Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) is a common and lethal manifestation of advanced gastric cancer, with a median survival of only 5-11 months. This consensus was developed by 30 experts from Asia (China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore) using the Delphi method and the GRADE evidence grading system. A total of 29 statements were formulated, covering the diagnosis and assessment of GCPM, indications for laparoscopic exploration and NIPS (normothermic intraperitoneal and systemic treatment), treatment regimens, prevention and management of complications, criteria for conversion surgery, and postoperative intraperitoneal therapy. The consensus aims to standardize clinical practice and improve the prognosis of patients with GCPM.

Objective:To collect and analyze the quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province from 2020 to 2022,and study the role of publishing surgical quality control data in promoting the improvement of gastric cancer surgery of China. Methods:An online questionnaire was created and distributed to the members of Jiangsu Gastric Cancer Union(JSGCU).The questionnaire collected information including the basic situation of hospital,the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer,advanced gastric cancer and metastatic gastric cancer,the digestive tract reconstruction,the surgical safety,the economic indicators,and so on. Results:The quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province from 2020 to 2022 were consistently collected and published.The data analysis results show that there was a gradual increase in the percent of patients with stage Ⅰ gastric cancer,reflecting the success efforts of early screening and diagnosis.Laparoscopic surgery showed a steady increase and became the mainstream approach for curative surgery of gastric cancer in Jiangsu Province.The percent of hospital with lymph node dissection≥30 was also increased.Different locations of gastric cancer exhibited specific patterns in the choice of anastomosis methods after curative surgery.The rate of grade 3 or higher complications in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery was slightly lower than that in open surgery.For patients experiencing complications,their postoperative hospitalization duration and expenditure were significantly higher.Finally,there was a gradual increase in the proportion of hospital choosing to close the mesentery during gastric cancer surgery. Conclusion:The publication of the quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province has driven the improvement of gastric cancer surgery standards of China.

With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.

Digestive tract reconstruction for gastric cancer has gone through a century and gradually formed a mature and complete system. Reasonable digestive tract reconstruction is one of the key factors in minimizing functional disorders after gastrectomy and enhancing quality of life. Therefore, this article summarizes the history and current situation of digestive tract reconstruction both domestically and internationally, including distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and pylorus preserving gastrectomy, in order to seek the future development direction of digestive tract reconstruction and benefit gastric cancer patients.

Objective:To share the results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ- shaped modified double tract reconstruction.Method:This study retrospectively included 3 patients during January 2024 from the Department of Gastric Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University using the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The procedure of the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is as follows. After completing proximal gastrectomy, the jejunum is transected 15 cm from the Treitz ligament. A suture is made 18-20 cm from the distal jejunum to mark the esophagojejunal anastomosis site. A circular stapler anvil is inserted through the distal jejunum, and the remaining end of the jejunum is turned to the right. The circular stapler is pierced through the marked site for an esophagojejunal end-to-end anastomosis, which is reinforced with a barbed suture continuously. A 60mm linear stapler is used to close the remaining end of the jejunum. We then mark the gastric side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with suture in the middle of the anterior wall of the residual stomach, and mark the jejunal side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis at a distance of about 2 cm and 8 cm from the residual end of the distal jejunum. We make an opening of about 0.5 cm and use a 60 mm linear stapler to perform anastomosis on the jejunal side of the anterior wall of the residual stomach according to the markings, so that the distance between the esophagojejunal anastomosis and the gastrojejunal anastomosis is 10-12 cm. The common opening is closed with barbed wire. About 50 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the small intestine opening is anastomosed side to side using a circular stapler and the common opening is closed. Return the jejunum into the abdominal cavity to complete the reconstruction of the λ-shaped double tract reconstruction. We analyzed the surgery and postoperative conditions, including surgery time, anastomosis time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size and pathology, postoperative mobilization, passage of gas and water intake time, discharge time, postoperative complications, and postoperative gastrointestinal imaging to observe the passage of food through the gastric and intestinal loops.Results:Three patients successfully received laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The surgical time was 155 minutes, 240 minutes, and 160 minutes, respectively; The postoperative time for first ambulation was 20 hours, 18 hours, and 26 hours, respectively. The time for passage of gas was 59 hours, 83 hours, and 75 hours, respectively. The drinking time was 66 hours, 87 hours, and 90 hours, respectively. The postoperative discharge days were all 7 days. No surgical related complications occurred. On the 6th day and 3 months after surgery, gastrointestinal angiography was performed. The contrast agent passed smoothly through the jejunal loop and residual stomach jejunal loop, and both sides were unobstructed. No contrast agent was found to retrograde to the esophagojejunal anastomosis.Conclusion:Laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is safe and feasible, as it improves the diversion of food through the residual stomach while ensuring anti-reflux effects.

Objective:To investigate the prognosis and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal mesenchymal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to analyze the relationship between blood concentrations of this drug and prognosis.Methods:In this retrospective study, we investigated the effects of ripretinib in patients with advanced GISTs. The inclusion criteria comprised: (1) daily oral administration of ripretinib scheduled; and (2) uninterrupted treatment for at least 1month, with a stable and relatively fixed daily dosage maintained for a minimum of 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria comprised concurrent use of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors and presence of significant organ dysfunction. We retrospectively identified 79 patients with advanced GISTs who had received ripretinib across seven medical centers, namely Jiangsu Provincial Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, from 1 June 2021 to 31 March 2024. The cohort included 48 men and 31 women, 19 of whom had received ripretinib as second-line, 13 as third-line, and 47 as fourth-line therapy. Two peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from each participant and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry used to determine peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of ripretinib. Machine learning methodologies, specifically the K-nearest neighbor algorithm combined with the Gridsearch CV strategy, were employed to establish the threshold for Cmin. We analyzed adverse reactions, treatment efficacy, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the relationship between drug blood concentration and selected clinical parameters.Results:In the entire cohort, the Cmin and Cmax of ripretinib were 467 ± 360 μg/L and 986 ± 493 μg/L, respectively. Notably, female patients and individuals in the high-dose group exhibited significantly higher values for both Cmin and Cmax (both P<0.05). However, variations in drug concentrations associated with the line of ripretinib therapy, treatment efficacy, disease progression, and presence of selected specific genetic mutations were not significantly associated with values of Cmin and Cmax ( P>0.05). Among the 79 patients with advanced GISTs receiving ripretinib, reported adverse reactions included alopecia (53, 67.09%), hand–foot syndrome (24, 30.38%), fatigue (22, 27.85%), and myalgia (21, 26.58%). Two patients (2.53%) had grade III complications, both classified as hand–foot syndrome. The correlation between Cmax and adverse reactions was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). By the time of the latest follow-up, five deaths (6.3%) had occurred within the cohort. The mPFS for the group was 16.3 months, with a mPFS of 14.4 months for those receiving standard dosage and 7.0 months for those receiving escalating dosage. Among the 65 patients treated with standard doses of ripretinib, those with Cmin exceeding a threshold of 450 μg/L exhibited a significantly longer mPFS (18.0 months vs.13.7 months; P < 0.05). Conclusion:In China, patients with advanced GISTs exhibit a notable tolerance to ripretinib, with no evidence for a correlation between adverse reactions and Cmax for the drug. Additionally, a Cmin exceeding 450 μg/L may be associated with an extended mPFS.

With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.

Digestive tract reconstruction for gastric cancer has gone through a century and gradually formed a mature and complete system. Reasonable digestive tract reconstruction is one of the key factors in minimizing functional disorders after gastrectomy and enhancing quality of life. Therefore, this article summarizes the history and current situation of digestive tract reconstruction both domestically and internationally, including distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and pylorus preserving gastrectomy, in order to seek the future development direction of digestive tract reconstruction and benefit gastric cancer patients.

