1.Analysis of prognosis and influencing factors for pancreatic cancer originated from and concomitant with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas
Zhongfei ZHU ; Jiachen ZHANG ; Minyi GU ; Bin SONG
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology 2025;25(4):256-261
Objective:To explore the prognostic differences and influencing factors between pancreatic cancer originated from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-termed IC-Ds-and pancreatic cancer concomitant with IPMN (C-PDACs).Methods:Clinical data of 382 patients with pathologically confirmed IPMN who underwent surgical resection in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2016 to January 2022 were collected. According to pathological diagnosis, patients were divided into the IC-Ds group ( n=288) and the C-PDACs group ( n=94). The IC-Ds group was further divided into the colloid carcinoma subgroup and the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup based on pathological typing. Data including age, gender, preoperative CA19-9 level, surgical margin status, lymph node metastasis, pathological grade, T stage, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival follow-up were recorded. The median follow-up time was 35.00 months for IC-Ds patients and 29.00 months for C-PDACs patients. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors were compared between the IC-Ds and C-PDACs groups, as well as between the colloid carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma subgroups. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival were generated. Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, R1 resection margin between the IC-Ds group and the C-PDACs group. However, in the C-PDACs group, 70 cases (74.47%) had elevated preoperative CA19-9, 40 cases (42.55%) had lymph node metastasis, 25 cases (26.60%) were pathologically confirmed as poorly differentiated carcinoma after surgery, and 54 cases (57.45%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; the proportions of all these indicators were higher than those in the IC-Ds group (90/288, 31.25%; 72/288, 25.00%; 32/288, 11.11%; 105/288, 36.46%). In contrast, the proportion of T1 stage in the IC-Ds group was higher (40.97% vs 20.21%), and all these differences were statistically significant (all P value <0.05). Among the 288 patients in the IC-Ds group, 97 cases (33.68%) were colloid carcinoma and 191 cases (66.32%) were ductal adenocarcinoma. There were no significant differences in age, gender, R1 resection margin, proportion of poorly differentiated carcinoma between the two subgroups. However, in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup, 67 cases (35.08%) had elevated preoperative CA19-9, 56 cases (29.32%) had lymph node metastasis confirmed by postoperative pathology, and 80 cases (41.88%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; all these proportions were significantly higher than those in the colloid carcinoma subgroup (23/97, 23.71%; 16/97, 17.02%; 25/97, 26.60%). In addition, the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup had higher proportions of T2 and T3/T4 stages, while the proportion of T1 stage in the colloid carcinoma subgroup (60/97, 61.86%) was significantly higher than that in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup (58/191, 30.37%), with all differences being statistically significant (all P value <0.05). The median survival time was 47.00 months (95% CI 42.91-51.09) in the IC-Ds group and 34.00 months (95% CI 29.67-38.33) in the C-PDACs group. For the IC-Ds subgroups, the median survival time was 59.00 months (95% CI 50.79-67.21) in the colloid carcinoma subgroup and 42.00 months (95% CI 35.15-48.85) in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup. Significant differences in median survival time were observed between the IC-Ds and C-PDACs groups, between the colloid carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma subgroups, and between the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup and the C-PDACs group (all P value <0.01). Conclusions:IC-Ds has a better prognosis than C-PDACs, and there is significant heterogeneity within IC-Ds, indicating different biological behaviors between the two types, which requires the development of targeted diagnosis and treatment strategies.
2.Analysis of prognosis and influencing factors for pancreatic cancer originated from and concomitant with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas
Zhongfei ZHU ; Jiachen ZHANG ; Minyi GU ; Bin SONG
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology 2025;25(4):256-261
Objective:To explore the prognostic differences and influencing factors between pancreatic cancer originated from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-termed IC-Ds-and pancreatic cancer concomitant with IPMN (C-PDACs).Methods:Clinical data of 382 patients with pathologically confirmed IPMN who underwent surgical resection in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2016 to January 2022 were collected. According to pathological diagnosis, patients were divided into the IC-Ds group ( n=288) and the C-PDACs group ( n=94). The IC-Ds group was further divided into the colloid carcinoma subgroup and the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup based on pathological typing. Data including age, gender, preoperative CA19-9 level, surgical margin status, lymph node metastasis, pathological grade, T stage, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival follow-up were recorded. The median follow-up time was 35.00 months for IC-Ds patients and 29.00 months for C-PDACs patients. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors were compared between the IC-Ds and C-PDACs groups, as well as between the colloid carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma subgroups. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival were generated. Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, R1 resection margin between the IC-Ds group and the C-PDACs group. However, in the C-PDACs group, 70 cases (74.47%) had elevated preoperative CA19-9, 40 cases (42.55%) had lymph node metastasis, 25 cases (26.60%) were pathologically confirmed as poorly differentiated carcinoma after surgery, and 54 cases (57.45%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; the proportions of all these indicators were higher than those in the IC-Ds group (90/288, 31.25%; 72/288, 25.00%; 32/288, 11.11%; 105/288, 36.46%). In contrast, the proportion of T1 stage in the IC-Ds group was higher (40.97% vs 20.21%), and all these differences were statistically significant (all P value <0.05). Among the 288 patients in the IC-Ds group, 97 cases (33.68%) were colloid carcinoma and 191 cases (66.32%) were ductal adenocarcinoma. There were no significant differences in age, gender, R1 resection margin, proportion of poorly differentiated carcinoma between the two subgroups. However, in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup, 67 cases (35.08%) had elevated preoperative CA19-9, 56 cases (29.32%) had lymph node metastasis confirmed by postoperative pathology, and 80 cases (41.88%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; all these proportions were significantly higher than those in the colloid carcinoma subgroup (23/97, 23.71%; 16/97, 17.02%; 25/97, 26.60%). In addition, the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup had higher proportions of T2 and T3/T4 stages, while the proportion of T1 stage in the colloid carcinoma subgroup (60/97, 61.86%) was significantly higher than that in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup (58/191, 30.37%), with all differences being statistically significant (all P value <0.05). The median survival time was 47.00 months (95% CI 42.91-51.09) in the IC-Ds group and 34.00 months (95% CI 29.67-38.33) in the C-PDACs group. For the IC-Ds subgroups, the median survival time was 59.00 months (95% CI 50.79-67.21) in the colloid carcinoma subgroup and 42.00 months (95% CI 35.15-48.85) in the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup. Significant differences in median survival time were observed between the IC-Ds and C-PDACs groups, between the colloid carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma subgroups, and between the ductal adenocarcinoma subgroup and the C-PDACs group (all P value <0.01). Conclusions:IC-Ds has a better prognosis than C-PDACs, and there is significant heterogeneity within IC-Ds, indicating different biological behaviors between the two types, which requires the development of targeted diagnosis and treatment strategies.
