Education ; Health Education ; Global Health

Human ; Education, Medical ; Education

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anatomical education utilizes mainly cadaver dissection, but it also depends on innovations such as novel preservation techniques, simulation models, and virtual dissection apps. There is no review on anatomical patents. This study aimed to review the worldwide landscape of existing patents on anatomical education to identify gaps and opportunities for utilization and further innovations.

We conducted a scoping review for inventions, utility models, and industrial design applications on anatomical education. We searched the following databases as of December 31, 2022 (WIPO Patentscope, Espacenet, and Derwent). We deduplicated the records, screened them for eligibility, and extracted information on characteristics of the patent application and applicant. We computed frequency and percentage according to country, type of applicant, number of inventors, type of patent, scope of patent, purpose of patent, organ system, status of patent, and time to patent granting.

Out of 667 merged records from the initial search, we removed 312 duplicates, excluded 97 records, and included 258 reports in the review. The median number of patent applications per year was 58 (range, 32, 61). Majority of the applications were from China and USA (36.0 and 34.9%, respectively), national in scope (62.8%), industry as applicant (49.6%), inventions (77.5%), usable beyond anatomy (70.9%), physical models (53.1%) and with pending status (63.6%). The median time to granting for 65 patents was 316 days (range, 40 to 1568).

For the period 2018-2022, there were 258 patent applications related to anatomical education, both as a basic science and in clinical applications, were mostly inventions, applied for by industry, contributed by US and China, only national in scope, physical 3D models (mostly musculoskeletal, head/neck and sensory organs, and whole body), and usable beyond basic anatomy. The majority of patent applications are still pending with only 65 granted patents. Plastinated specimens, and the urinary, reproductive, and pulmonary organ system models were least represented.

BACKGROUND

Proficiency in performing thoracentesis is a key competency recommended in the Medical Schools Objective Project (MSOP) adopted by the American Association of Medical Colleges, USA, that medical students should possess prior to graduation, although they often do not practice it clinically until the later stages of their training. Thiel-embalmed cadavers, which offer a lifelike experience with less irritation than formalin-preserved cadavers, have been increasingly used as early as 1st year medical school to teach such procedures because of their feel-like and look-like real patients. There are no studies on the use of Thiel- cadavers for simulated thoracentesis among medical students in the Philippines.

To evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of medical students on the use of Thiel-soft embalmed cadavers for simulated thoracentesis as to the understanding of thoracic anatomy, overall learning experience, and confidence in performing the procedure in the cadaver and possibly in the clinical setting.

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study among Learning Unit III medical students in the University of the Philippines conducted from June 13 to 17, 2022. In the final station of the Organ System Course 205 of the Department of Anatomy's LEAP II program, a simulated thoracentesis procedure was set up using a Thiel-preserved cadaver with artificially created pleural effusion. After watching and studying thoracic anatomy, watching a video on how thoracentesis was performed by a general surgeon, students performed the procedure, and were asked to answer a 6-question Likert-scale survey to assess their perceptions and attitudes of the simulation procedure. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Most of the students strongly agreed that practicing thoracentesis on the soft cadaver has improved their understanding of the anatomical basis of doing thoracentesis (97%) and of the steps of the procedure (94.9%). Similarly, when asked about how they felt doing the simulated thoracentesis, almost all (98%) strongly agreed that it was an enjoyable and stimulating learning experience. Majority strongly agreed (68%) that they felt capable doing the procedure on a soft cadaver against less than half (38.4%) feeling capable of doing it in the clinical setting. Almost all (97%) strongly agreed that simulated thoracentesis on a soft-embalmed cadaver should be part of the learning competencies of medical students because of the skills they learn by doing the procedure.

Integrating a simulated thoracentesis using a Thiel-preserved cadaver early in the course of a student’s medical education, provided students with a better understanding of the anatomy of the thoracic wall and the anatomical basis of doing this simulation procedure. Though confidence in performing the procedure in a soft cadaver is higher than in a clinical setting, the latter setting may need repeated training to further hone their skills. Practicing thoracentesis on soft-embalmed cadavers significantly enhanced medical students' understanding and enjoyment of the procedure. This innovative approach can be considered by anatomy educators as an integrative learning activity when teaching thoracic cage anatomy. This can also be extended to senior medical students and residents across different specialties.

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the lack of traditional cadaveric dissection among first year medical students in Anatomy courses in the University of the Philippines College of Medicine. The Learning Enhancement in Anatomy Program (LEAP) was implemented as a bridging program to enhance knowledge and understanding of gross anatomy and histology. As part of this program, a novel multi-strategy teaching method was conducted for the Integumentary and Musculoskeletal Anatomy Module.

