Comparison of the clinical curative effects between wire-to-port drainage and put-aside drainage after incision and hanging on perianal abscess
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230425-00438
- VernacularTitle:比较切开挂线对口引流术与切开挂线旷置引流术治疗肛周脓肿的疗效观察
- Author:
Lei HE
1
;
Shuai SHAO
;
Bo JIANG
Author Information
1. 安庆市立医院肛肠科（中西医结合），安庆 246003
- Keywords:
Abscess;
Perianal region;
Incision and hanging wire-to-port drainage;
Incision and hanging put-aside drainage;
Clinical curative effect
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2024;47(1):53-57
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the clinical curative effects of wire-to-port drainage and put-aside drainage after incision and hanging on perianal abscess.Methods:Eighty-two patients with perianal abscess admitted to Anqing Municipal Hospital between November 2019 and November 2022 were enrolled. The patients were divided into group A (41 cases, incision and hanging wire-to-port drainage) and group B (41 cases, incision and hanging put-aside drainage) by random digits table method. The clinical curative effect, operation time, wound healing time, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization time in the two groups were compared. The pain and anal function were evaluated by visual analogue score (VAS) and Wexner continence grading score (Wexner score) before surgery and 1, 7 d after surgery. The occurrence of complications within 1 month after surgery was statistically analyzed.Results:There was no significant difference in total clinical response rate between group A and group B ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The wound healing time, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization time in group A were significantly shorter than those in group B: (21.34 ± 2.21) d vs. (27.86 ± 2.84) d, (23.12 ± 2.42) d vs. (28.36 ± 2.91) d, (8.12 ± 0.83) d vs. (13.25 ± 1.47), P<0.05. At 1 and 7 d after surgery, the VAS and Wexner score in group A were lower than those in group B: (6.11 ± 0.62) points vs. (6.54 ± 0.67) points, (2.39 ± 0.25) points vs. (3.21 ± 0.33) points, (7.54 ± 0.77) points vs. (8.96 ± 0.91) points, (4.22 ± 0.43) points vs. (5.68 ± 0.58) points, P<0.05. There was no significant difference in total incidence of complications between the two groups within 1 month after surgery ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with incision and hanging put-aside drainage, incision and hanging wire-to-port drainage can promote wound healing, shorten hospitalization time, relieve postoperative pain and improve anal function in patients with perianal abscess, with certain safety.
