BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) was introduced by the Department of Health through AO 2012-0029. This is anchored to WHO PEN, a prioritized set of cost-effective interventions that can be carried out to provide an acceptable standard of care at the primary health care level, even in low-resource settings. The study aims to evaluate the availability and adequacy of primary health care facilities in providing the PhilPEN package of interventions using the WHO assessment tool.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 25 randomly selected primary health care facilities in Metro Manila. Data were collected through structured interviews with facility staff and direct observation using a standardized questionnaire aligned with PhilPEN and WHO PEN guidelines. The tool assessed PhilPEN inputs (infrastructure, human resources, basic tools and equipment, essential medicines, record-keeping, financing) and services (risk assessment and screening, early diagnosis and monitoring, treatment and follow-up, counseling, referral of patients).

All facilities met the basic standards for infrastructure, human resources, record keeping, and financing. However, only 40% had all essential medicines, and just 16% had complete tools, including urine ketone/protein test strips. Risk assessment and patient counseling were consistently implemented, but early diagnosis and follow-up services were inconsistent due to training and supply gaps.

Primary health care centers in Metro Manila demonstrate partial readiness for PhilPEN implementation. Gaps in tools, medicines, and protocol availability should be addressed to optimize NCD service delivery.

Effective discharge planning is crucial for ensuring safe transitions and sustained occupational participation as clients transition from professional care to their desired community settings. Despite its importance, current discharge practices in occupational therapy remain inconsistent, often relying on informal communication, variable team coordination, and unstructured decision-making. These gaps contribute to client–caregiver unpreparedness, fragmented services, and increased readmissions. This manuscript presents the Building Rehabilitation Into Discharge Goals and Engagement (BRIDGE) Framework, a client-centered, occupation-focused conceptual model designed to structure and support the discharge planning process in occupational therapy.

The BRIDGE framework was developed through an iterative process of literature review, theoretical grounding, and integration of clinical experience. It synthesizes principles from the Canadian Practice Process Framework, Person–Environment–Occupation frameworks, the Kawa Model, and Bioecological Systems Theory. The framework outlines six discharge planning steps, ranging from goal and timeline setting to follow-up and monitoring, supported by four foundational pillars: patient and family factors, occupational therapy factors, interdisciplinary team factors, and environmental or system influences. Together, these components provide a comprehensive guide for clinical reasoning, collaborative planning, caregiver preparation, and transitional support.

The framework clarifies the role of occupational therapy, enhances interprofessional coordination, and promotes consistent transition planning. Future work should include empirical testing, case-based application, and population-specific adaptations.

Introduction: Insulin therapy is essential in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but is often associated with treatment burden, hypoglycemia, and potential overtreatment. Insulin deintensification is increasingly recommended for appropriately selected patients; however, there is limited real-world evidence to guide patient selection and to identify modifiable factors that influence successful insulin deintensification. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors, including modifiable factors, associated with successful insulin deintensification in a primary care setting. Methodology: A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted across seven government primary care clinics in the Petaling District. Adult patients with T2DM undergoing insulin deintensification were included. Successful insulin deintensification was defined as maintenance or improvement of hemoglobin A1c following insulin discontinuation, dose reduction, or reduction in injection frequency. Paired outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of successful insulin deintensification. Results: A total of 261 patients were included. Glycemic control remained stable following insulin deintensification (p = 0.334). Significant reductions in body weight (−0.41 kg, p = 0.012) and total daily insulin dose (23.1% reduction, p <0.001) were observed. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between groups. However, multivariable logistic regression identified SGLT-2 inhibitor use (aOR 3.23, 95% CI 1.28–8.18, p = 0.013) and regular SMBG (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.05–3.81, p = 0.035) as independent predictors of successful insulin deintensification. Conclusion Insulin deintensification can be successfully implemented without compromising glycemic control. Identified predictors, including modifiable factors such as SGLT-2 inhibitor use and SMBG, provide clinically actionable insights to guide patient selection and treatment optimization. These findings challenge the traditional reluctance toward insulin deintensification and support a more evidence-based and individualized approach in routine clinical practice.
Primary Health Care ; Insulins

