94±3.02) kg/m 2]. 195.15(183.10,240.98) U/L vs 165.75(154.55,184.62) U/L, 166.60(143.10,188.60) U/L vs 124.10(116.30,137.90) U/L, (4.88 ± 0.98) vs (4.25±0.41), 8.35 (7.10, 12.16) μmol/L vs 6.60 (5.30, 7.58) μmol/L, 9.26 (6.56, 11.76) × 10 9/L vs 7.25 (6.23, 8.00) × 10 9/L, and 7.18 (4.66, 8.79) × 10 9/L vs 3.93 (3.25, 4.52) × 10 9/L, 4.13 (2.27,6.55) vs 1.63 (1.16,1.97), 42.80(38.95,47.45) fL vs 40.70(38.95,42.60) fL, (9.52±0.99) fL vs 8.96±0.88 fL], LY and PDW were lower than control group [1.58(1.11,1,96)×10 9/L vs 2.50(2.04,2.91)×10 9/L, 15.60(11.65,16.20) fL vs 16.00(15.80,16.30) fL]. The differences were statistically significant ( t=4.58, P<0.001; Z=4.54, P<0.001; Z=5.56, P<0.001; t=3.38, P=0.002; Z=4.18, P<0.001; Z=3.39, P=0.001; Z=4.92, P<0.001; Z=4.92, P<0.001; Z=4.54, P<0.001; Z=5.56, P<0.001; Z=4.18, P<0.001; Z=4.92, P<0.001; Z=5.87, P<0.001; Z=2.18, P=0.029; t=2.82, P=0.006; Z=4.78, P<0.001; Z=2.52, P=0.012). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that NEU, HCY and α-HBDH were risk factors for puerparal CVST (odds ratios were 3.07, 1.53 and 1.07, respectively, 95% confidence interval: 1.65~5.71, 1.09~2.15, 1.02~1.12, P values were <0.001, 0.014, 0.007, respectively). Conclusions:α-HBDH, HCY and NEU are independent risk factors for puerperal CVST.
