Background/Aims: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. We investigated genomic determinants of clinical benefit from gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in advanced BTC. Methods: Clinical and genomic data using TruSight Oncology 500 were analyzed from patients treated with GAP (N=198) or GC (N=89) as first-line therapy. Results: With a median follow-up of 33.0 months, GAP modestly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–0.989) without significant overall survival (OS) difference compared to GC. Genomic profiling revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (35.2%), KRAS (16.4%), SMAD4 (10.5%), and TNFRSF14 (10.5%), involving RTK/RAS (44.3%), TP53 (41.8%), and PI3K (20.2%) pathways. Single-gene mutations did not predict treatment benefit. However, pathway-level analysis identified PI3K pathway activation as significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.148; 95% CI 1.478–3.124) and OS (HR 2.096; 95% CI 1.413–3.109) in patients receiving GAP, an effect not observed with GC. Importantly, GAP conferred clinical benefit only in patients without PI3K pathway activation, while no survival advantage was seen in those with such alterations (Pinteraction=0.023 for PFS, Pinteraction=0.003 for OS). Similar results were obtained in the independent validation cohort treated with GAP (N=103) or GC (N=64) for BTC. Conclusions Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing identified PI3K pathway activation as key molecular determinant that differentiates patient outcomes between GAP and GC treatments in advanced BTC.

Purpose: This study compared the efficacy of different irrigation methods for the removal of Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal. Materials and Methods: The root canals of 75 human mandibular premolars with standardized 15-mm canal lengths were prepared using nickel-titanium rotary files. After drying, the canals were filled with Ca(OH)2 paste. The teeth were divided into five groups: Control group (Group C), conventional irrigation; Group EA, sonic activation (EndoActivator); Groups EQA and EQB, sonic activation (EQ-S with metal tips A and B, respectively); and Group EU, ultrasonic activation (EndoUltra).The Ca(OH)2 paste volume before and after irrigation was measured using micro-computed tomography (CT) images. One specimen from each group was bisected along the long axis, and the canal walls were evaluated at 100× magnification using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Overall, Ca(OH)2 paste removal was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. In the coronal third, removal rate was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. In the middle third, Groups EQB and EU outperformed Group C. Removal from the apical third was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. All groups showed greater removal from the coronal and middle thirds than from the apical third. Conclusion Sonic and ultrasonic irrigation methods demonstrated higher efficacy than conventional irrigation method for the removal of Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal. All groups demonstrated better effectiveness in removal from the coronal and middle thirds than from the apical third.