INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have informed guideline recommendations for the management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the real-world impact of contemporary guidelines and trials on practising physicians in the Asia-Pacific region remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices among cardiovascular physicians in the region regarding stable CAD management. METHOD: An anonymised cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to cardiovascular practitioners from the Asia Pacific, assessing 3 domains: 1) baseline knowledge on recent trials and society guideline, 2) attitudes towards stable CAD, and 3) case scenarios reflecting management preferences. Correlations among knowledge, attitudes and practice scores were assessed between physicians from developed and developing countries using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Overall, 713 respondents from 21 countries completed the survey. The mean knowledge score was 2.90±1.18 (out of 4), with 37.3% of respondents answering all questions correctly, while 74.6% noted that guidelines have significant impact on their practice. Despite guidelines recommending optimal medical therapy, majority chose revascularisation (range 53.4- 90.6%) as the preferred strategy for the case scenarios. Practitioners from developed regions had higher knowledge scores and lower attitude scores compared to developing regions, while practice scores were similar in both groups. Weakly positive correlations were noted between knowledge, attitude and practice scores. CONCLUSION Variations exist in knowledge and attitudes towards guideline recommendations and correspondingly actual clinical practice in the Asia Pacific, with most practitioners choosing an upfront invasive strategy for the treatment of stable CAD. These differences reflect real-world disparities in guideline interpretation and clinical adoption.
Humans ; Coronary Artery Disease/therapy* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data* ; Asia ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Male ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Female ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Middle Aged ; Developing Countries

INTRODUCTION: Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a recognised treatment option for selected patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD G5), but prognostic indicators for mortality and optimal timing for palliative care transition remain uncertain. METHOD: This is a single-centre, prospective cohort study of CKD G5 patients who opted for CKM, conducted between April 2021 and September 2024, with longitudinal monitoring of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal; Palliative Perfor-mance Scale (PPS); Resources Utilisation Group.Activities of Daily Living (RUG-ADL) scale; Clinical Frailty Score; Karnofsky Performance Score; and clinical and laboratory data. Primary outcomes included identifying baseline mortality predictors and validating the PPS for survival estimation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Among 109 patients (mean age 79.8±7.3 years, 64.2% female), 62 (56.9%) died during follow-up. Multivariate analysis identified baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08.1.68, P<0.01) and serum albumin (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08.1.43, P<0.01) as predictors of 1-year mortality. Median survival varied by eGFR: 3.0 months (95% CI 0.6.2) for eGFR .5 mL/min/1.73 m², 13.0 months (95% CI 9.1.16.9) for eGFR 6.10 mL/ min/1.73 m², and 20.0 months (95% CI 16.5.23.5) for eGFR >10 mL/min/1.73 m² (P<0.01). Subsequent PPS correlated strongly with survival, with median survival of 1.8 months for PPS <50, 5.3 months for PPS 50.60, and 7.9 months for PPS 70.80 (P=0.03). CONCLUSION Baseline eGFR and serum albumin predict 1-year mortality in CKM patients. PPS offers a practical tool for identifying patients requiring palliative care transition, supporting personalised care pathways and timely integration of palliative care.
Humans ; Female ; Male ; Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Palliative Care/methods* ; Conservative Treatment/methods* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Prognosis ; Serum Albumin/analysis* ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Activities of Daily Living ; Singapore/epidemiology*

Jiegengtang is a basic formula for treating sore throat and cough. By means of bibliometrics， this study conducted a textual research and analysis on the key information such as formula origin， decocting methods， and clinical application of Jiegengtang. After the research， it can be seen that Jiegengtang is firstly contained in Treatise on Febrile and Miscellaneous Disease， which is also known as Ganjietang， and it has been inherited and innovated by medical practitioners of various dynasties in later times. The origins of Chinese medicines in this formula is basically clear， Jiegeng is the dried roots of Platycodon grandiflorum， Gancao is the dried roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza uralensis， the two medicines are selected raw products. The dosage is 27.60 g of Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma and 13.80 g of Platycodonis Radix， decocted with 600 mL of water to 200 mL， taken warmly after meals， twice a day， 100 mL for each time. In ancient times， Jiegengtang was mainly used for treating Shaoyin-heat invasion syndrome， with cough and sore throat as its core symptoms. In modern clinical practice， Jiegengtang is mainly used for respiratory diseases such as pharyngitis， esophagitis， tonsillitis and lung abscess， especially for pharyngitis and lung abscess with remarkable efficacy. This paper can provide literature reference basis for the modern clinical application and new drug development of Jiegengtang.

