1.Analysis of characteristic differences in ocular surface microbiota between progressive and stationary stages of primary pterygium
Longlong WANG ; Xinqiu LIU ; Lei MENG ; Ziman HAN ; Zhilin XU
International Eye Science 2026;26(11):2010-2017
AIM:To investigate the compositional and structural differences in the ocular surface microbiota of patients with primary pterygium during the progressive and stationary stages, and to identify key microbial biomarkers associated with pterygium progression.METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was adopted. Patients with progressive pterygium(PPG group), stationary pterygium(SPG group), and age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers(HCG group)were enrolled. Conjunctival swabs were collected from the affected eye(or the healthy eye in controls)of each participant. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the V3V4 region was performed. The analytical workflow encompassed rarefaction curve analysis, Alpha/Beta diversity analyses, ASV analysis. LEfSe analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to screen differential microbiota.RESULTS: Final enrollment included 28 patients(28 eyes)in each group: PPG(11 males, 17 females; mean age 60.54±8.44 y), SPG(10 males, 18 females; mean age 61.82±10.21 y), and HCG(12 males, 16 females; mean age 64.07±7.27 y). No significant differences were found among the three groups in baseline characteristics(all P>0.05). The number of valid sequences and the rarefaction curves confirmed sufficient sequencing depth. Alpha/Beta diversity analyses showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups(all P>0.05), indicating that the overall structure of the ocular surface microbiota was relatively stable. LEfSe analysis(LDA score>3.0)revealed that the Propionibacteriales, the Propionibacteriaceae, the Cutibacterium and the Comamonadaceae were significantly enriched in the PPG group. Following Kruskal-Wallis H tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the relative abundances of Propionibacteriales, Propionibacteriaceae, and Cutibacterium were significantly higher in PPG group than in the HCG group(all PSymbol|@@0.05), but did not differ significantly between the PPG and SPG groups(all P>0.05). The abundance of Comamonadaceae was significantly higher in SPG group than in HCG group(PSymbol|@@0.05), whereas PPG group not differ from either group(all P>0.05).CONCLUSION: Cutibacterium, the representative genus of the propionibacterial group, tends to be enriched in eyes with progressive pterygium, indicating a potential association between this genus and pterygium progression.
2.Current research status of the relationship between ocular surface dysbiosis and the pathogenesis of pterygium
Longlong WANG ; Xinqiu LIU ; Lei MENG ; Ziman HAN
International Eye Science 2025;25(10):1641-1644
Pterygium is a proliferative disorder of the conjunctiva associated with chronic ocular surface inflammation, and the pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. The previous research focusing solely on single pathogens like human papillomavirus(HPV)has shifted towards emphasizing the central role of microbial dysbiosis. Recent studies indicate that ocular surface dysbiosis plays a critical role in the development and progression of pterygium by disrupting ocular surface immune homeostasis. Research has demonstrated that environmental factors(such as ultraviolet radiation, high altitude, and dust exposure)can induce a reduction in microbial diversity and an increased abundance of opportunistic pathogens(such as corynebacterium). This dysbiotic state activates pattern recognition receptors(PRRs), triggering the release of inflammatory cytokines via signaling pathways like NF-κB, thereby initiating chronic ocular surface inflammation. This inflammatory cascade promotes aberrant epithelial proliferation, angiogenesis, and impaired tissue repair, ultimately driving pterygium formation. This review aims to elucidate the pivotal role of the ocular surface microbiota-immune-inflammation axis in pterygium pathogenesis, providing a foundation for exploring more effective prevention and treatment strategies.
3.Analysis of clinical efficacy of LTCBDE in patients with secondary extrahepatic bile duct stones
Mingming HAN ; Bao ZHANG ; Zhuangjie YANG ; Wei ZHAO ; Chunqing DOU ; Ziman ZHU ; Dadong WANG
The Journal of Practical Medicine 2016;32(12):1991-1993
Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LTCBDE) in treatment of patients with secondary extrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods Eighty-seven cases of our hospital patients with secondary to extrahepatic bile duct stones were randomly divided into the laparoscopic bile duct exploration and T tube drainage surgery (LCBDE) treatment group and the laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration of common bile duct lithotomy (ltcbde) treatment group. The observation focused on the operation time, bleeding volume , postoperative transfusion , postoperative drainage time , postoperative hospitalization time , cost of hospitalization, postoperative recovery time and complications compared clinical efficacies. Results LTCBDE group of patients in operation time (2.1 ± 0.5) was longer than that of the control group (1.6 ± 0.4), (P <0.001), while the bleeding volume, postoperative fluid volume, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative recovery time were (17.4 ± 5.4), (6 550.4 ± 1 076.9), (3.5. 1.6), (4.1 ± 1.7), (12 243.5 ± 2 379.6), (11.3 ± 3.5) were lower than that of the group LCBDE (22.1 ± 7.5), (8 304.2 ± 1 394.8), (32.9 ± 10.4), (6.4 ± 2.4), (14 098.1 ± 2 897.3), (16.1 ± 5.7) P, respectively (P values were defined as 0.001, 0, 0, 0.015, 0.001, 0 individually); LTCBDE group of patients with bile leakage, acute peritonitis rates were 1/46,1/46,in which those were lower than the corresponding LCBDE in 6/41, 7/41 (P values were 0.033, 0.016, separately). Conclusion According to indications, LTCBD surgery has the advantages of less injury, less cost, less complications and so on. It has important significance to improve the condition of patients with secondary extrahepatic bile duct stones.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail