Bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis (BUIN) is an unfortunate complication of urethroplasties. This is a result of previous unsalvageable strictures resulting from previous repairs. Here, we present the first case of entero-urethroplasty performed using a sigmoid flap. A 27-year-old man visited the urology clinic with a complaint of urine retention on cystostomy 1 year prior. He had a motor vehicle accident that injured the urethra. He had previously undergone excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) urethroplasty and redo EPA; however, the results were unsatisfactory. Entero-urethroplasty was performed using a sigmoid colon flap harvested carefully from the patient's sigmoid colon, and reconstructive options are limited to BUIN. The sigmoid flap reconstruction appears for treating BUN. This study's limitation is the short follow-up period. Therefore, further studies and long-term follow-up should be performed to assess the effectiveness of this technique.
sigmoid ; stricture ; urethra ; urethroplasty

Sigmoid colon schwannoma is a rare benign gastrointestinal tumor that is challenging to be diagnosed preoperatively.This paper reported a case of sigmoid colon schwannoma that was preoperatively misdiagnosed as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor on ultrasonography.Intraoperative frozen section analysis identified it as a spindle cell tumor,with definitive diagnosis confirmed as gastrointestinal schwannoma via immunohistochemistry.This paper summarizes the similarities and differentiating features of intestinal stromal tumors and schwannomas on ultrasonographic imaging.By analyzing and discussing previous literature,we aim to enhance the diagnostic and differential diagnostic capabilities of ultrasonographers in preoperative evaluation of intestinal schwannomas,thereby providing reliable evidence for clinicians in the diagnosis and management of this condition.
Humans ; Neurilemmoma/diagnostic imaging* ; Ultrasonography ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Male ; Colon, Sigmoid/diagnostic imaging* ; Middle Aged ; Female ; Diagnosis, Differential

Humans ; Accidents, Traffic ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Forensic Medicine ; Autopsy ; Abdominal Injuries ; Thoracic Injuries ; Rupture

Humans ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Hamartoma/surgery* ; Schwann Cells ; Mucous Membrane

Anastomosis, Surgical ; Colon, Sigmoid/surgery* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Robotics

Tumor spreading through the lymphatic drainage is an important metastatic pathway for rectum and sigmoid colon carcinoma. Regional lymph node dissection, as an important part of radical resection of colorectal cancer, is the main way for patients with colorectal cancer to achieve radical resection and acquire tumor-free survival. The regional lymph nodes of sigmoid cancer include paracolic lymph nodes, intermediate lymph nodes, and central lymph nodes locating at the root of blood vessel, and radical surgery should include lymph node dissection at the above three stations. The lymphatic pathways of metastasis for rectal cancer include longitudinal metastasis within the mesorectum and lateral metastasis beyond the mesorectum. The standard surgical method of rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision (TME) at present, and the resection range includes the metastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum through the longitudinal pathway. However, there are many different opinions about lateral lymph node dissection(LLND) aiming at the metastatic lymph nodes locating at the lateral space of rectum. The range of lymph node dissection for rectum and sigmoid cancer is a vital factor that determines the prognosis of patients. Insufficient range of dissection can lead to residual metastatic lymph nodes and have serious impacts on the prognosis of patients. Excessive range of dissection can result in greater surgical trauma, prolonged operation time, more blood loss, and higher rate of complication without oncological benefits. Individualizating the appropriate resection range of rectum and sigmoid colon cancer on the basis of standardization and according to the clinical stage and invasion range of tumor demonstrates great significance of ensuring the radical operation, reducing trauma, promoting rehabilitation, protecting the function and improving the prognosis.
Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Lymph Nodes/pathology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Rectum/pathology* ; Reference Standards ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery*

Colon, Sigmoid/surgery* ; Colostomy ; Humans ; Ostomy ; Prolapse ; Surgical Stomas

Objective: To evaluate the mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) colectomy using the Cai tube in the treatment of left colorectal cancer. Methods: A prospective randomized control trial (China Clinical Trials Registration Number: ChiCTR-OOR-15007060) was performed. Sixty patients with left colorectal cancer at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital from September 2015 to August 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Case inclusion criteria: (1) left colorectal adenocarcinoma (rectal cancer with distance ≥ 8 cm from tumor low margin to anal edge, sigmoid colon cancer, descending colon cancer and left transverse colon cancer) confirmed by preoperative pathology; (2) satisfactory conditions of conventional laparoscopic surgery; (3) maximum diameter of the tumor < 4.5 cm confirmed by preoperative abdominal and pelvic CT or MRI; (4) BMI < 30 kg/m². Case exclusion criteria: (1) benign lesions, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma and other special pathological types of tumors confirmed by preoperative pathological examination; (2) multiple or recurrent cancers; (3) with a history of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; (4) obvious regional infiltration or distant metastasis indicated by preoperative imaging examination; (5) intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, etc. Participants were randomly assigned to NOSES group (using the Cai tube) and conventional laparoscopy (CL) group by random number table method. Clinical data between two groups were compared and analyzed, including perioperative conditions, tumor exfoliation cell detection and bacterial culture results of intraperitoneal lavage fluid, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading), postoperative pain [visual simulation scoring (VAS) assessment], anal function (Kirwan anal function grading assessment), and postoperative 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), overall recurrence rate, and local recurrence rate. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled, with 30 in the NOSES group and 30 in the CL group. All the patients in the NOSES group successfully completed operation with Cai tube. Baseline data between the two groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in conversion rate to open surgery, number of lymph node harivested, proximal and distal resection margin of tumor, negative rate of circumferential margin, operation time, blood loss, inflammatory indexes, postoperative anal function, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, morbidity of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II or above) (all P>0.05). Compared to the CL group, the NOSES group had lower maximum postoperative VAS score (2.5±0.3 vs. 5.1±0.4, t=3.187, P<0.01), and fewer use of additional postoperative analgesia [6.7% (2/30) vs. 33.3% (10/30),χ²=6.670, P=0.02]. The postoperative time to gas passage was shorter in the NOSES group [(2.2±1.4) days vs. (3.1±1.2) days,P=0.026]. No tumor cells and bacterial contamination were found in abdominal lavage fluid before and after operation in either group. The anal function at postoperative 3-month of all the patients in the NOSES group was Kirwan grade I to II, while in the CL group, anal function of 2 cases (6.7%) was Kirwan grade III, and of 28 cases was also Kirwan grade I to II, whose difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the NOSES group and the CL group, 3-year DFS was 96.7% and 83.3% (P=0.090), OS was 100% and 90% (P=0.096), overall recurrence rate was 3.3% and 10.0% (P=0.166), and local recurrence rate was 3.3% and 3.3% (P=0.999), respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of left colorectal cancer, compared with conventional laparoscopic colectomy, NOSES colectomy using Cai tube exhibits less scar, less postoperative pain, shorter recovery of gastrointestinal function, and similar mid-term outcomes. Given proper surgical indications, the surgical procedure is safe and feasible.
Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Pain, Postoperative ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome

We reported a case of irreducible indirect inguinal hernia caused by sigmoid colon cancer entering the right groin.The patient complained about a right groin mass for more than 60 years with progressive enlargement for 3 years and pain for half a month.Abdominal CT examination at admission showed rectum and sigmoid colon hernia in the right inguinal area and thickening of sigmoid colon wall.Electronic colonoscopy and pathological diagnosis showed sigmoid colon cancer.Therefore,the result of preliminary diagnosis was irreducible indirect inguinal hernia caused by sigmoid colon cancer entering the right groin.We converted laparoscopic exploration to laparotomy followed by radical sigmoidectomy and employed end-to-end anastomosis of descending colon and rectum in combination with repair of right inguinal hernia.The patient recovered well after operation and was discharged.
Colon, Sigmoid/surgery* ; Groin ; Hernia, Inguinal/surgery* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery*

PURPOSE: The Oral-anal Transit Test (OTT) is a simple method of obtaining information about colonic transit. We aim to assess the correlation of OTT with the neuromuscular integrity of the colon determined by colonic manometry (CM).METHODS: All patients who had OTT followed by CM were evaluated. Less than 6 of 24 markers remaining on OTT was considered normal. CM was performed per previously published guidelines. A normal CM was defined as at least one High Amplitude Propagating Contraction progressing from the most proximal sensor through the sigmoid colon.RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent both OTT and CM (44% male, age 4–18 years, mean 11.5 years, 97% functional constipation +/− soiling, Hirschsprung's Disease). Of normal and abnormal OTT patients, 85.7% (6/7) and 18.5% (5/27) respectively had normal CM. When all markers progressed to at least the sigmoid colon, this was 100% predictive against colonic inertia. Greater than 50% of patients with manometric isolated sigmoid dysfunction had markers proximal to the recto-sigmoid.CONCLUSION: OTT and CM are both valuable studies that assess different aspects of colonic function. OTT can be used as a screening test to rule out colonic inertia. However, the most proximal extent of remaining markers does not predict the anatomical extent of the manometric abnormality, particularly in isolated sigmoid dysfunction.
Child ; Colon ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Constipation ; Fecal Incontinence ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; Mass Screening ; Methods ; Soil