Jiegengtang is a basic formula for treating sore throat and cough. By means of bibliometrics， this study conducted a textual research and analysis on the key information such as formula origin， decocting methods， and clinical application of Jiegengtang. After the research， it can be seen that Jiegengtang is firstly contained in Treatise on Febrile and Miscellaneous Disease， which is also known as Ganjietang， and it has been inherited and innovated by medical practitioners of various dynasties in later times. The origins of Chinese medicines in this formula is basically clear， Jiegeng is the dried roots of Platycodon grandiflorum， Gancao is the dried roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza uralensis， the two medicines are selected raw products. The dosage is 27.60 g of Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma and 13.80 g of Platycodonis Radix， decocted with 600 mL of water to 200 mL， taken warmly after meals， twice a day， 100 mL for each time. In ancient times， Jiegengtang was mainly used for treating Shaoyin-heat invasion syndrome， with cough and sore throat as its core symptoms. In modern clinical practice， Jiegengtang is mainly used for respiratory diseases such as pharyngitis， esophagitis， tonsillitis and lung abscess， especially for pharyngitis and lung abscess with remarkable efficacy. This paper can provide literature reference basis for the modern clinical application and new drug development of Jiegengtang.

Objective To explore the correlation between glycemic control and complexity of drug treatment regimens in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods A retrospective,cross-sectional study was conducted to collect the elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were hospitalized in the Department of Endocrinology at the Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2022 to December 2024.The clinical characteristics and medication compliance of the patients were recorded through pharmaceutical consultations.The medication regimen complexity index(MRCI)and diabetes-specific medication regimen complexity index(D-MRCI)were calculated for each patient.Patients were divided into the target-achieving group and the non-target-achieving group based on whether their blood glucose met the criteria.Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to identify the factors associated with adequate blood glucose control.Results A total of 152 patients were included,123(80.9%)had poorer glycemic control,31.6%exhibited good medication adherence,and 76.3%demonstrated good adherence to diabetes medications.The mean total MRCI score was(25.90±8.63),while the median D-MRCI score was 9.00(5.25,11.75),with 44.7%of patients classified as having high D-MRCI scores(D-MRCI>9).The results of Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the number of medications used by patients was highly correlated with the MRCI score(r=0.899,P<0.001),while the number of diabetes medications used was highly correlated with the D-MRCI score(r=0.705,P<0.001).Univariate analysis results revealed that high complexity diabetes medication regimen,duration of diabetes,the number of types of antidiabetic drugs,and the number of injectable antidiabetic medications were associated with glycemic control(P≤0.05).Multivariate analysis results showed that,high diabetes medication complexity was an independent risk factor for inadequate blood glucose control[OR=4.119,95%CI(1.121,15.139),P=0.033].Conclusion Higher D-MRCI(>9)was associated with poorer glycemic control.Simplifying medication regimens and optimizing medication management strategies may improve patient outcomes.

To standardize the management of medication errors in medical institutions,the Pharmaceutical Specialized Committee of the Chinese Hospital Association led the formulation of the Pharmacy Management—Adverse Drug Reaction Manage-ment—Medication Error Management.The formulation process referred to national regulations,policies,books,and consensus on medication error management.This article described the development process of this standard and provided an in-depth analysis of its key contents.It aimed to guide and inform medical institutions,helping them thoroughly understand and master the requirements for medication error management.The article enhanced the management of medication errors and ensured the safety and effective-ness of medication.

To standardize the management of adverse drug reactions in medical institutions and ensure medicine safety,based on relevant national regulations,normative documents,international and domestic adverse drug reaction management guide-lines,and expert opinions,the Chinese Hospital Association Pharmaceutical Specialized Committee led the development of the ad-verse drug reaction management standard.This article elaborated on the formulation process of this standard and provides an in-depth analysis of its key contents.It aimed to offer guidance and reference for medical personnel,helping them to thoroughly under-stand and master the management requirements of adverse drug reactions,thereby enhancing the management level of adverse drug reactions and ensuring the safe use of medications for patients.

Organizational and institutional management plays a pivotal role in the pharmaceutical management of medi-cal institutions.Strengthening management in this area significantly enhances the quality of medical services and promotes the standardization,refinement,and scientific management of hospitals at all levels and types.To achieve homogenization in organiza-tional and institutional management,the Pharmaceutical Specialized Committee,Chinese Hospital Association compilation team adhered to principles of scientific,universality,instructiveness,and operability.After in-depth problem sorting,extensive opinion collection,and rigorous expert deliberation,we have formulated the first domestic group standard for regulating the organizational and institutional systems of pharmaceutical management in medical institutions.This article aims to detail the process of formula-ting this standard and to provide an in-depth analysis of its content,hoping to offer valuable advice and guidance for the construc-tion of organizational and institutional management in pharmaceutical affairs for medical institutions of all levels and types.

