Objective:To compare bowel function 12 months after surgery between side-to-end anastomosis (SEA) and end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) groups of patients who had undergone rectal cancer resection.Methods:This single-center, prospective, open-label, phase III randomized controlled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (2018PHB040-01) and registered at ClinicalTrials. org (NCT03669237). Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma; (2) tumor located 0 to 12 cm from the anal verge; (3) age≥18 years; and (4) planned R0 resection with primary reconstruction. Exclusion criteria included: (1) emergency surgery; (2) cognitive impairment; (3) non-primary anastomosis; (4) history of left-sided colonic or anorectal surgery; and (5) preexisting chronic defecation dysfunction. Eligible rectal cancer patients scheduled for elective sphincter-preserving surgery at Peking University People's Hospital were prospectively enrolled between October 2018 and March 2021 and randomly assigned to either the EEA group or the SEA group via computer-generated numbers prior to entering the operating room. All patients underwent standard radical tumor resection. Bowel function was evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaire. It consists of five single-choice questions and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 42. Defecation function is categorized into three levels: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points), and major LARS (30-42 points). The primary endpoint was the LARS score 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints included LARS scores from 1 to 11 months and during long-term follow-up(>12 months). The final follow-up was completed in July 2022. All randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat set (ITTS). The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as ITTS patients with valid outcome data. All primary statistical analyses were performed in the FAS, and results were further compared in the per-protocol set (PPS) based on the actual treatment received.Results:A total of 323 patients underwent eligibility assessment, of whom 71 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 52 declined to participate. Ultimately, 200 patients were randomized. Median age was 64 years and 85 were women. The SEA and EEA groups comprised 102 and 98 patients, respectively. A total of 181 patients (90.5%) were included in the FAS, and 170 (85.0%) were included in the PPS. Among these, the 12-month LARS score was evaluated in 178 patients (98.3%) in the FAS and in 167 (98.2%) in the PPS. Median LARS score at 1–12 months were significantly lower in the SEA group in both the FAS dataset [12 months:8 (interquartile range [IQR], 0–22) vs. 14 (IQR, 8–29); Z=2.687, P=0.007] and the PPS dataset [12 months: 8 (IQR, 0–22) vs. 14 (IQR, 6–29); Z=2.543, P=0.011]. During long-term follow-up, the median LARS score was also significantly lower in the SEA group in the FAS dataset [2 (IQR, 0–4) vs. 11 (IQR, 2–23); Z=2.968, P=0.003] and the PPS dataset [2 (IQR, 0–14) vs. 11 (2, 27); Z=2.687, P=0.007]. Conclusion:Compared with the EEA group, bowel function was superior in the SEA group 1 year after surgery and during long-term follow-up.

Objective:To investigate the learning curves of gastroscopy and colonoscopy for surgeons.Methods:Clinical data of ordinary digestive endoscopy performed by gastrointestinal surgeons in Peking University People's Hospital from March, 2022 to March, 2024 were collected retrospectively. Learning curves were plotted according to the number of examinations and learning time, and the cumulative sum control chart method was used to determine the number of cases required to achieve proficiency in endoscopic examination.Results:Six gastrointestinal surgeons (sequentially) received training in gastroscopy and colonoscopy. All surgeons were male physicians with a doctoral degree and the professional title of attending physician. The average age was (33.0 ±1.9) years, and the average job tenure was (4.0±1.8) years. The median time required for proficiency in gastroscopy was 31 weeks, with a median number of cases of 624. Similarly, the median time required for proficiency in colonoscopy was also 31 weeks but with a median number of cases of 470.Conclusions:Surgeons need at least 31 weeks of independent operation to become proficient in endoscopic examination and more than 600 cases to be proficient in gastroscopy. Surgeons with gastroscopy experience also need 31 weeks of independent operation but at least 450 cases to become proficient in colonoscopy.

Objective To investigate the acceptance and satisfaction of tuberculosis prevention and control personnel in Beijing with the patient management system, and to provide a basis for further improving the patient management model. Methods A survey was conducted on the current usage, satisfaction, willingness to use and system improvement opinions of the patient management system among medical staff involved in the supervision and medication management of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Beijing. Results A total of 360 medical staff participated in the survey. ^“Patient management^” was the function with the largest number of users, accounting for 96.94%. The proportion of users of each module who believed that the module's design met actual work needs was over 90%. About 94.44% of respondents believed that patient management systems facilitated the transfer and sharing of information between institutions. And 90.83% of respondents thought that the patient management system was easy to operate, and 89.17% of respondents believed that patient management systems reduced workload. About 97.50% of respondents were satisfied with the overall use of the patient management system. The results of the influencing factor analysis showed that those with 3 or less modules designed to meet actual work were less satisfied than those with more than 3 modules, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). Respondents put forward suggestions for improvement on the optimization of operational details such as system response speed, interface design, system login and query statistics. Conclusion Medical staff involved in the follow-up management of pulmonary tuberculosis patients are highly satisfied with their work using the patient management system. During the promotion and use, it is still necessary to continuously optimize the system functions according to work needs so that the system can truly facilitate work.

Objective:To compare bowel function 12 months after surgery between side-to-end anastomosis (SEA) and end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) groups of patients who had undergone rectal cancer resection.Methods:This single-center, prospective, open-label, phase III randomized controlled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (2018PHB040-01) and registered at ClinicalTrials. org (NCT03669237). Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma; (2) tumor located 0 to 12 cm from the anal verge; (3) age≥18 years; and (4) planned R0 resection with primary reconstruction. Exclusion criteria included: (1) emergency surgery; (2) cognitive impairment; (3) non-primary anastomosis; (4) history of left-sided colonic or anorectal surgery; and (5) preexisting chronic defecation dysfunction. Eligible rectal cancer patients scheduled for elective sphincter-preserving surgery at Peking University People's Hospital were prospectively enrolled between October 2018 and March 2021 and randomly assigned to either the EEA group or the SEA group via computer-generated numbers prior to entering the operating room. All patients underwent standard radical tumor resection. Bowel function was evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaire. It consists of five single-choice questions and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 42. Defecation function is categorized into three levels: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points), and major LARS (30-42 points). The primary endpoint was the LARS score 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints included LARS scores from 1 to 11 months and during long-term follow-up(>12 months). The final follow-up was completed in July 2022. All randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat set (ITTS). The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as ITTS patients with valid outcome data. All primary statistical analyses were performed in the FAS, and results were further compared in the per-protocol set (PPS) based on the actual treatment received.Results:A total of 323 patients underwent eligibility assessment, of whom 71 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 52 declined to participate. Ultimately, 200 patients were randomized. Median age was 64 years and 85 were women. The SEA and EEA groups comprised 102 and 98 patients, respectively. A total of 181 patients (90.5%) were included in the FAS, and 170 (85.0%) were included in the PPS. Among these, the 12-month LARS score was evaluated in 178 patients (98.3%) in the FAS and in 167 (98.2%) in the PPS. Median LARS score at 1–12 months were significantly lower in the SEA group in both the FAS dataset [12 months:8 (interquartile range [IQR], 0–22) vs. 14 (IQR, 8–29); Z=2.687, P=0.007] and the PPS dataset [12 months: 8 (IQR, 0–22) vs. 14 (IQR, 6–29); Z=2.543, P=0.011]. During long-term follow-up, the median LARS score was also significantly lower in the SEA group in the FAS dataset [2 (IQR, 0–4) vs. 11 (IQR, 2–23); Z=2.968, P=0.003] and the PPS dataset [2 (IQR, 0–14) vs. 11 (2, 27); Z=2.687, P=0.007]. Conclusion:Compared with the EEA group, bowel function was superior in the SEA group 1 year after surgery and during long-term follow-up.