3.Clinical analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly
Academic Journal of Naval Medical University 2024;45(11):1450-1454
Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)in the elderly and evaluate the safety of LC.Methods A total of 182 patients who underwent LC in our hospital from Jan.2020 to Jan.2022 were enrolled.The clinical data of the course of disease,underlying diseases,operation time,blood loss,complications,length of hospital stay and other clinical data of the elderly group(age≥60 years)and the non-elderly group(age<60 years)were compared,and the characteristics of gallbladder diseases and the experience of safe operation in the elderly were summarized.Results There were 80 elderly patients,including 34 males and 46 females;there were 102 non-elderly patients,including 53 males and 49 females.Compared with the non-elderly group,the operation time in the elderly group was significantly longer([69.04±31.57]min vs[55.29±21.22]min,P<0.05),with more underlying diseases(71.25%[57/80]vs 20.59%[21/102],P<0.05),more patients with previous upper abdominal surgery[7.50%(6/80)vs 0(0/102),P<0.05],more intraoperative blood loss(30.00[10.00,30.00]mL vs 20.00[20.00,50.00]mL,P<0.05),and greater total length of hospital stay([6.10±3.97]d vs[4.89±2.53]d,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative complications or postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups(all P>0.05).Postoperative pathology showed that 2 cases in the elderly group were gallbladder adenomatous hyperplasia with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia,without gallbladder malignant tumor.Conclusion There are many underlying diseases in elderly patients.Controlling the surgical indications properly,careful operation and nursing are important factors for the success of LC in the elderly.
4.Clinical significance of gastroduodenal artery in pancreatic surgery
Jian WANG ; Wenqiang TANG ; Zhongfei ZHU ; Bin SONG
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2023;22(S1):122-125
The gastroduodenal artery (GDA) has an important role in pancreatic surgery. Relevant literature was reviewed and sum-marized in this article, along with practical experiences from our center, in order to provide references for surgeons in dealing with anatomical variations of the GDA and postoperative bleeding. GDA has close relationships with the blood supply of surroun-ding organs and is the most common vessel associated with intra-abdominal bleeding after pancreatic surgery. Therefore, the GDA plays a crucial anatomical role that affects the strategies and approaches of pancreatic surgery . Preoperative assessment of GDA variations can be achieved through CT angio-graphy. During surgery, it is important to identify and dissect the GDA properly and protect its remnants. In cases of residual bleeding from the GDA, endovascular treatment or secondary laparo-tomy can be conducted.
5.Preliminary application of MR diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosing and evaluating therapeutic effect of autoimmune pancreatitis
Jiacheng ZHANG ; Chen ZHANG ; Zhenghan YANG ; Weilin TANG ; Jinzhou FANG ; Zhongfei XU ; Ye TAN ; Jie ZHU ; Min CHEN ; Cheng ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2014;(6):484-488
Objective To investigate the role of DWI in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis ( AIP) from pancreatic cancer ( PC) , and in the therapeutic effect evaluation of AIP.Methods DWI data of 26 cases with AIP , 29 cases with PC and 30 cases with normal pancreas ( NP ) were analyzed retrospectively.The distribution type and signal feature of lesions in cases with AIP or PC were evaluated by Chi-squared test.ADC values were measured and compared among 3 groups by Kruskal-Wallis test.ADC values of AIP and PC were analyzed by using ROC curve to determine the optimal threshold and diagnostic efficiency.ADC values were compared in AIP ( n=15 ) before and after steroid therapy by paired t test.Results Diffuse lesions were detected in 21 cases with AIP and 3 cases with PC, while focal lesions in 5 cases with AIP and 26 cases with PC (χ2 =27.64, P<0.01).On DWI, most of AIP (n=19) and PC (n=24) showed hyper-intense signal, while a few of AIP (n=7) and PC (n =5) showed iso-intense signal (χ2 =0.75, P>0.05).The median ADC values of AIP, PC and NP were 1.15 ×10 -3,1.35 × 10 -3 ,1.59 ×10-3 mm2/s, respectively; and the difference was statistically significant ( H=45.60, P <0.01).ROC analysis yielded an optimal ADC cutoff value of 1.255 ×10 -3 mm2/s (80.8% sensitivity, 79.3%specificity and 0.871 area under curve for the diagnosis of AIP ).ADC values of AIP ( n=15) were markedly increased from the baseline (1.10 ±0.19) ×10 -3 to (1.57 ±0.12) ×10 -3 mm2/s after steroid therapy (t=-10.14, P<0.01).Conclusions DWI may be useful for diagnosing and evaluating the effect of steroid therapy in AIP.ADC values of AIP were significantly lower than those of pancreatic cancer and normal pancreas.After steroid therapy , ADC values were markedly increased in AIP.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail