Objective To track and evaluate the implementation and application of the occupational health standard Radiation shielding requirements for radiotherapy room—Part 4: Radiotherapy room of ²⁵²Cf neutron afterloading (GBZ/T 201.4-2015) by radiation health technical service agencies, medical institutions, health supervision agencies, and radiotherapy facility design units, and to provide a scientific basis for the further revision and implementation of this standard. Methods Following the Guideline for health standards tracking evaluation (WS/T 536-2017) and the project implementation plan, relevant practitioners were randomly selected for a questionnaire survey. The survey primarily focused on their awareness, standard training, application, and revision suggestions of GBZ/T 201.4-2015. The results were summarized and analyzed. Results A total of 168 evaluation questionnaires were collected from relevant practitioners in 28 provinces. Only 31.6% of the respondents reported being “well familiar” or “ familiar” with the standard, 27.4% of the respondents believed that the standard was widely used, and 45.2% of the respondents believed that the standard could meet the needs of their work. Only 14.9% of the respondents had received relevant training on the standard, more than half of the respondents had not applied the standard within the past 10 years, and 45.2% of the respondents believed that the standard "needs to be revised". Conclusion Due to the small number of californium-252 neutron afterloading radiotherapy devices in operation on the market, the overall awareness of the standard is low, suggesting that relevant authorities need to strengthen training and publicity of the standard, and that certain sections of the standard need to be revised or merged.

Objective To explore the factors predicting the reliability of platelet-impedance(PLT-I)re-sults through a retrospective analysis of non-aggregated samples with abnormal platelet histograms.Methods A total of 322 samples with abnormal platelet histograms were collected from the Sysmex XN9000 automatic hematology analyzer,all of which showed no platelet aggregation as determined by the DI-60 auto-matic digital image analysis system.Using the platelet count fluorescent(PLT-F)results as a standard,the absolute and relative deviations of PLT-I results were calculated,and the parameters of samples with devia-tions within and outside the allowable range were analyzed.Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential factors associated with deviations of PLT-I from PLT-F beyond the allowable range.The receiver op-erating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of these potential factors for devi-ations beyond the allowable range.Results The deviations of PLT-I from PLT-F were within the allowable range in 279 cases(86.65％)and outside the allowable range in 43 cases(13.35％).Comparisons between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in mean red blood cell valume(MCV),red blood cell distribution width-cuefficient of variation(RDW-SD),DI-60 red cell fragments,platelet distribution width(PDW),and DI-60 large platelet ratio(P＜0.05).Logistic regression indicated that DI-60 red cell fragments and DI-60 large platelet ratio were independent potential factors for deviations of PLT-I from PLT-F beyond the allowable range(P＜0.05).The cut off values for predicting deviations beyond the allowable range were 1.75 for DI-60 red cell fragments and 66％for DI-60 large platelet ratio.The area under the curve(AUC)for the combined diagnosis of the two factors was 0.813,with a sensitivity of 88.4％and a specificity of 66.3％,indicating a higher predictive value than individual factors(P＜0.05).Conclusion When platelet histograms are abnormal,DI-60 large platelet ratio and DI-60 red cell fragments are independent potential factors predic-ting the reliability of PLT-I results,and their combination has a high predictive value.

Non-specific low back pain is a major cause of productivity decline and disability worldwide.Its pathogenesis remains unclear,lacking significant organic lesions and imaging features.When the disease course persists for more than three months,it is referred to as chronic non-specific low back pain.Currently,rehabilita-tion for chronic non-specific low back pain often focuses on a single biomedical model and lacks multi-perspective analysis of its therapeutic mechanism.For such a complex condition with high prevalence and high recurrence rate,a multidimensional analysis of the mechanism of action and application of rehabilitation methods may contribute to more precise treatment.core training is an important method for the rehabilitation of chronic non-specific low back pain.This article reviews the mechanism of action of core training in treating chronic non-specific low back pain from the perspectives of biomechanics,neuromodulation,and psychological adaptation,and explores its combined application with emerging technologies such as virtual reality,thereby potentially improving treatment compliance and efficacy,aiming to provide insights for chronic non-specific low back pain precision rehabilitation and to facilitate the transition toward a multifactorial,multidisciplinary integrated model.

In December 2024, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) released the 2024 edition of EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carci-noma (HCC). Compared to the 2018 edition, the 2024 edition includes significant updates in several areas, such as personalized surveillance strategies based on individual risk assessment, standardiza-tion of liver imaging protocols and diagnostic criteria, the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches in complex cases, an updated approach to liver transplantation integration, transitions between surgery, locoregional, and systemic therapies, as well as the positioning of radiotherapy and the use of combination immunotherapy at various stages of the disease. The authors systematically interpret the main updates related to treatment strategies in the new guidelines, aiming to provide clinicians with clear decision-making references for treatment.

Non-specific low back pain is a major cause of productivity decline and disability worldwide.Its pathogenesis remains unclear,lacking significant organic lesions and imaging features.When the disease course persists for more than three months,it is referred to as chronic non-specific low back pain.Currently,rehabilita-tion for chronic non-specific low back pain often focuses on a single biomedical model and lacks multi-perspective analysis of its therapeutic mechanism.For such a complex condition with high prevalence and high recurrence rate,a multidimensional analysis of the mechanism of action and application of rehabilitation methods may contribute to more precise treatment.core training is an important method for the rehabilitation of chronic non-specific low back pain.This article reviews the mechanism of action of core training in treating chronic non-specific low back pain from the perspectives of biomechanics,neuromodulation,and psychological adaptation,and explores its combined application with emerging technologies such as virtual reality,thereby potentially improving treatment compliance and efficacy,aiming to provide insights for chronic non-specific low back pain precision rehabilitation and to facilitate the transition toward a multifactorial,multidisciplinary integrated model.

In December 2024, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) released the 2024 edition of EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carci-noma (HCC). Compared to the 2018 edition, the 2024 edition includes significant updates in several areas, such as personalized surveillance strategies based on individual risk assessment, standardiza-tion of liver imaging protocols and diagnostic criteria, the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches in complex cases, an updated approach to liver transplantation integration, transitions between surgery, locoregional, and systemic therapies, as well as the positioning of radiotherapy and the use of combination immunotherapy at various stages of the disease. The authors systematically interpret the main updates related to treatment strategies in the new guidelines, aiming to provide clinicians with clear decision-making references for treatment.