Objective:To investigate the learning curves of gastroscopy and colonoscopy for surgeons.Methods:Clinical data of ordinary digestive endoscopy performed by gastrointestinal surgeons in Peking University People's Hospital from March, 2022 to March, 2024 were collected retrospectively. Learning curves were plotted according to the number of examinations and learning time, and the cumulative sum control chart method was used to determine the number of cases required to achieve proficiency in endoscopic examination.Results:Six gastrointestinal surgeons (sequentially) received training in gastroscopy and colonoscopy. All surgeons were male physicians with a doctoral degree and the professional title of attending physician. The average age was (33.0 ±1.9) years, and the average job tenure was (4.0±1.8) years. The median time required for proficiency in gastroscopy was 31 weeks, with a median number of cases of 624. Similarly, the median time required for proficiency in colonoscopy was also 31 weeks but with a median number of cases of 470.Conclusions:Surgeons need at least 31 weeks of independent operation to become proficient in endoscopic examination and more than 600 cases to be proficient in gastroscopy. Surgeons with gastroscopy experience also need 31 weeks of independent operation but at least 450 cases to become proficient in colonoscopy.

Lymphatic metastasis is one of the main pathways of colorectal cancer spread and also a crucial factor in patient long-term prognosis. Lymph node dissection in the possible tumor drainage area, particularly the central group of lymph nodes at the root of the tumor-associated supplying artery, is a key and challenging aspect of surgical techniques. Currently, the patterns of lymphatic drainage and the distribution of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer are not well illustrated, and there is no consensus on the necessity and extent of central lymph node dissection. This has led to significant variability in the extent of lymph node dissection among different surgeons in clinical practice, a lack of quality control standards for surgical procedures, and impacts on postoperative treatment strategy and long-term outcomes. Moreover, current research on lymphatic drainage and metastasis is primarily based on traditional anatomy, whereas individualized, precise approaches to lymph node dissection have not been realized. The application of preoperative and intraoperative lymph node imaging techniques based on functional anatomy in colorectal cancer patients is still under exploration.

Since the concept of GIST was proposed in 1983, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST in China have continuously progress. Over the two decades from 1990 to 2010, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST had achieved a foundation of development through the collective efforts of GIST scholars, from the first pathological review to the first expert consensus. The period from 2010 to 2020 marked rapid development. Besides the updates of expert consensus, other relevant expert consensus was published regarding pathology, surgery, targeted therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring, and patient' management. Based on the above development, China's first GIST guideline, the "CSCO Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2020 Edition)", was published. This guideline considers regional development disparities, accessibility of treatments and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer care, maintaining its scientific rigor, fairness, and timeliness. Over the past 30 years, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST in China significantly development. However, we should recognize that further development must require more original Chinese research, which would better benefit the Chinese population.

