OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of prostate cancer on follow up after an initial negative MRI- fusion biopsy of the prostate, and to determine the change in PSA and MRI results on follow-up.

MRI-fusion prostate biopsy registry from 2018 to 2022 was obtained then histopathology, MRI results, and PSA results were obtained. Repeat PSA and MRI results at extracted at 3 years. PSA mean, range, and change were then determined. MRI results were extracted to determine progression, regression, or persistence.

A total of 670 prostate biopsies were done in the study period, of which 70 were included. PSA on biopsy 9.93 (3.35 – 55.0) with corresponding PIRADS lesions 3, 4, and 5 (n=55, n=19, and n=6). No patient was subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer on follow-up. PSA mean 7.03, 6.44, 5.27, and 6.07 at 3years interval from biopsy. Repeat prostate MRI showed persistence in 1 and regression in 6 patients.

After a negative MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate no patient developed prostate cancer with a general decrease in trend in PSA and MRI on follow-up. These patients may have longer interval follow-up periods given the clinical scenario but would be best to test this method in prospective trials first.

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a significant health problem worldwide. Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy has limitations in the detection of clinically significant disease, hence, new imaging including multiparametric MRI and MRI targeted biopsy is developed. In most centers, reading and contouring of the prostate and identification of significant lesions on MRI are performed by radiologists. In this institution, these steps are performed by a urologist. Objective: To determine the clinically significant cancer detection rate in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted and random systematic prostate biopsy where MRI PIRADS scoring, identification of lesions and contouring are performed by a trained urologist in a Philippine tertiary hospital. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of patients who underwent MRI fusion prostate biopsy in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) from June 2021 to June 2023. Clinically significant cancer (csCancer) detection rates were calculated for MRI fusion prostate biopsy, random systematic prostate biopsy, and PIRADS scoring. Concordance was also determined between PIRADS scores and histopathological results. Results: Forty six (46) patients who underwent MRI fusion biopsy in PGH were included in the study, representing a total of 90 lesions identified by urologists using mpMRA with PIRADS scores of at least 3. Of the patients, 13 (14.4%) were diagnosed with csCancer, while a large proportion was diagnosed with benign prostatic tissue. The csCancer detection rate of MRI fusion biopsy was 28.3% (13/46) and 8.7% (4/46) for random biopsy. The csCancer detection rate was 11.1%, 14.6%, and 36.4% for PIRADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Conclusion The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer using MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsy based on urologist-performed MRI reading and contouring was superior to random systematic approach. The positive predictive value of PIRADS scores when interpreted by urologists was lower compared to reported values in the literature and did not show concordance. This may reflect lowered thresholds for labeling prostate lesions as suspicious in urologists.
Prostatic Neoplasms

INTRODUCTION: 68Ga-PSMA PET is an effective imaging modality in the evaluation of prostate cancer. However, there is limited data on its use in the evaluation of therapeutic response, particularly in radioligand therapy. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET hybrid imaging in evaluating response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy in patients with mCRPC compared with the standard use of serum PSA. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was done according to the Cochrane diagnostic accuracy reviews guidelines and the PRISMA checklist of literature from January 2015 to August 2020. Literature search, study selection, and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers. Statistical analysis of data was done using Meta-DiSc v1.4 RESULTS: A total of 5 studies were included following screening. A total of 128 patients were included in the review. Using PSA response as the reference standard, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET hybrid imaging to evaluate treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy was 85% (Cl: 74 to 92%) and 74% (Cl: 62 to 84%), respectively. The computed diagnostic accuracy was 79.7%. CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA PET hybrid imaging is an effective diagnostic procedure in evaluating treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy ligand therapy with good sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.
Gallium ; lutetium ; prostatic neoplasms

Synovial sarcoma is an extremely rare soft tissue cancer that predominantly affects young adults, typically occurring at the para-articular region of the extremities. Primary synovial sarcoma of the prostate is exceptionally uncommon in clinical practice.

Presented here is a case of a 29-year-old male with prostatic synovial sarcoma. He experienced lower urinary tract symptoms and eventually had urine retention. Also discussed here are the imaging findings, treatment plan, and differential diagnosis.

The patient experienced urinary frequency, dysuria, and acute urinary retention, which led to the insertion of a Foley catheter. Subsequent ultrasound scans revealed a large lobulated solid prostate gland. A prostate biopsy confirmed the presence of a malignant spindle cell neoplasm, indicating a prostatic stromal sarcoma. Immunohistomorphologic findings (TLE-1+, STAT6-, S100-, CD34-, ER-, PR-) were consistent with a diagnosis of Monophasic Synovial Sarcoma. The patient underwent six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before a Radical Prostatectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in a significantly improved condition.

Given the rarity of this condition, the authors are reporting a case of prostatic synovial sarcoma and how they managed it. They performed a radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which had a positive effect. Subsequent postoperative monitoring and imaging showed no further symptoms.

Male ; Humans ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; World Health Organization

Objective: To analyze three different integrated scoring schemes of prostate biopsy and to compare their concordance with the scoring of radical prostatectomy specimens. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 556 patients with radical prostatectomy performed in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China from 2017 to 2020. In these cases, whole organ sections were performed, the pathological data based on biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens were summarized, and 3 integrated scores of prostate biopsy were calculated, namely the global score, the highest score and score of the largest volume. Results: Among the 556 patients, 104 cases (18.7%) were classified as WHO/ISUP grade group 1, 227 cases (40.8%) as grade group 2 (3+4=7); 143 cases (25.7%) as grade group 3 (4+3=7); 44 cases (7.9%) as grade group 4 (4+4=8) and 38 cases (6.8%) as grade group 5. Among the three comprehensive scoring methods for prostate cancer biopsy, the consistency of global score was the highest (62.4%). In the correlation analysis, the correlation between the scores of radical specimens and the global scores was highest (R=0.730, P<0.01), while the correlations of the scores based on radical specimens with highest scores and scores of the largest volume based on biopsy were insignificant (R=0.719, P<0.01; R=0.631, P<0.01, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed tPSA group and the three integrated scores of prostate biopsy were statistically correlated with extraglandular invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion and biochemical recurrence. Elevated global score was an independent prognostic risk factor for extraglandular invasion and biochemical recurrence in patients; increased serum tPSA was an independent prognostic risk factor for extraglandular invasion; increased hjighest score was an independent risk factor for perineural invasion. Conclusions: In this study, among the three different integrated scores, the overall score is most likely corresponded to the radical specimen grade group, but there is difference in various subgroup analyses. Integrated score of prostate biopsy can reflect grade group of radical prostatectomy specimens, thereby providing more clinical information for assisting in optimal patient management and consultation.
Male ; Humans ; Prostate/pathology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Prostatectomy/methods* ; Biopsy ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology*

Objective To investigate the clinicopathological features,immunohistochemical features,diagnosis,and relationship with sporadic prostate cancer in primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of 12 patients with primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder diagnosed at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2013 to September 2022.The histological features of primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder were re-evaluated by two pathologists according to the 2022 revision of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs.Electronic medical records were retrieved,and telephone follow-up was conducted from the time of histopathological diagnosis to the death or the end of the last follow-up until January 31,2023. Results The 12 patients include 7 patients in pT3 stage and 1 patient in pT4 stage.Eight patients were complicated with other types of tumors,such as high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and squamous cell carcinoma.Five patients had sporadic prostate cancer.Immunohistochemical staining showed that 12 (100.0%),10 (83.3%),and 8 (66.7%) patients were tested positive for CD56,Syn,and CgA,respectively.The Ki67 proliferation index ranged from 80% to 90%.Five patients with urothelial carcinoma were tested positive for CK20,GATA3,and CK7.P504S was positive in all the 5 patients with prostate cancer,while P63 and 34βE12 were negative.The follow-up of the 12 patients lasted for 3-60 months.Eight of these patients died during follow-up,with the median survival of 15.5 months.Four patients survived. Conclusions Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder is a rare urological tumor with high aggressiveness and poor prognosis.In male patients with bladder prostatectomy,all prostate tissue should be sampled.If prostate cancer is detected,the prostate-specific antigen level should be monitored.
Humans ; Male ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology* ; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology* ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology* ; Urinary Bladder/pathology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Biomarkers, Tumor

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is an important tool for prostate cancer diagnosis, and accurate segmentation of MR prostate regions by computer-aided diagnostic techniques is important for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In this paper, we propose an improved end-to-end three-dimensional image segmentation network using a deep learning approach to the traditional V-Net network (V-Net) network in order to provide more accurate image segmentation results. Firstly, we fused the soft attention mechanism into the traditional V-Net's jump connection, and combined short jump connection and small convolutional kernel to further improve the network segmentation accuracy. Then the prostate region was segmented using the Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012 (PROMISE 12) challenge dataset, and the model was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The DSC and HD values of the segmented model could reach 0.903 and 3.912 mm, respectively. The experimental results show that the algorithm in this paper can provide more accurate three-dimensional segmentation results, which can accurately and efficiently segment prostate MR images and provide a reliable basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Male ; Humans ; Prostate/diagnostic imaging* ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*

Studies have investigated the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use on the incidence and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the results have been inconsistent. We searched the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to March 2022; 13 studies covering 84 003 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with or without ADT met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore the association between ADT use and the infection risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and severity of COVID-19. After synthesizing the evidence, the pooled RR in the SARS-CoV-2 positive group was equal to 1.17, and the SARS-CoV-2 positive risk in PCa patients using ADT was not significantly different from that in those not using ADT (P = 0.544). Moreover, no significant results concerning the beneficial effect of ADT on the rate of intensive care unit admission (RR = 1.04, P = 0.872) or death risk (RR = 1.23, P = 0.53) were found. However, PCa patients with a history of ADT use had a markedly higher COVID-19 hospitalization rate (RR = 1.31, P = 0.015) than those with no history of ADT use. These findings indicate that ADT use by PCa patients is associated with a high risk of hospitalization during infection with SARS-CoV-2. A large number of high quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
Male ; Humans ; Prostatic Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects* ; COVID-19 ; Androgens/therapeutic use* ; SARS-CoV-2

Most prostate cancers initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). With the long-term application of ADT, localized prostate cancer will progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), and the transcriptional network shifted. Forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) may play a key role in this process through multiple mechanisms. To better understand the role of FOXA1 in prostate cancer, we review the interplay among FOXA1-targeted genes, modulators of FOXA1, and FOXA1 with a particular emphasis on androgen receptor (AR) function. Furthermore, we discuss the distinct role of FOXA1 mutations in prostate cancer and clinical significance of FOXA1. We summarize possible regulation pathways of FOXA1 in different stages of prostate cancer. We focus on links between FOXA1 and AR, which may play different roles in various types of prostate cancer. Finally, we discuss FOXA1 mutation and its clinical significance in prostate cancer. FOXA1 regulates the development of prostate cancer through various pathways, and it could be a biomarker for mCRPC and NEPC. Future efforts need to focus on mechanisms underlying mutation of FOXA1 in advanced prostate cancer. We believe that FOXA1 would be a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer.
Humans ; Male ; Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Androgens/metabolism* ; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha/metabolism* ; Mutation ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy* ; Receptors, Androgen/metabolism*