Biograph Vision 600 PET performance testing and analysis
10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2023.06.013
- VernacularTitle:Biograph Vision 600 PET性能测试与分析
- Author:
Honglei LI
1
;
Qun WANG
2
;
Sen YANG
1
;
Jie LIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029 China.
2. Department of radiology, Guang 'anmen Hospital, Beijing 100053 China.
- Publication Type:OriginalArticles
- Keywords:
Positron emission computed tomography;
NEMA;
Performance test;
Quality control;
Time of flight
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
2023;32(6):668-672
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To test and analyze the performance of Biograph Vision 600 PET/CT according to the NEMA NU2—2012 standard to achieve reliable, repeatable, and inter-system comparable performance measurement, and to provide a basis for future equipment stability testing and status detection. Methods The Biograph Vision PET equipment features a detector based on silicon photomultipliers, with 3.2 mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals and full cover of the scintillation region. The spatial resolution, sensitivity, noise-equivalent count rate, scatter fraction, coincidence count rate, image quality, scatter correction, and time-of-flight resolution of Biograph Vision PET were tested by referring to the test model and method of the NEMA NU2—2012 standard. Results The Biograph Vision 600 PET equipment showed lateral and axial spatial resolutions of 3.69 mm and 3.81 mm at 1 cm off-center of the field of view, respectively and of 4.29 mm and 4.48 mm at 10 cm, respectively. The sensitivity was 17.5 kcps/MBq. The time-of-flight resolution changed from 210 ps to 215 ps as the count rate increased to the peak noise equivalent count rate. The NEMA peak noise-equivalent count rate was 247 kcps at 30.3 kBq/ml. The corresponding scatter fraction was 34.8%. With the NEMA module, the overall image quality contrast range was 73.6%-92.8%, and the background variability was 2.3%-6.5%; the mean lung residual error was 3.4%; and the time-of-flight resolution was 210 ps. Conclusion This performance test was performed according to the NEMA NU2—2012 standard, showing that all parameters were better than the ex-factory standard, which can provide a reference for other institutions selecting equipment and also provide a basis for future equipment stability testing and status detection.
