OBJECTIVE To assess the scientific rigor， clarity and feasibility of the recommendations of the Guidelines for Evidence-based Use of Biological Agents for the Clinical Treatment of Osteoporosis （hereinafter referred to as the Guideline） through external review， in order to further revise and improve the Guideline recommendations. METHODS This study employed a cross-sectional survey research design， a convenience sampling method was adopted to select frontline medical workers in the field of osteoporosis （including clinical doctors， clinical pharmacists， and nurses） as well as patients or their family members. External review was conducted through a combination of closed-ended and open-ended electronic questionnaires to get feedback from them on the appreciation，clarity and feasibility of the 32 preliminary recommendations in the Guideline. RESULTS A total of 90 external review subjects from 15 hospitals were collected， including 45 clinical doctors， 15 clinical pharmacists， 15 nurses and 15 patients or their family members. The overall appreciation degree of recommendations was 99.38%， the overall clarity degree of recommendations was 98.92%， and the overall feasibility degree of recommendations was 99.65%. At the same time， 111 subjective suggestions were collected， which provided an important reference for the further improvement of the Guideline recommendations. Based on the above feedback， the Guideline steering committee and core expert group revised the wording of 12 draft recommendations without deletion， and finally determined 32 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The external review provides an important basis for the final formation of the Guideline， further improves the scientific rigor， clarity and feasibility of the recommendations， and ensures the standardization， practicality and implementability of the Guideline.

OBJECTIVE To provide standardized guidance for the clinical application and management of biosimilars， and promote their widespread and rational use in clinical treatment. METHODS The design， planning， and drafting process as well as the full report of Evidence-based Guideline for the Management of Clinical Application of Biosimilars in China （2024 Edition） followed the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development （2nd edition）， which fully considered the best current evidence from evidence-based medicine， multidisciplinary expert experience， and patient preferences and values. Grading of Recommendations Assessment， Development， and Evaluation （GRADE） approach was adopted to evaluate the quality of evidence and determine the strength of recommendations. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based Guideline for the Management of Clinical Application of Biosimilars in China （2024 Edition） presented 10 recommendations including 7 strong recommendations and 3 weak recommendations. The recommendations covered the entire process of clinical application and management of biosimilars. Medical institutions and relevant health regulatory departments can refer to this guideline for the scientific management of the extrapolation of unapproved indications of biosimilars. Healthcare providers can refer to this guideline for pre-treatment assessments， patient education， pre-treatment regimen before administration， and dosage regimen adjustments. Multidisciplinary medical teams can refer to this guideline to provide pharmacovigilance and patient management throughout the treatment process.

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) refers to AI technology capable of generating new content such as text, images, or audio from training data. GAI tools not only demonstrate rapid and efficient potential in literature screening, data extraction, and literature appraisal in systematic reviews, but can also be used for guideline evaluation and dissemination, enhancing the readability and promotion efficiency of guidelines. However, the accuracy of content generated by GAI tools, the rationality of cited evidence, the level of evidence, and the reliability of data still need verification. Additionally, data privacy protection and ethical issues are challenges that need to be addressed. This article aims to overview the current status of GAI tools in the formulation, evaluation, dissemination, and implementation of guidelines, explore the feasibility and new models of GAI tools in the field of guidelines, and improve the efficiency and quality of guideline formulation to better serve guideline developers and users.

