Proximal Junctional Failure after Corrective Surgery: Focusing on Elderly Patients with Severe Sagittal Imbalance
- Author:
Se-Jun PARK
1
;
Jin-Sung PARK
;
Chong-Suh LEE
;
Tae Soo SHIN
;
Keun-Ho LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2023;15(6):975-982
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Previous reports with proximal junctional failure (PJF) included relatively young patients or deformity without sagittal imbalance. The present study focused on the two well-known risk factors for PJF, old age and severe sagittal imbalance. With these high-risk patients, the present study aimed to identify a strategy that could prevent PJF and to investigate whether the degree of correction would really affect the PJF occurrence.
Methods:Patients who were ≥ 60 years of age and underwent long fusion (≥ 4) to the sacrum for severe sagittal imbalance (defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI–LL] ≥ 30°) were included. PJF was defined as a vertebral fracture at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, myelopathy, or any need for proximal extension of fusion. Presumed risk factors were compared between the patients with and without PJF.
Results:Total 146 patients (mean age, 68.4 years) with preoperative mean PI–LL of 46.8° were included. PJF developed in 39 patients (26.7%) at a mean of 18.1 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.812; p = 0.019) and UIV located below T10 (OR, 3.773; p = 0.010) were significant risk factors for developing PJF. However, the degree of correction did not affect PJF occurrence.
Conclusions:The present study indicates that osteoporosis should be well corrected preoperatively and extending the fusion above T10 should be considered for severe imbalance in old patients. However, the amount of correction was not associated with PJF development.
