Central venous access device associated skin impairment is a common complication of indwelling central venous catheters in cancer patients. To further enhance the standardization of nursing staff's practice of central venous access device associated skin impairment, a clinical nursing practice guideline for central venous access device associated skin impairment in cancer patients was developed through the Delphi expert consultation and expert meeting methods in accordance with the methodology for developing evidence-based nursing practice guidelines. Recommendations cover four aspects of management requirements, assessment, prevention, and management of central venous access device associated skin impairment, providing a practical basis for clinical healthcare professionals to make scientific decisions on central venous access device associated skin impairment.

Central venous access device associated skin impairment is a common complication of indwelling central venous catheters in cancer patients. To further enhance the standardization of nursing staff's practice of central venous access device associated skin impairment, a clinical nursing practice guideline for central venous access device associated skin impairment in cancer patients was developed through the Delphi expert consultation and expert meeting methods in accordance with the methodology for developing evidence-based nursing practice guidelines. Recommendations cover four aspects of management requirements, assessment, prevention, and management of central venous access device associated skin impairment, providing a practical basis for clinical healthcare professionals to make scientific decisions on central venous access device associated skin impairment.

OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of the Ph⁺ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph⁻ ALL patients with allo-HSCT.

METHODSA total of 19 Ph⁺ALL patients were matched with 19 Ph⁻ALL patients from 55 B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT in our hospital between January 2003 and August 2014 and were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSGender, median age, number of patients with blood white count more than 30 × 10⁹/L, number of patients with meningeal leukemia, disease status before allo-HSCT, period of allo-HSCT, the source of stem cell from donors, HLA disparities between donor and recipient, conditioning regimens and number of infused mononuclear cells and CD34⁺ cells were comparable between two groups of Ph⁺ and 19 Ph⁻ALL patients. The median time of engraftment of neutrophil cells was 12 days versus 13 days (P= 0.284) and that of platelet 14 days versus 17 days (P=0.246), which were comparable between two groups. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ALL groups was (67.5 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P=0.434) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS)was (67.8 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P= 0.456), respectively. The cumulative incidence of degree Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ ALL group was (15.8±8.4)% versus (21.1 ± 9.4)% (P=0.665)and that of degree Ⅲ-Ⅳ aGVHD was (5.6 ± 5.4)% versus (11.5 ± 7.6)% (P=0.541), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was (44.1 ± 14.0)% in Ph⁺ALL group versus (44.1 ± 13.0)% in Ph⁻ALL group (P=0.835) and that of extensive cGVHD was (13.1 ± 8.7)% versus (6.2 ± 6.1)% (P=0.379), respectively. The cumulative relapse rate and the cumulative non-relapse rate in both group also have no statistical difference [(10.8 ± 7.2)% versus (20.0 ± 10.7)% (P=0.957) and (23.9 ± 12.4)% versus (7.1±6.9)% (P=0.224), respectively].

CONCLUSIONThe efficacy of Ph⁺ALL treated with combination of chemotherapy and TKIs and followed by allo-HSCT is comparable to that of Ph⁻ALL with allo-HSCT.

Disease-Free Survival ; Graft vs Host Disease ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Retrospective Studies