This case study described a novel multi-strategy teaching method on Integumentary and Musculoskeletal anatomy for first year medical students which was done after the COVID-19 pandemic wherein there was a shortage of cadavers. By describing this multi-strategy teaching method, this case study aims to present a potential alternative teaching method in a situation where there is an unexpected shortage of human cadavers.

A retrospective review of documents related to this teaching method among first year medical students at the University of the Philippines College of Medicine was conducted from November 15, 2023, to January 15, 2024. The novel teaching method for the Integumentary and Musculoskeletal station was taught using five different methods: proctor demonstration, a prosected lower extremity with a self-directed manual, dissection education videos viewed on a large screen, skeletons for osteology, and individual light microscopes with a self-directed laboratory histology manual. We described the data and analyzed according to strengths and limitations, and formulated recommendations to improve the module.

The Integumentary and Musculoskeletal Module of the LEAP provided an interactive, hands-on experience in anatomy education. The five-pronged method facilitated a multifaceted approach to learning through cadaveric prosections, self-directed manuals, dissection videos, osteology exercises, and microscopic study. There was active engagement, overall positive student feedback, and increased post-test scores. However, certain limitations, such as the lack of direct cadaveric dissection, potential underutilization of histology components, and reliance on faculty guidance, highlight areas for improvement.

The Integumentary and Musculoskeletal Module of the LEAP has demonstrated significant strengths in enhancing anatomical education through a multimodal approach that fosters active learning, improves knowledge retention, and provides a structured curriculum adaptable to various resource constraints. Student feedback and test performance support the effectiveness of the module, particularly in gross anatomy. Addressing challenges in future iterations will be crucial in refining the program and expanding its applicability to different educational contexts. By building on its strengths and mitigating its weaknesses, this five-pronged method can continue to serve as a model for innovative and effective anatomy education. 

BACKGROUND

The University of the Philippines College of Medicine has been lauded for its research output, especially among faculty members. Research is also integrated in its curriculum for medical students in pursuit of “six-star physicians.” However, there has been no consolidated analysis on the outcomes of feedback collected from students.

The study aims to describe the perception of research education among medical students in Learning Units III to VII (LU III-VII) from academic year 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 in the University of the Philippines College of Medicine (UPCM).

Through a mixed-method descriptive design, students enrolled in the MD and MD-PHD program from LU III-VII of the UPCM were invited to participate in a survey. Furthermore, a review of the student research database and course evaluations were conducted.

A total of 197 student-initiated studies were conducted according to the college database, varying in types and approaches. However, only 4% of the registered research was published. Research-oriented courses were also rated highly among the medical students. This was consistent with positive attitudes towards research among the majority of participants. However, only 32.2% of the target sample size participated in the survey.

Participants of the survey had positive perceptions regarding their research education. However, there are several areas for improvement such as provision of grants, publication assistance, compliance with research registration, and mentorship in data analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

One of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education is an increased awareness and use of social media (SocMed) to facilitate learning. However, literature on the use of SocMed in medical education has focused primarily on educator-led teaching activities. Our study aimed to describe SocMed initiatives that were student-led, particularly for information dissemination and peer collaborative learning, and to elicit perceptions of medical students towards such activities.

An online survey on SocMed usage in medical education was sent to all first- and second-year medical students at the University of the Philippines Manila College of Medicine from October to December 2021. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, SocMed habits and preferences, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of SocMed. Descriptive statistics were calculated while the free-text responses were grouped into prominent themes and summarized.

We received a total of 258 responses (71%) out of 361 eligible participants. Overall, 74% found SocMed platforms to be very and extremely helpful; 88% recommended its continued use. The most popular SocMed platforms for different tasks were as follows: Discord for independent study groups and for conducting peer tutoring sessions; Facebook Messenger for reading reminders; Telegram for reading announcements related to academics and administrative requirements, and for accessing material provided by classmates and professors.

The high uptake of SocMed among medical students may be attributed to its accessibility and costefficiency. The use of a particular SocMed platform was dependent on the students’ needs and the platform's features. Students tended to use multiple SocMed platforms that complemented one another. SocMed also had disadvantages, such as the potential to distract from academic work and to become a source of fatigue. Educators must engage with students to understand how SocMed platforms can be integrated into medical education, whether in the physical or virtual learning environment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Mobile health applications have become integral in medical education and information access, yet their effectiveness varies, and barriers to engagement persist. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the usability and effectiveness of the Hypertension Now mHealth application in enhancing knowledge and guideline adherence among Family Medicine residents.

