Objective To propose a method for abdominal multi-organ segmentation assisted by multi-phase CT synthesis.Methods Multi-phase CT synthesis for synthesizing high-quality CT images was used to increase the information details for image segmentation.A transformer block was introduced to help to capture long-range semantic information in cooperation with perceptual loss to minimize the differences between the real image and synthesized image.Results The model was trained using multi-phase CT dataset of 526 total cases from Nanfang Hospital.The mean maximum absolute error(MAE)of the synthesized non-contrast CT,venous phase contrast-enhanced CT(CECT),and delay phase CECT images from arterial phase CECT was 19.192±3.381,20.140±2.676 and 22.538±2.874,respectively,which were better than those of images synthesized using other methods.Validation of the multi-phase CT synthesis-assisted abdominal multi-organ segmentation method showed an average dice coefficient of 0.847 for the internal validation set and 0.823 for the external validation set.Conclusion The propose method is capable of synthesizing high-quality multi-phase CT images to effectively reduce the errors in registration between different phase CT images and improve the performance for segmentation of 13 abdominal organs.

Objective To propose a method for abdominal multi-organ segmentation assisted by multi-phase CT synthesis.Methods Multi-phase CT synthesis for synthesizing high-quality CT images was used to increase the information details for image segmentation.A transformer block was introduced to help to capture long-range semantic information in cooperation with perceptual loss to minimize the differences between the real image and synthesized image.Results The model was trained using multi-phase CT dataset of 526 total cases from Nanfang Hospital.The mean maximum absolute error(MAE)of the synthesized non-contrast CT,venous phase contrast-enhanced CT(CECT),and delay phase CECT images from arterial phase CECT was 19.192±3.381,20.140±2.676 and 22.538±2.874,respectively,which were better than those of images synthesized using other methods.Validation of the multi-phase CT synthesis-assisted abdominal multi-organ segmentation method showed an average dice coefficient of 0.847 for the internal validation set and 0.823 for the external validation set.Conclusion The propose method is capable of synthesizing high-quality multi-phase CT images to effectively reduce the errors in registration between different phase CT images and improve the performance for segmentation of 13 abdominal organs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation versus traditional open decompression and internal fixation for treatment of lumbar burst fractures. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 61 patients with single-segment lumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria and were admitted between October 2022 and December 2023. Of them, 25 patients received UBE technique assisted decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (UBE group), while 36 patients were treated with traditional posterior unilateral hemilaminectomy decompression and internal fixation (open group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, AO classification of lumbar fractures, and preoperative height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion, the classification of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grading were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation, at 1 week after operation, and at last follow-up. Lumbar anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were performed to measure the segmental kyphosis angle, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, and the rate of spinal canal invasion. RESULTS: Surgery was successfully completed in both groups. No complication such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury was found during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05), the UBE group revealed significant less intraoperative blood loss when compared with open group ( P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-20 months, with an average of 13 months. There was no loosening, breakage, or failure of internal fixation in all patients. The ASIA grading, VAS score, ODI of the two groups significantly improved at 1 week after operation and further improved at last follow-up ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ASIA grading at 1 week after operation and last follow-up between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the VAS score and ODI in the UBE group were significantly superior to the open group ( P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion significantly improved when compared to preoperative ones ( P<0.05), the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra and segmental kyphosis angle significantly decreased at last follow-up when compared to the values at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05), but the rate of spinal canal invasion was further significantly improved, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at different time point postoperatively. CONCLUSION UBE technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar burst fractures, which with little trauma and faster recovery when compared with traditional open decompression and internal fixation.
Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries* ; Spinal Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation* ; Endoscopy/methods* ; Decompression, Surgical/methods* ; Pedicle Screws ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of minimally invasive percutaneous internal fixation and traditional open reduction via Henry approach and internal fixation in the treatment of unstable distal radial fractures.

BACKGROUND:Photoelectric navigation-aided percutaneous pedicle screw placement has been developed extensively,but its accuracy,safety and effectiveness have not yet been confirmed by evidence-based medicine.OBJECTIVE:To compare the curative efficacy of photoelectric navigation-aided percutaneous pedicle screw placement and traditional open posterior pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.METHODS:Sixty patients with thoracolumbar fractures were equivalently randomized to treatment and control groups and then underwent photoelectric navigation-aided percutaneous pedicle screw placement and traditional open posterior pedicle screw fixation,respectively.The perioperative indexes,imaging indexes,function recovery and incidence of complications were compared between two groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) The Visual Analogue Scale scores,intraoperative blood loss,radiant times,and hospitalization time in the treatment group were significantly less than those in the control group (P ＜ 0.05).(2) The operation time did not differ significantly between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).(3) The postoperative sagittal Cobb angle,and percentage of anterior height in the vertebral body in the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P ＜ 0.05),but all above imaging indexes showed no significant differences between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The endplate-screw angle in the treatment group was significantly less than that in the control group (P ＜ 0.05).(5) The excellent and good rate of placement in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P ＜ 0.05).(6) These results suggest that compared with the traditional open posterior pedicle screw fixation,the photoelectric navigation-aided percutaneous pedicle screw placement exhibits high placement accuracy,less radiant times,less trauma,less blood loss and rapid functional recovery.