AIM:To systematically evaluate the clinical interchangeability of adalimumab biosimi-lars in terms of efficacy,safety,and immunogenici-ty,and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical interchangeability.METHODS:Randomized Controlled Trials(RCTs)on the interchangeability of adalimumab biosimilars were systematically searched in PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,WANFANG and SinoMed from inceptions to October 2023.Data were extracted from the litera-ture that met the inclusion criteria,risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for System-atic Reviews of Interventions 5.0 bias risk assess-ment tool.Meta-analysis was performed using Rev-man 5.4 software.The certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration.This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline.RESULTS:Eigh-teen studies were included,with 7 focusing on pso-riasis and 11 on rheumatoid arthritis.Regarding ef-ficacy,for psoriasis,there were no statistical differ-ences in PASI 75 response rates and sPGA scores of ≤1 after 1-4 switches between biosimilars and the reference drug(P＞0.05,moderate-quality evi-dence).For rheumatoid arthritis,there were no sta-tistical differences in ACR 20/50/70 response rates after 1-3 switches(P＞0.05,moderate-quality evi-dence).Regarding safety,there were no statistical differences in the risk of adverse events after single or multiple switches for both diseases(P＞0.05,moderate-quality evidence).Regarding immunoge-nicity,there were no statistical differences in the rate of anti-drug antibody production after single or multiple switches(P＞0.05,moderate-quality evi-dence).High-quality evidence is still lacking for the interchangeability of adalimumab biosimilars in other indications.CONCLUSION:The switches be-tween adalimumab biosimilars and the reference drug have no significant impact on clinical efficacy,safety and immunogenicity for psoriasis and rheu-matoid arthritis patients.

AIM:To evaluate and analyze the post-marketing adverse drug reaction(ADR)signals of polatuzumab vedotin,so as to provide reference for clinical safety management.METHODS:Using the FDA adverse drug event reporting system(FAERS)database and OpenVigil data platform,the ADR reports of polatuzumab vedotin were collect-ed from June 10,2019(FDA approval for market-ing)to the March 31,2023.The ADR signals were detected by using the reporting odds ratio(ROR)and proportional reporting ratio(PRR)in the pro-portional imbalance method.To increase the threshold and obtain stronger and more frequently occurring ADRs,a second screening of signals was performed.RESULTS:A total of 2 408 ADR reports related to polatuzumab vedotin were collected,and 83 ADR signals were detected after secondary screening.26 ADR signals were not mentioned in the drug instructions such as abnormal spinal mag-netic resonance imaging,increased bone resorp-tion,osteolysis,decreased aspartate aminotransfer-ase,decreased alanine aminotransferase,hypofibri-nogenemia,and pulmonary embolism.The system organ classes with a high signal counts or cumula-tive number of cases included infections and inva-sive diseases(24 signals,632 cases),various exami-nations(17 signals,675 cases),blood and lymphat-ic system diseases(11 signals,734 cases),various nervous system diseases(7 signals,153 cases),im-mune system diseases(3 signals,95 cases),system-ic diseases and various reactions at the site of ad-ministration(2 signals,145 cases),and systemic dis-eases and various reactions at the site of adminis-tration(2 signals,87 cases),etc.CONCLUSION:In addition to the common ADRs suggested by the in-structions,this study identified new ADR risk sig-nals for polatuzumab vedotin.In the clinical appli-cation of polatuzumab vedotin,in addition to the ADR mentioned in the instructions such as infec-tions,myelosuppression,peripheral neuropathies,infusion-related reactions,and abnormal liver func-tion,attention should also be paid to the risk sig-nals not mentioned such as abnormal spinal mag-netic resonance imaging,and increased bone re-sorption.

Evidence-based Practice Guideline of Medication Therapy of High-dose Methotrexate in China was published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology in February 2022. The guideline followed the latest definition of clinical practice guideline and the methodology specification for the guideline development of WHO. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment ， Development，and Evaluation （GRADE）approach was applied to rate the quality of evidence and determine the strength of recommendations. Finally ，this guideline presents 28 recommendations covering the whole process of clinical medication of high-dose methotrexate ，involving evaluation prior to administration （liver and renal function ，pleural effusion and ascites ， comedication，genetic testing ），pre-treatment and routine dosing regimen （pretreatment of hydration and alkalization ，urine alkalization，routine dosing regimen ），therapeutic drug monitoring （necessity，method，timing，target concentration ），leucovorin rescue（rescue timing ，rescue regimen ，rescue dose optimization ），and management of toxicities （liver and kidney function monitoring，supportive treatment ，blood purification treatment ）. This article aims to summarize and interpret the recommendations of this guideline ，so as to promote the better promotion and implementation of this guideline and provide comprehensive technical support and suggestions for whole-course individualized administration of high-dose methotrexate in China.