Objective:To investigate the prognosis and the factors that influence it in patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who are at low risk of recurrence.Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study. Clinicopathologic and prognostic data from patients with non-gastric GISTs and at low risk of recurrence (i.e., very low-risk or low-risk according to the 2008 version of the Modified NIH Risk Classification), who attended 18 medical centers in China between January 2000 and June 2023, were collected. We excluded patients with a history of prior malignancy, concurrent primary malignancy, multiple GISTs, and those who had received preoperative imatinib. The study cohort comprised 1,571 patients with GISTs, 370 (23.6%) of whom were at very low-risk and 1,201 (76.4%) at low-risk of recurrence. The cohort included 799 (50.9%) men and 772 (49.1%) women of median age 57 (16–93) years. Patients were followed up to July 2024. The prognosis and its influencing factors were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves for tumor diameter and Ki67 were established, and the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cut-off value with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Propensity score matching was implemented using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method with a matching tolerance of 0.02.Results:With a median follow-up of 63 (12–267) months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates of the 1,571 patients were 99.5% and 98.0%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.3% and 94.4%, respectively. During postoperative follow-up, 3.8% (60/1,571) patients had disease recurrence or metastasis, comprising 0.8% (3/370) in the very low-risk group and 4.7% (57/1,201) in the low-risk group. In the low-risk group, recurrence or metastasis occurred in 5.5% (25/457) of patients with duodenal GISTs, 3.9% (25/645) of those with small intestinal GISTs, 9.2% (6/65) of those with rectal GISTs, and 10.0% (1/10) of those with colonic GISTs. Among the 60 patients with metastases, 56.7% (34/60) of the metastases were located in the abdominal cavity, 53.3% (32/60) in the liver, and 3.3% (2/60) in bone. During the follow-up period, 13 patients (0.8%) died of disease. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for tumor diameter and Ki67 and assessed using the Jordon index. This showed that the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.670–0.793, sensitivity 77.7%, specificity 64.1%). Furthermore, the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for Ki67 was 5% (AUC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.624–0.762, sensitivity 60.7%, specificity 65.3%). Multifactorial analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥3.5 cm, Ki67 ≥5%, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for DFS in patients with non-gastric GISTs at low risk of recurrence (all P<0.05). Furthermore, age >57 years, Ki67 ≥5%, and R1 resection were also independent risk factors for OS in patients with non-gastric GISTs at low risk of recurrence (all P<0.05). We also grouped the patients according to whether they had received postoperative adjuvant treatment with imatinib for 1 or 3 years. This yielded 137 patients in the less than 1-year group, 139 in the 1-year plus group; and 44 in both the less than 3 years and 3-years plus group. After propensity score matching for age, tumor diameter, Ki67, and resection status, the differences in survival between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The 10-year DFS and OS were 87.5% and 95.5%, respectively, in the group treated with imatinib for less than 1 year and 88.5% and 97.8%, respectively, in the group treated for more than 1 year. The 10-year DFS and OS were 89.6% and 92.6%, respectively, in the group treated with imatinib for less than 3 years and 88.0% and 100.0%, respectively, in the group treated with imatinib for more than 3 years. Conclusion:The overall prognosis of primary, non-gastric, low recurrence risk GISTs is relatively favorable; however, recurrences and metastases do occur. Age, tumor diameter, Ki67, and R1 resection may affect the prognosis. For some patients with low risk GISTs, administration of adjuvant therapy with imatinib for an appropriate duration may help prevent recurrence and improve survival.

Lymphatic metastasis is one of the main pathways of colorectal cancer spread and also a crucial factor in patient long-term prognosis. Lymph node dissection in the possible tumor drainage area, particularly the central group of lymph nodes at the root of the tumor-associated supplying artery, is a key and challenging aspect of surgical techniques. Currently, the patterns of lymphatic drainage and the distribution of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer are not well illustrated, and there is no consensus on the necessity and extent of central lymph node dissection. This has led to significant variability in the extent of lymph node dissection among different surgeons in clinical practice, a lack of quality control standards for surgical procedures, and impacts on postoperative treatment strategy and long-term outcomes. Moreover, current research on lymphatic drainage and metastasis is primarily based on traditional anatomy, whereas individualized, precise approaches to lymph node dissection have not been realized. The application of preoperative and intraoperative lymph node imaging techniques based on functional anatomy in colorectal cancer patients is still under exploration.

Since the concept of GIST was proposed in 1983, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST in China have continuously progress. Over the two decades from 1990 to 2010, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST had achieved a foundation of development through the collective efforts of GIST scholars, from the first pathological review to the first expert consensus. The period from 2010 to 2020 marked rapid development. Besides the updates of expert consensus, other relevant expert consensus was published regarding pathology, surgery, targeted therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring, and patient' management. Based on the above development, China's first GIST guideline, the "CSCO Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2020 Edition)", was published. This guideline considers regional development disparities, accessibility of treatments and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer care, maintaining its scientific rigor, fairness, and timeliness. Over the past 30 years, the diagnosis and treatment of GIST in China significantly development. However, we should recognize that further development must require more original Chinese research, which would better benefit the Chinese population.