Aim To explore the predictive value of stress hyperglycemia ratio(SHR)for in-hospital mortality and mechanical complications in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).Methods This study constituted a retrospective investigation that collected 995 patients diagnosed with acute STEMI at Suining Central Hospital from June 2019 to July 2023.Comparisons of baseline data were conducted using t-test,Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test;Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between SHR and the risk of in-hospital mortality and mechanical complications in acute STEMI patients;Restricted cubic spline analysis based on the Logistic re-gression model was utilized to explore non-linear relationship between SHR and the risk of in-hospital mortality and mechan-ical complications;ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of SHR;Subgroup analysis was used to assess the predictive efficacy of SHR in each subgroup.Results Patients with high SHR had a significantly higher cardiovas-cular mortality(P=0.007).High SHR was an independent risk factor for in-hospital all-cause mortality(Model 1:OR=3.085,95％ CI:1.719～5.538,P＜0.001;Model 2:OR=2.738,95％ CI:1.4439～5.132,P=0.002),cardiovascular mortality(Model 1:OR=3.406,95％ CI:1.869～6.228,P＜0.001;Model 2:OR=3.053,95％ CI:1.595～5.817,P＜0.001),ventricular aneurysm(Model 1:OR=3.203,95％CI:1.665～6.069,P＜0.001;Model2:OR=3.93,95％CI:1.785～8.663,P＜0.001),cardiac rupture(Model 1:OR=2.461,95％ CI:1.389～4.312,P=0.002;Model 2:OR=2.302,95％ CI:1.214～4.274,P=0.009)and composite endpoint(Model 1:OR=3.719,95％ CI:2.226～6.332,P＜0.001;Model 2:OR=2.919,95％ CI:1.576～5.405,P＜0.001)in patients with acute STEMI.SHR was positively correlated in a linear relationship with the risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality(P for non-linearity=0.250),cardiovascular mortality(P for non-linearity=0.129),ventricular aneurysm(P for non-linearity=0.588),cardiac rupture(P for non-linearity=0.787)and composite endpoint(P for non-linearity=0.399).The SHR had excellent diagnostic efficacy for in-hospital all-cause mortality(AUC=0.694),cardiovascular mortality(AUC=0.697),ventricular aneurysm(AUC=0.706),cardiac rupture(AUC=0.667)and composite endpoint(AUC=0.730),meanwhile SHR predicted efficacy consistently across subgroups.Conclusions High SHR is an independent risk factor for in-hospital all-cause mortality,cardiovascular mortality and cardiac mechanical complications in patients with a-cute STEMI.SHR holds significant predictive value for the prognosis of patients with STEMI.

Objective To retrieve,evaluate and summarise the best evidence on screening and management of psychological distress in patients who had ostomy for colorectal cancer.Methods Literatures on psychological distress screening and management in patients undergoing colorectal cancer ostomy were systematically searched across various websites and databases of home and abroad from inception to 20th June,2024 including Cochrane Library,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,Web of Science,CNKI,Wangfang,VIP,UpToDate,National Guideline Clearing-house,National Comprehensive Cancer Network,the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,the International Guideline Collaboration Network,Wound,Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society,World Council of Enterostomal Therapists,Medlive,Chinese Nursing Association.The search aimed to identify evidence on psychological distress screening and management in patients with colorectal cancer and stomas,including guidelines,evidence summaries,expert consensuses,systematic reviews,and Meta-analyses.The search was limited to articles published from the inception of each database to 20th June,2024.The searched literature included guidelines,evidence summary,expert consensus,systematic review,meta-analysis,etc..Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of literature and extracted evidences,as well as checked and integrated the evidences together with a panel of evidence-based research experts.Results A total of 14 articles were included,comprising four guidelines,one expert consensus,two evidence summaries,four meta-analyses and three systematic reviews.The articles encompassed 7 dimensions with a total of 18 pieces of evidence,including one in screening timing,one in screening tools,3 in screening content,3 in drug intervention,3 in self-management,5 in psychological support and 2 in health education.Conclusion The evidence summarised in this study on the screening and management of psychological distress in patients who had ostomy for colorectal cancer is scientifically comprehensive.It provides an evidence-based basis for medical staff in prevention and management of psychological distress in patients.It is necessary to formulate a scientific management plan in clinical practice,according to the specific requirements of departments,the patients and their family members.