A before-and-after educational intervention study was conducted among residents of the Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM), Philippine General Hospital, from January to August 2023. The study involved the development of a mobile health application, Hypertension Now, designed to support clinicians on hypertension management. Usability, knowledge scores, and adherence to guidelines were assessed through questionnaires, pre- and post-interventions, and medical chart audits.

All 32 DFCM residents participated. The app received high ratings for ease of use, interface, and overall satisfaction. It significantly increased residents' knowledge scores by 1.6 points (p=0.001). Adherence to proper physical examination (82% vs. 91%, p=0.024), diagnosis (80% vs. 90%, p=0.012), and pharmacologic treatment (53% vs. 83%, p=0.001) significantly improved. However, no significant increases were observed in adherence to risk assessment (83% vs. 78%, p=0.371), laboratory examination (35% vs. 40%, p=0.329), and non-pharmacologic treatment (77% vs. 81%, p=0.470).

This study showed the potential of mobile health tools to support medical education and enhance clinical practice in primary care settings. Integrating apps like Hypertension Now could improve management strategies and patient care outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Morbidity and mortality conferences (M&M) have been an important part of the hospital governance since the early 1900s. It has been shown to improve overall quality of care, minimize adverse occurrences and preventable fatalities, and provide chances for educational learning. However, medical trainees have different perceptions of M&M conferences which may affect its effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the perception of surgical trainees towards M&M conferences.

The study is a questionnaire-based survey among surgical trainees of the Department of Surgery, Philippine General Hospital (PGH), for the training year of 2023. The survey consisted of 24 questions on their perception regarding the conduct of M&M. A Likert scale was used by the respondents to rate their perceptions (1 – negative, 10 – positive). Descriptive analysis and ANOVA were used to summarize the responses to the survey.

A total of 64 surgical trainees from the Department of Surgery responded to the survey (response rate = 71.9%). Most respondents (68.8%) reported that the ideal frequency of M&M conferences is once a month. 78.1% were not aware of the inclusion criteria of the cases discussed in the departmental M&M conferences. Most reported (64.1%) that M&M conferences did not regularly include data on outpatient events. A mean rating of 5.2 was observed among surgical trainees on how judgmental they feel about the environment of M&M conferences. Surgical trainees were willing to talk openly about their complications (mean rating 7.1). They were fearful of criticism (mean rating 4.4) and the negative repercussions of their presentations (mean rating 4.1) during M&M conferences. The respondents perceive M&M conferences to be conducive for learning and service improvement with both having a mean rating of 7.8. Most felt that M&M conferences focused on the individual performance (mean rating 7.3) while participants were divided regarding the focus on systems and processes (mean rating of 5.6). In terms of dissemination, about half (45.3%) mentioned that they did not know how the discussions/outcomes were disseminated following an M&M conference. The mean rating of willingness to talk openly of complications were significantly higher among senior residents (7.7) compared to junior residents (6.3) (p=0.008).

This study observed variability in the perceptions of surgical trainees on M&M conferences. Surgical trainees tend to feel fear of criticism and negative repercussions during M&M conferences. There are opportunities for improving the format of M&M in terms of clarity of inclusion criteria and dissemination, and focusing on systems and processes rather than individual faults.

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional collaboration is required as a learning outcome for medical school graduates. Clinical exposure to collaborative practice is one of the recommended strategies in the implementation of interprofessional education. Professionals in mental health units customarily engage in collaborative practice and can provide learning opportunities for medical students. Local data on interprofessional collaboration among practitioners in a mental health care setting in the pandemic is limited and merits study.

The goal of this study was to determine and then describe factors that influence collaborative practice among health professionals in an inpatient mental health care unit in the pandemic. It aimed to generate recommendations from practitioners on strategies to optimize opportunities for medical students to learn interprofessional collaboration.

This is a qualitative study which made use of key informant interviews (KIIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs) with members of a multiprofessional mental health team in the mental health unit of a tertiary medical center. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic had drastically disrupted health care services and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Participants described their roles and identified six factors essential to reenergizing collaborative practice: resources and opportunities for meaningful interaction, quality of relationship and communication among team members, management goals and strategies relevant to the mental health needs and the context of patients and their families, guidelines for collaboration, interprofessional education appropriate to participant levels, and monitoring for quality assurance and improvement. Practical guidelines for promoting the identified factors were outlined. Recommendations to optimize opportunities for interprofessional education were also given.

Six factors were identified and described in the study. These can provide practitioners and students with a frame of reference for participating in and learning from collaborative practice in a mental health care unit as they work with other professionals on a shared concern. Addressing practical issues in real life settings will enhance their capacity to meaningfully collaborate with other professionals in managing patients, institutions, projects, and similar situations.