Rapid health technology assessment of zanubrutinib in the treatment of B cell lymphomas
- VernacularTitle:泽布替尼治疗B细胞淋巴瘤的快速卫生技术评估
- Author:
Zhen FENG
1
;
Ran LAI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University，Jiangsu Xuzhou 221004，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
zanubrutinib;
rapid health technology assessment;
chronic lymphocytic leukemia;
small lymphocytic lymphoma
- From:
China Pharmacy
2024;35(7):848-852
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To rapidly assess the efficacy， safety and cost-effectiveness of novel highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase （BTK） inhibitor zanubrutinib in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia （CLL）， small lymphocytic lymphoma （SLL） and mantle cell lymphoma （MCL）. METHODS Retrieved from PubMed， Cochrane Library， CNKI， Wanfang database， VIP， and health technology assessment （HTA） websites， systematic reviews/meta-analyses， randomized controlled trials （RCTs）， pharmacoeconomic studies and HTA reports related to zanubrutinib were collected from the database/website establishment to July 2023. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria， and its quality was assessed by using relevant evaluation tools. Data extraction was presented by qualitative description. RESULTS A total of 5 literature were included， comprising of 3 RCTs and 2 cost-effectiveness analyses. In terms of efficacy， compared with the control group， zanubrutinib treatment resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival （P＜0.05） and a higher overall response rate （P＜0.05）. However， there was no statistical significance in overall survival between 2 groups （P＞0.05）. In terms of safety， zanubrutinib had lower incidence of cardiac adverse events， incidence of major bleeding events， and drug discontinuation rate due to adverse drug events， compared to first-generation BTK inhibitors ibrutinib； but the risk of bleeding events caused by zanubrutinib was still higher， compared to traditional chemoimmunotherapy （bendamotine+rituximab）. In terms of cost-effectiveness， zanubrutinib was found to be cost-effective in the treatment of recurrent or refractory MCL， compared to ibrutinib. CONCLUSIONS Zanubrutinib demonstrates sound efficacy and safety in patients with CLL/SLL and MCL patients. Furthermore， it exhibits economic advantages for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.