OBJECTIVE：To provid e reference for pharmaceutical workers to better understand Novel Coronavirus Infection ： Expert Consensus on Guidance and Prevention Strategies for Hospital Pharmacists and the Pharmacy Workforce （hereinafter referred to as “expert consensus ”），and to apply and practice in specific work ，so as to give full play to the role of pharmacists to help fight the epidemic.METHODS ：The background of the formulation and revision of the expert consensus were introduced ，and its main contents and viewpoints were interpreted. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS ：The text of expert consensus is divided into 8 parts，mainly including disease diagnosis and treatment [SARS-CoV- 2 infection related background ，clinical manifestations and diagnosis， treatment]，hospital pharmacy （prevention and control strategy ，work guidance ），drug and facility support management（key drug/facility/equipment support ，management and use of the drug in special circumstances ），information sources and related resources ，etc.，which comprehensively and detailedly provide information ，guidance and strategies for coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and control to play the role of pharmacists in hospital pharmacy well ，do well in the protection of staff in different pharmaceutical posts ，drug security work in response to epidemic situation ，and develop pharmaceutical care. So far，the understanding of SARS-CoV- 2 in the pharmaceutical industry is relatively limited. Based on the accumulated experience and progress in epidemic prevention and control ，the expert consensus will be updated and improved continuously ，so as to provide guidance and help for hospital pharmaceutical personnel.

OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the c orrelation of methylenetetra hydrofolate reductase （MTHFR）C677T and A 1298C gene polymorphisms with blood system adverse events induced by high-dose of methotrexate （HDMTX）. METHODS ： Retrieved from Medline ，Embase，Clinical Trials.gov ，CNKI，Wanfang database ，CBM，cohort studies about MTHFR gene polymorphism in hematological neoplasm treated by HDMTX were collected from inceptions to March 2018. After data extraction of included literatures ，quality evaluation with Newcastle Ottawa scale ，Meta-analysis was performed for adverse events of blood system induced by HDMTX in different genetic models with Rev Man 5.3 software. RESULTS ：Totally 25 cohort studies were included，23 studies of which were related to MTHFR C677T site （including 1 858 patients）and 16 studies related to MTHFR A1298C site （including 1 088 patients）. Results of Meta-analysis showed that MTHFR C677T mutation type significantly increased the risk of hematotoxicity [TT/CT vs. CC ：OR＝1.57，95％CI（1.12，2.20），P＝0.009；TT vs. CT/CC ：OR＝2.19，95％CI（1.49， 3.23），P＜0.001；T vs. C ：OR＝1.34，95％CI（1.03，1.74）， P＝0.03] and severe hematotoxicity [TT/CT vs. CC ：OR＝m 2.33，95％CI（1.43，3.81），P＜0.001]，including leukopenia [TT/CT vs. CC ：OR＝1.37，95％CI（1.02，1.82），P＝0.03]， severe leukopenia [TT/CT vs. CC ：OR＝1.63，95％CI（1.03， 010-82265810。E-mail：zhao_rongsheng@163.com 2.56），P＝0.04]，severe gra nulopenia [TT/CT vs. CC ：OR＝ ·2.26，95％CI（1.50，3.39），P＜0.001]. The mutation genotypes of MTHFR A1298C significantly decreased the risk of severe hematotoxicity [CC/AC vs. AA ：OR＝0.17，95％CI（0.04，0.76），P＝0.02]，including leukopenia [CC/AC vs. AA ：OR＝0.68， 95％CI（0.48，0.97），P＝0.03；CC vs. AC/AA ：OR＝0.28，95％CI（0.14，0.59），P＜0.001] and severe leukopenia [CC/AC vs. AA：OR＝0.43，95％CI（0.19，0.97），P＝0.04]. CONCLUSIONS ：Among patients with hematological neoplasms ，MTHFR C677T mutation may significantly increase the risk of hematotoxicity by HDMTX including the risk of leukopenia and granulopenia ；while MTHFR A1298C may reduce the risk of hematotoxicity by HDMTX ，including the risk of leukopenia.

OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the effects of MTHFR， RFC1 and MDR1 gene polymorphisms on high- dose methotrexate-induced ADR in osteosarcoma patients， and to provide evidence-based reference for individual medication of high-dose of methotrexate. METHODS： Retrieved from Medline， Embase， clinical trials.gov， CNKI， Wanfang database and CBM， cohort studies about the association of MTHFR C677T/A1298C， RFC1 G80A， MDR1 C3435T gene polymorphisms with high-dose methotrexate-induced ADR were collected. After data extraction of clinical studies met inclusion criteria， and quality evaluation with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale， Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis were performed for outcome indexes as the incidence of high-dose methotrexate-induced ADR （hematotoxicity and myelosuppression， hepatotoxicity， nephrotoxicity， oral mucositis， digestive tract toxicity and overall adverse events） with Rev Man 5.3 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software. RESULTS： Totally 8 cohort studies involving 608 patients were included； 6， 5， 4 and 2 studies reported outcome indexes related to MTHFR C677T/A1298C， RFC1 G80A and MDR1 C3435T gene polymorphisms respectively. Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis showed that MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of G3-4 renal toxicity [TT/CT vs. CC： OR＝12.35， 95％CI＝（3.28，46.42）， P＜0.001]， G3-4 oral mucositis [T vs. C： OR＝2.04， 95％CI＝（1.06，3.93）， P＝0.03]， oral mucositis [（TT vs. CT/CC： OR＝2.27， 95％CI＝（1.20，4.27）， P＝0.01] and renal toxicity （P＜0.05）； MTHFR A1298C gene polymorphism was associated with G3-4 hepatotoxicity， G3-4 nephrotoxicity and G3-4 oral mucositis， without statistical significance （P＞0.05）. There was no significant correlation between RFC1 G80A polymorphism and hemotoxicity， hepatotoxicity， nephrotoxicity and digestive tract toxicity （P＞0.05）. MDR1 C3435T polymorphism was significantly correlated with oral mucositis （P＜0.05）， but not with hematotoxicity and hepatotoxicity （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS： MTHFR C677T mutation can increase the risk of high-dose methotrexate-induced ADR. There is no significant association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and high-dose methotrexate-induced ADR. There are few studies on RFC1 G80A or MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and high-dose methotrexate-induced ADR， and their association is unclear.

OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety for different infusion schemes of large-dose （＞500 mg/m2） of methotrexate in the treatment of osteosarcoma， and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS： Retrieved from Medline， Embase， clinicaltrials.gov， CJFD， Wanfang database and CBM database， observational studies and randomized/non-randomized controlled trials about therapeutic efficacy and safety for different infusion schemes （different doses and infusion time） of large-dose of methotrexate in the treatment of osteosarcoma were included during the establishment of the database to Mar. 2018. After data extraction and quality evaluation with methodological evaluation index of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale， Cochrane 5.1.0 bias risk evaluation tool and non-randomized controlled trials， Meta-analysis or descriptive analysis for blood drug concentration （c）， related toxicity （e.g. incidence of hepatotoxicity， incidence of hemotoxicity） were performed by using Rev Man 5.3 software. RESULTS： Totally 5 studies were included， involving 310 cases. Results of Meta-analyses indicated c0 h [MD＝－240.11， 95％CI（－271.47， －208.75）， P＜0.001]， c24 h [MD＝－0.09， 95％CI （－0.11， 0.08）， P＜0.001]， c48 h [MD＝－0.07， 95％CI （－0.10， －0.05）， P＜0.001]， c72 h [MD＝－0.05， 95％CI （－0.06， －0.03）， P＜0.001] and the incidence of liver toxicity [OR＝0.26， 95％CI （0.10， 0.67）， P＜0.005] in 8 g/m2 group were significantly lower than 10 g/m2 group. Results of descriptive analysis showed that when both groups were given 8 g/m2， c24 h of patients with 2 and 4 h infusion time was significantly lower than that of patients with 6 h infusion time. The incidence of leukopenia and thrombo- cytopenia in 8 g/m2 group was significantly lower than 10 g/m2 group. CONCLUSIONS： In the treatment of osteosarcoma with high-dose of methotrexate， appropriate dosage reduction （e.g. 8 g/m2） and appropriate prolongation of infusion time   （e.g. 6 h） may lead to a better efficacy and safety.