This tutorial addresses the current lack of standardized protocols for closed reduction and cast immobilization for distal radius fractures in China, along with a high incidence of the complications of these fractures. Based on the 2024 Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Distal Radius Fractures, it establishes a standardized operational procedure. Using the classic Colles fracture as an example, it provides a comprehensive and step-by-step explanations of the closed reduction and cast immobilization techniques, including detailed descriptions and schematic illustrations covering patient positioning, measurement, reduction maneuvers, cast fabrication, cast application, molding, and assessment.

Objective:To report construction of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) using the Delphi method.Methods:Literature related to the study of adult distal radius fractures was fully searched for and evaluated. An expert group was established from representative experts from all over the nation. The related clinical issues were established by consulting the experts in the form of electronic questionnaires, strictly following the Delphi research method. After the first draft of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) was written, an expert consultation questionnaire was designed for the recommendation opinions to determine the recommendation strength.Results:The clinical issues were determined by 2 rounds of correspondence based on the Delphi method. For the both rounds of correspondence, the questionnaire recovery rates were respectively 88.68% (47/53) and 98.11% (52/53), and the expert authority coefficients >0.7. According to the screening criteria based on the importance of clinical issues (mean importance score <3.5 points or a coefficient of variation ≥0.25 points and a full score ratio <30%) and expert opinions, a total of 40 clinical issues were deleted in the first round of determination of clinical issues, and a total of 5 clinical issues deleted in the second round of determination of clinical issues. The reliability analysis of the results of the 2 rounds of questionnaires showed that the Cronbach α coefficient was >0.9. In the questionnaire to determine the recommendation strength, according to the screening criteria for the consistency of recommendation strength (consistency ≥ 70%) and expert opinions, a total of 26 recommendations were screened in the first round. In the second round when the remaining 4 recommendations were investigated, one recommendation reached the consistency of recommendation strength ≥ 70%. Eventually, 27 recommendations were formed.Conclusion:The Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) constructed using the Delphi method shows good scientific validity, authority, and reliability, providing methodological references for guideline development and research.

This tutorial addresses the current lack of standardized protocols for closed reduction and cast immobilization for distal radius fractures in China, along with a high incidence of the complications of these fractures. Based on the 2024 Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Distal Radius Fractures, it establishes a standardized operational procedure. Using the classic Colles fracture as an example, it provides a comprehensive and step-by-step explanations of the closed reduction and cast immobilization techniques, including detailed descriptions and schematic illustrations covering patient positioning, measurement, reduction maneuvers, cast fabrication, cast application, molding, and assessment.

Objective:To report construction of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) using the Delphi method.Methods:Literature related to the study of adult distal radius fractures was fully searched for and evaluated. An expert group was established from representative experts from all over the nation. The related clinical issues were established by consulting the experts in the form of electronic questionnaires, strictly following the Delphi research method. After the first draft of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) was written, an expert consultation questionnaire was designed for the recommendation opinions to determine the recommendation strength.Results:The clinical issues were determined by 2 rounds of correspondence based on the Delphi method. For the both rounds of correspondence, the questionnaire recovery rates were respectively 88.68% (47/53) and 98.11% (52/53), and the expert authority coefficients >0.7. According to the screening criteria based on the importance of clinical issues (mean importance score <3.5 points or a coefficient of variation ≥0.25 points and a full score ratio <30%) and expert opinions, a total of 40 clinical issues were deleted in the first round of determination of clinical issues, and a total of 5 clinical issues deleted in the second round of determination of clinical issues. The reliability analysis of the results of the 2 rounds of questionnaires showed that the Cronbach α coefficient was >0.9. In the questionnaire to determine the recommendation strength, according to the screening criteria for the consistency of recommendation strength (consistency ≥ 70%) and expert opinions, a total of 26 recommendations were screened in the first round. In the second round when the remaining 4 recommendations were investigated, one recommendation reached the consistency of recommendation strength ≥ 70%. Eventually, 27 recommendations were formed.Conclusion:The Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults (2024) constructed using the Delphi method shows good scientific validity, authority, and reliability, providing methodological references for guideline development and research.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of the impaction of posterior wall on the prognosis following open reduction and internal fixation for fractures of acetabular posterior wall.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the data from the 83 patients with fracture of acetabular posterior wall who had been consecutively treated by open reduction and internal fixation at Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on involvement of posterior wall impaction. In the impaction group of 33 cases, there were 26 males and 7 females with an age of (47.4±11.6) years; in the non-impaction group of 50 cases, there were 43 males and 7 females with an age of (41.3±12.0) years. The quality of postoperative fracture reduction, the function of the affected hip at the last follow-up, and the complication rate during follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. Multifactorial binary logistic regression and age subgroups were used to analyze the effects of posterior wall impaction on functional outcomes.Results:The age, rate of associated injuries in other body parts, and rate of posterior wall comminution in the impaction group were significantly higher than those in the non-impaction group ( P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in other general data of patients between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (44.5±13.3) months after surgery. The rate of anatomical reduction in the non-impaction group (96.0%, 48/50) was significantly higher than that in the impaction group (57.6%, 19/33) ( P<0.05), and the good and excellent rate by the modified Merle d'Aubigné & Postel scale at the last follow-up in the non-impaction group (84.0%, 42/50) was significantly higher than that in the impaction group (51.5%, 17/33) ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). After adjusting for age and gender, the difference in hip function was still significantly different between the 2 groups ( OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.79, P=0.020). The effect of posterior wall impaction on functional outcomes was statistically significant in patients aged ≥50 years ( P=0.008), whereas the difference was not statistically significant in patients aged <50 years ( P=0.194). Conclusions:Compared with non-impaction ones, acetabular fractures of posterior wall impaction tend to lead to poorer quality of reduction, which in turn affects the postoperative recovery of hip joint function. The impact of impaction fractures on functional recovery is more significant in patients aged 50 years and above.

