Comparison study of clinical efficacy and safety of different embolization materials in preoperative interventional embolization for spinal tumors
10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2023.12.005
- VernacularTitle:不同栓塞材料在脊柱肿瘤术前介入栓塞中疗效和安全性比较研究
- Author:
Shenggan LIN
1
;
Zhuoyang FAN
;
Wei ZHANG
;
Zhenyu XU
;
Rong LIU
;
Sheng QIAN
Author Information
1. 361015 福建厦门 复旦大学附属中山医院厦门医院介入治疗科;厦门市恶性肿瘤综合治疗临床医学研究中心
- Keywords:
spinal tumor;
interventional embolization;
gelatin sponge;
spring coil;
bleeding volume
- From:
Journal of Interventional Radiology
2023;32(12):1184-1189
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of gelatin sponge particles,gelatin sponge strips,and spring coil combined with gelatin sponge particles in preoperative interventional embolization for spinal tumors.Methods The clinical data of a total of 92 patients with spinal tumor,who received preoperative interventional embolization before spinal tumor surgery at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital and Xiamen Branch of Fudan University of China between June 2012 and June 2022,were collected.According to the different embolization materials used during the interventional embolization,the patients were divided into gelatin sponge particle group(ni=36),gelatin sponge strip group(n=36),and spring coil plus gelatin sponge particle group(n=20).Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to compare the intraoperative bleeding volume among the three groups,and Fisher's exact probability testing was used to compare the incidence of complications among the three groups.Results Successful surgical resection of the spinal tumor was accomplished in all patients.The median intraoperative bleeding volumes in gelatin sponge particle group,gelatin sponge strip group,and spring coil plus gelatin sponge particle group were 400 mL(200-950 mL),1 000 mL(513-2000 mL),and 1000 mL(500-1350 mL)respectively.The intraoperative bleeding volume in the gelatin sponge particle group was significantly smaller than that in the gelatin sponge strip group(P=0.000 8)and in the spring coil plus gelatin sponge particle group(P=0.002 7),the differences were statistically significant.After operation,4 patients in the gelatin sponge particle group developed incision infection or local abscess formation,one patient in the gelatin sponge strip group developed incision dehiscence,and one patient in the spring coil plus gelatin sponge particle group had postoperative local hematoma at the incision site.No statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications existed between each other among the three groups(all P＞0.05).Conclusion For interventional embolization of spinal tumor,all of the gelatin sponge particles,gelatin sponge strips,and spring coils are clinically safe and effective.However,in reducing the amount of blood loss during surgery the superselective catheterization with embolization of tumor-feeding arteries using gelatin sponge particles is superior to the non-superselective catheterization with embolization of tumor-feeding arteries using gelatin sponge strips or combination use of gelatin sponge particles and spring coils.(J Intervent Radiol,2023,32:1184-1189)