Introduction: Insulin deintensification is an emerging strategy to reduce hypoglycemia and treatment burden in patients on multiple daily injection (MDI ≥3), with potential to improve adherence and glycemic control. However, evidence in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited. This study evaluated its effectiveness and identified factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control following deintensification among patients with poorly controlled T2DM attending Malaysian primary care. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 107 T2DM patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >9%, attending Enhanced Diabetic Clinic at Cheras Health Clinic between 2021 and 2025. All patients on basal-bolus insulin (BBI) underwent deintensification. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control (HbA1c <7.5%). Changes in HbA1c following deintensification were assessed using paired t-tests. Results: Overall, 50.5% of patients achieved adequate glycemic control. Hypoglycemia events (AOR 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–58.3; p = 0.015), MDI (AOR 9.6, 95% CI 1.4–67.1; p = 0.023) and Diabetes Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (DMTAC) visits (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0– 1.2; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with achieving HbA1c <7.5%. Conversely, patients transitioned from BBI to premixed regimens were less likely to achieve HbA1c <7.5% (AOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.93, p = 0.039). All insulin deintensification strategies were associated with significant HbA1c improvements with transitioned from BBI to premixed human insulin (mean difference -2.54%, 95% CI 1.77–3.31, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.09), BBI to premixed analogue insulin (mean difference -3.38%, 95% CI 2.26– 4.49, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.62), BBI to basal insulin (mean difference -3.67%, 95% CI 1.79–5.54, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 2.05). Conclusion Insulin deintensification is an effective strategy for improving glycemic control in poorly controlled T2DM. These findings highlight the importance of deintensification with careful consideration of hypoglycemia, MDI-related treatment burden, and patient engagement through regular DMTAC visits, which are integral to achieving optimal outcomes and support a personalized approach to diabetes management in primary care.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glycemic Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Primary Health Care ; Insulins

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the level of health system responsiveness of Rural Health Units (RHUs) in Cagayan Valley Region along seven domains of responsiveness namely dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, choice of provider, prompt attention, communication, and quality of basic amenities, and five core components of the health system namely health governance, health human resource, health information system, access to medicines and technology, and service delivery.

A cross-sectional research design was adopted using survey as the primary means of data collection using a researcher-developed questionnaire. The study was conducted in RHUs of 15 identified municipalities in the region. The municipalities were chosen based on their low performance in the LGU health score cards for 2019. A total of 618 clients and 235 health workers were included in the study. Frequency, percentage, and mean were used to analyze the profile and level of health system responsiveness. T test and one-way ANOVA were used to test significant differences.

The results showed that the RHUs included in the study have very good level of health system responsiveness, with overall percentage scores ranging from 73.55 to 88.08, in all domains assessed. However, choice of providers within the facilities (62.71%) and access to medicine and technology (77.45%) were the least responsive among all the identified domains. Significant differences in the clients’ assessment of the responsiveness of the RHUs were seen when grouped according to their sex, age, educational attainment, income level, overall level of health, frequency of visits, and distance of home to facility. The RHUs’ location, whether in an urban or rural area, number of staff, and number of barangays catered also were found to determine the level of health system responsiveness. Moreover, not all RHUs were able to comply with basic requirements of the Department of Health specifically along the services offered.