Objective:To compare the long-term clinical outcomes between cannulated screw internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures and arthroplasty for unstable ones in the elderly patients.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 542 patients with femoral neck fracture who had been admitted to Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from May 2015 to April 2017. The 542 patients were divided into 2 groups based on fracture stability and treatment method. In the stable group (Garden type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, and abduction compression type) of 121 cases who underwent cannulated screw internal fixation, there were 28 males and 93 females with a mean age of (77.6±8.1) years, and 20 cases of type Ⅰ, 101 cases of type Ⅱ, and 34 cases of abduction compression type by the Garden classification. In the unstable group (Garden type Ⅲ, type Ⅳ, and type Ⅱ with a posterior tilt angle >20°) of 421 cases who underwent arthroplasty, there were 130 males and 291 females with a mean age of (78.7 ± 6.9) years, and 14 cases of type Ⅱ, 403 cases of type Ⅲ, and 4 cases of type Ⅳ by the Garden classification. The postoperative mortality, reoperation rate, and mobility at the last follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics, except for serum albumin concentration and peripheral white blood cell count at admission, between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). The hospital stay in the stable group [5.0 (4.0, 6.0)d] was significantly shorter than that in the unstable group [6.0 (5.0, 8.0)d], and the follow-up time for the stable group [54.4 (49.3, 58.7) months] significantly longer than that for the unstable group [52.2 (46.0, 59.3) months] ( P<0.05). A total of 158 patients (45 cases in the stable group and 113 cases in the unstable group) were lost to the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, the mortality in the stable group (18.4%, 14/76) was significantly lower than that in the unstable group (31.5%, 97/308), the reoperation rate in the former (15.8%, 12/76) significantly higher than that in the latter (3.6%, 11/308), and the capability of daily activities in the former (by the fracture mobility scoring: level 1 in 35 cases, level 2 in 13 cases, level 3 in 3 cases, level 4 in 2 cases, and level 5 in 1 case) significantly better than that in the latter (level 1 in 99 cases, level 2 in 47 cases, level 3 in 24 cases, level 4 in 22 cases, and level 5 in 5 cases) (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with the arthroplasty for unstable femoral neck fractures, cannulated screw internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures leads to a lower long-term mortality and a better capability of daily activities, but a significantly higher reoperation rate.

Objective:To evaluate the emergency iliosacral screw fixation assisted by TiRobot for unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture.Methods:The 26 patients with unstable pelvic fracture were analyzed retrospectively who had undergone emergency iliosacral screw fixation at Department of Orthopedics & Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from June 2018 to December 2020. They were divided into 2 groups depending on whether orthopaedic TiRobot was used to assist screw insertion. In the observation group of 14 cases subjected to TiRobot-assisted insertion of iliosacral screws, there were 10 males and 4 females with an age of (45.9 ± 10.1) years; in the control group of 12 cases subjected to conventional manual insertion of iliosacral screws, there were 9 males and 3 females with an age of (49.2 ± 11.3) years. All the surgeries were conducted within 24 hours after injury. The 2 groups were compared in terms of screw insertion time, pin insertion, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, postoperative screw position, fracture reduction and Harris hip score at the final follow-up.Results:The 2 groups were comparable because there was no significant difference between them in their preoperative general clinical data or follow-up time ( P>0.05). The screw insertion time [(16.1 ± 3.4) min] and fluoroscopy time [(8.1 ± 3.3) s] in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(26.4 ± 5.4) min and (25.2 ± 7.4) s], and the pin insertions [1 (1, 2) times] and intraoperative blood loss [(10.5 ± 6.4) mL] in the former were significantly less than those in the latter [6 (3, 8) times and (24.8 ± 6.7) mL] (all P<0.05). Postoperatively, the sacroiliac screw position was excellent in 18 cases and good in 2 in the observation group while excellent in 14 cases, good in 2 and poor in 2 in the control group; the fracture reduction was excellent in 12 cases, good in one and fair in one in the observation group while excellent in 10 cases, good in one and fair in one in the control group, showing insignificant differences in the above comparisons ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference either in the Harris hip score at the final follow-up between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Compared with conventional manual insertion of iliosacral screws, emergency iliosacral screw fixation assisted by TiRobot can effectively decrease surgical time and reduce operative invasion due to a higher accuracy rate of screw insertion.