Objective:To explore the effects and mechanisms of Shen-su-yin (SSY) on acute lung injury (ALI) in rats based on untargeted Metabolomics, network pharmacology, and experimental verification.Methods:Untargeted Metabolomics was performed to detect the ingredients of SSY by using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-Q-exactive orbitrap mass spectrum, and the active ingredients were screened from the detected ingredients. Common targets of the active ingredient targets and ALI targets were utilized to screen hub targets to perform gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. Then, key hub targets were selected from the hub targets, and the active ingredients-hub targets network was built to screen core ingredients. Subsequently, molecular docking was performed between the key hub targets and the core ingredients. 48 rats were randomly and equally divided into 4 groups by using a random number table: normal control group, lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI group, ALI+SSY group, and ALI+dexamethasone group. 24 hours after lipopolysaccharide induction, the levels of respiratory rate, blood lactate, lung wet/dry weight ratio, ALI score, inflammatory factors of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and oxidative stress mediators of lung tissue in each group were evaluated, and the expression of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (AKT)-glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) 3β-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway was also detected by using Western blot. Finally, one-way analysis of variance, Welch test, or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare data differences among groups. Results:A total of 415 ingredients were detected from the SSY. 66 of the detected ingredients were identified as active ingredients, and 10 of them were selected as core ingredients. The number of common targets, hub targets, and key hub targets was 337, 50, and 10, respectively. Total of 285 biological processes, 32 cellular components, and 51 molecular functions were enriched though GO analysis, and 148 cell signaling pathways such as pathways in cancer and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway were enriched though KEGG analysis. Molecular docking studies revealed that all binding energies between the 10 key hub targets and the 10 core ingredients were less than -5 kcal/mol. Compared with the ALI group, the levels of the respiratory rate, blood lactate, and lung wet/dry weight ratio in ALI+SSY group were significantly decreased (all P<0.01), and the level of ALI score showed a downward trend, but the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). In addition, the levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and the levels of malondialdehyde, protein carbonyl, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine in lung tissue of rats in ALI+SSY group were significantly decreased in comparison with those in ALI group (all P<0.01). Moreover, compared with the ALI group, the phosphorylation levels of PI3K p85α, AKT1, and GSK3β and the expression level of Nrf2 in lung tissue of ALI+SSY group were significantly up-regulated (PI3K p85α phosphorylation and AKT1 phosphorylation, P<0.01; GSK3β phosphorylation and Nrf2, P<0.05), while the phosphorylation level of NF-κB p65 was significantly down-regulated ( P<0.01). Conclusions:Active ingredients detected from SSY via untargeted Metabolomics can inhibit oxidative stress and inflammation in ALI rats by regulating the PI3K-AKT-GSK3β-Nrf2/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby alleviating lung lesions.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of propofol on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in hypertensive patients with hyperacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (HU-TBAD).Methods:This study was a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Totally 96 consecutive hypertensive patients with HU-TBAD admitted to the Department of Emergency in our hospital from July 2020 to March 2023 were enrolled and randomly divided into control and treatment groups ( n=48/group) by envelope method. All patients were treated with nicardipine, remifentanil, esmolol, and basic treatments. Besides, patients in the treatment group were injected with 0.5 mg/kg propofol, followed by 1.0 mg/(kg·h) with continuous micro-pump intravenous infusion; the RASS score was evaluated every 15 minutes to adjust the dosage of propofol to maintain the RASS score at -2-0 points, while the control group was given an equal volume of normal saline. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR were analyzed at different time points (TPs). Related indexes between the two groups were compared at 0 (T 0 min) and 60 (T 60 min) minutes. Standard-reaching rate of related indexes, levels of mean nicardipine dose (mND) and urine volume, and adverse effect rates (AERs) were also compared between the two groups. All patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical ward to receive proper management and follow-up for 21 d after discharge from the Department of Emergency. Mann-Whitney U test, t-test, χ2 test, or Fisher's test were used to compare the data between the two groups, while the data of two groups at different TPs were compared by using repetitive measurement deviation analysis. Results:No significant differences were observed in general clinical data between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were significant differences in SBP, DBP, and HR levels in different TPs, groups, and interaction of Time and Group (Time×Group) (all P<0.05). For comparison of related indexes at T 0 min and T 60 min, there were statistical differences in oxygenation index levels at different TPs ( P<0.01), but not in different groups and Time×Group (all P>0.05); significant differences in levels of partial pressure of carbon dioxide, respiratory rate, and lactate were observed in different TPs and Time×Group (all P<0.01), but not observed in different groups (all P>0.05). There were significant differences in NRS score in different TPs, groups, and Time×Group (all P<0.05), while not in cardiac troponin I levels in different TPs, groups, and Time×Group (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the standard-reaching rate of SBP, DBP, HR, sedation, and analgesia as well as the level of RASS score reduction in the treatment group were significantly increased [54.17% vs. 77.08%, 56.25% vs. 81.25%, 50.00% vs. 72.92%, 47.92% vs. 72.92%, 43.75% vs. 83.33%, 1.00 (0, 2.00) vs. 2.00 (1.00, 3.00), respectively, all P<0.05], while the level of mND was significantly decreased [μg·kg -1·min -1, 2.50 (2.00, 2.50) vs. 2.00 (1.50, 2.50), P<0.01]; there were no statistical differences in both urine volume levels and AERs between the two groups (all P>0.05). Following up for 21 d, the rate of aortic dissection deterioration and ICU admission was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (19.57% vs. 4.26%, 23.91% vs.6.38%, respectively, all P<0.05). Conclusions:Propofol enhances the analgesic effect of remifentanil, synergistically reduces SBP, DBP, and HR, and improves clinical prognosis in hypertensive patients with HU-TBAD.