It can be concluded therefore that the RHUs, despite the limitations in certain aspects are still able to meet the expectations of the clients and health workers in the delivery of health services. However, in order to maximize responsiveness of these facilities, DOH requirements for these facilities should be met.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the measures to improve the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these measures using quality improvement methodology. METHODS: The follow-up status of preterm infants discharged from March to May 2017 was used as the baseline before quality improvement, and a specific quality improvement goal for the follow-up rate was proposed. The Pareto chart was used to analyze the causes of follow-up failure, and a key driver diagram was constructed based on the links involved in improving follow-up rate. The causes of failure were analyzed to determine the key links and intervention measures for quality improvement, and the follow-up rate was monitored weekly using a control chart until the quality improvement goal was achieved. RESULTS: The follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge was 57.92% (117/202) at baseline before quality improvement, and the quality improvement goal was set to increase the follow-up rate of preterm infants from baseline to more than 80% within 12 months. The Pareto chart analysis showed that the main causes of follow-up failure were deficiencies in follow-up file management and irregular follow-up times (33.70%, 31/92), insufficient follow-up education and poor communication (25.00%, 23/92), and the inability to meet the diverse needs of parents (18.48%, 17/92). Based on the key links for quality improvement and the main causes of follow-up failure, the following intervention measures were adopted: (1) strengthen follow-up publicity and education; (2) build a follow-up team; and (3) establish a follow-up platform and system. The control chart indicated that with the implementation of the above intervention measures, the weekly follow-up rate increased to 74.09% (306/413) in July 2017 and 83.09% (511/615) in December 2017, finally achieving the quality improvement goal. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the follow-up rate of preterm infants fluctuated between 23.54% (460/1 954) and 70.97% (1 931/2 721), and subsequently, it returned to pre-pandemic levels starting in February 2023. CONCLUSIONS The application of quality improvement methodology can help to formulate intervention measures based on the main causes of follow-up failure, thereby improving the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge. This quality improvement method is feasible and practical and thus holds promise for clinical application.
Humans ; Quality Improvement ; Infant, Premature ; Infant, Newborn ; Patient Discharge ; Follow-Up Studies ; Female ; Male

In order to effectively assist primary healthcare providers in promptly identifying neonatal pertussis and administering effective treatment to reduce the incidence of severe neonatal pertussis, the Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association organized a panel of experts to develop the "Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: neonatal pertussis (2025)", based on the latest clinical evidence and expert consensus. This guideline provides primary healthcare providers with 14 recommendations addressing nine common clinical questions in neonatal pertussis.
Humans ; Whooping Cough/drug therapy* ; Infant, Newborn ; Primary Health Care

Seizures are common clinical emergencies in neonatology, potentially leading to severe complications and directly impacting the neurodevelopmental prognosis of the infants with this condition. For primary healthcare providers, key clinical challenges include standardized emergency management, precise clinical diagnosis and treatment, and accurate assessment of referral indications. To assist primary healthcare providers in the prompt identification and standardized management of neonatal seizures, the Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association organized a panel of experts to develop the "Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: neonatal seizures (2025)", based on the latest clinical evidence and expert consensus. This guideline provides primary healthcare providers with 17 recommendations addressing nine common clinical questions in neonatal seizures.
Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Seizures/therapy* ; Primary Health Care ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis*

Neonatal transport is a crucial aspect of clinical work in neonatology, aimed at timely and safely transferring high-risk neonates from birth facilities or primary healthcare institutions to neonatal centers equipped for critical care. This ensures timely diagnosis and treatment, thereby reducing mortality and complications and improving outcomes. Currently, there is significant regional variation in neonatal transport practices across China. In response, the Subspecialty Group of Neonatology of Society of Pediatrics of Chinese Medical Association and the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics have jointly developed the "Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: neonatal transport (2025)". This guideline addresses 10 clinical issues related to neonatal transport and formulates 18 recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert consensus. It aims to provide a systematic approach to neonatal transport in primary care settings, tailored to the national context of China, offering guidance and decision-making support for primary healthcare providers.
Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Primary Health Care ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis* ; Transportation of Patients/standards*

To assist primary healthcare personnel in promptly and accurately identifying neonatal vomiting, providing precise diagnosis, standardized treatment, or timely referral for rescue, thereby reducing the occurrence of complications and ensuring the health of infants, the Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association has organized experts to formulate this consensus based on the latest clinical research advancements and thorough discussions. This consensus addresses eight common clinical issues faced by primary healthcare personnel and forms 21 recommendations.
Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Vomiting/etiology* ; Primary Health Care ; Consensus ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis*