Background and aims:Antiviral therapy is essential for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure(HBV-ACLF).No data are available on the long-term prognosis or safety of tenofovir alafenamide(TAF),tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF),or entecavir(ETV)in treating HBV-ACLF globally.This study was conducted to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the three nucleos(t)ide analogs in the treatment of HBV-ACLF.Methods:In this prospective,real-world cohort study,patients with HBV-ACLF were assigned to the TAF,TDF,and ETV groups.A total of 199 patients completed the 144-week follow-up.After propensity score matching(PSM),44 patients remained in each group for further analysis of survival status,incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),virological response,and liver and renal function indicators.Results:In the original cohort,HCC developed in one patient in each group.No serious drug-related adverse events were observed.In the PSM cohort,the 144-week survival rates were 56.82％,75.00％,and 59.09％in the TAF,TDF,and ETV groups,respectively(P=0.118).When stratified into noncirrhosis and cirrhosis subgroups at baseline,the survival rate of the ETV group was slightly lower than that of the TAF and TDF group in noncirrhosis patients(P=0.338),and the survival rate of the TAF group was slightly lower than that of the TDF and ETV group in cirrhosis patients(P=0.052),but the differences were not statistically significant.The long-term overall survival rates in the TAF,TDF,and ETV groups were comparable.After 144 weeks,no significant difference in the virological response rate or liver or renal function indicators was found among the three groups,except for the level of aspartate amino-transferase,which was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group at week 144(P=0.001).Conclusions:There were no significant differences in the survival rate,incidence of HCC,efficacy or safety associated with the use of these three nucleos(t)ide analogs in treating HBV-ACLF.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03920618.

ObjectiveTo investigate the association of Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) response with the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial embolization (TACE). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 190 patients with unresectable HCC who were consecutively admitted to Department of Liver Disease and Digestive Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, and treated with TACE from January 2010 to December 2014. The mRECIST criteria were used to evaluate imaging response after TACE; the patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) were enrolled as response group(n=89), and those with progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD) were enrolled as non-response group(n=101). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median survival time, and the log-rank test was used for comparison between groups; the Cox regression model was used to identify the influencing factors for prognosis. ResultsAccording to the mRECIST criteria, 39 patients (20.5%) achieved CR, 50 (26.3%) achieved PR, 67 (35.3%) had SD, and 34 (17.9%) had PD. The objective response rate based on mRECIST was 46.8% for the whole population. The response group had a significantly longer survival time than the non-response group, and the median survival time was 29.9 (95% confidence interval ［CI］: 25.0-34.8) months for the response group and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.7-9.3) months for the non-response group (P＜0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that mRECIST response (hazard ratio ［HR］=2.02, P＜0.001), hepatitis B (HR=4.03, P＜0.001), and portal invasion (HR=2.12, P=0.008) were independent risk factors for survival. ConclusionThe mRECIST response has a certain value in predicting the prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC after TACE.

64 patients with severe chronic periodontitis were divided into 2 groups(n =32)randomly.Intramuscular injection of ketorolac tromethamine(KT group)and local block injection of lidocaine(L group)were respectively applied for periodontal subgingival scaling and root planning.The analgesic effect was assessed using VAS,the adverse drug reactions were recorded during and after operation.During op-eration the VAS between the 2 groups was not statistically different(P >0.05).6 and 1 2 h after operation the VAS of KT group was lower than that of L group(P <0.05).During operation minor intraoperative local adverse reactions were observed in all cases in L group,but not any in KT group(P <0.05);after operation minor adverse reactions were observed in 1 case of KT group and in 2 cases of L group(P >0. 05).