Objective:To share the results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ- shaped modified double tract reconstruction.Method:This study retrospectively included 3 patients during January 2024 from the Department of Gastric Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University using the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The procedure of the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is as follows. After completing proximal gastrectomy, the jejunum is transected 15 cm from the Treitz ligament. A suture is made 18-20 cm from the distal jejunum to mark the esophagojejunal anastomosis site. A circular stapler anvil is inserted through the distal jejunum, and the remaining end of the jejunum is turned to the right. The circular stapler is pierced through the marked site for an esophagojejunal end-to-end anastomosis, which is reinforced with a barbed suture continuously. A 60mm linear stapler is used to close the remaining end of the jejunum. We then mark the gastric side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with suture in the middle of the anterior wall of the residual stomach, and mark the jejunal side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis at a distance of about 2 cm and 8 cm from the residual end of the distal jejunum. We make an opening of about 0.5 cm and use a 60 mm linear stapler to perform anastomosis on the jejunal side of the anterior wall of the residual stomach according to the markings, so that the distance between the esophagojejunal anastomosis and the gastrojejunal anastomosis is 10-12 cm. The common opening is closed with barbed wire. About 50 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the small intestine opening is anastomosed side to side using a circular stapler and the common opening is closed. Return the jejunum into the abdominal cavity to complete the reconstruction of the λ-shaped double tract reconstruction. We analyzed the surgery and postoperative conditions, including surgery time, anastomosis time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size and pathology, postoperative mobilization, passage of gas and water intake time, discharge time, postoperative complications, and postoperative gastrointestinal imaging to observe the passage of food through the gastric and intestinal loops.Results:Three patients successfully received laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The surgical time was 155 minutes, 240 minutes, and 160 minutes, respectively; The postoperative time for first ambulation was 20 hours, 18 hours, and 26 hours, respectively. The time for passage of gas was 59 hours, 83 hours, and 75 hours, respectively. The drinking time was 66 hours, 87 hours, and 90 hours, respectively. The postoperative discharge days were all 7 days. No surgical related complications occurred. On the 6th day and 3 months after surgery, gastrointestinal angiography was performed. The contrast agent passed smoothly through the jejunal loop and residual stomach jejunal loop, and both sides were unobstructed. No contrast agent was found to retrograde to the esophagojejunal anastomosis.Conclusion:Laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is safe and feasible, as it improves the diversion of food through the residual stomach while ensuring anti-reflux effects.

Objective:To investigate the prognosis and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal mesenchymal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to analyze the relationship between blood concentrations of this drug and prognosis.Methods:In this retrospective study, we investigated the effects of ripretinib in patients with advanced GISTs. The inclusion criteria comprised: (1) daily oral administration of ripretinib scheduled; and (2) uninterrupted treatment for at least 1month, with a stable and relatively fixed daily dosage maintained for a minimum of 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria comprised concurrent use of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors and presence of significant organ dysfunction. We retrospectively identified 79 patients with advanced GISTs who had received ripretinib across seven medical centers, namely Jiangsu Provincial Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, from 1 June 2021 to 31 March 2024. The cohort included 48 men and 31 women, 19 of whom had received ripretinib as second-line, 13 as third-line, and 47 as fourth-line therapy. Two peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from each participant and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry used to determine peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of ripretinib. Machine learning methodologies, specifically the K-nearest neighbor algorithm combined with the Gridsearch CV strategy, were employed to establish the threshold for Cmin. We analyzed adverse reactions, treatment efficacy, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the relationship between drug blood concentration and selected clinical parameters.Results:In the entire cohort, the Cmin and Cmax of ripretinib were 467 ± 360 μg/L and 986 ± 493 μg/L, respectively. Notably, female patients and individuals in the high-dose group exhibited significantly higher values for both Cmin and Cmax (both P<0.05). However, variations in drug concentrations associated with the line of ripretinib therapy, treatment efficacy, disease progression, and presence of selected specific genetic mutations were not significantly associated with values of Cmin and Cmax ( P>0.05). Among the 79 patients with advanced GISTs receiving ripretinib, reported adverse reactions included alopecia (53, 67.09%), hand–foot syndrome (24, 30.38%), fatigue (22, 27.85%), and myalgia (21, 26.58%). Two patients (2.53%) had grade III complications, both classified as hand–foot syndrome. The correlation between Cmax and adverse reactions was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). By the time of the latest follow-up, five deaths (6.3%) had occurred within the cohort. The mPFS for the group was 16.3 months, with a mPFS of 14.4 months for those receiving standard dosage and 7.0 months for those receiving escalating dosage. Among the 65 patients treated with standard doses of ripretinib, those with Cmin exceeding a threshold of 450 μg/L exhibited a significantly longer mPFS (18.0 months vs.13.7 months; P < 0.05). Conclusion:In China, patients with advanced GISTs exhibit a notable tolerance to ripretinib, with no evidence for a correlation between adverse reactions and Cmax for the drug. Additionally, a Cmin exceeding 450 μg/L may be associated with an extended mPFS.