The role of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) without arthroscopic capsular release in patients with preoperative stiffness undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains unclear. Additionally, the association between shoulder stiffness and tendon healing after ARCR is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and retear rates between patients with preoperative stiffness treated by MUA alone and those without stiffness. Methods: This retrospective study included 322 patients who underwent ARCR for full-thickness tears between January 2012 and May 2022 with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes—including passive range of motion (ROM); the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score—were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into the stiffness group (MUA completed) and the non-stiffness group. Retears were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively, and retear rates were analyzed by tear size (medium vs. large/massive). Results: Eighty-eight patients with stiffness and 234 without stiffness met the study inclusion criteria. Preoperative ROM, JOA, and UCLA scores were significantly lower in the stiffness group. Both groups showed significant improvements at final follow-up, with greater gains in the stiffness group. Final outcomes were comparable, except for external rotation. In medium-sized tears, the retear rate was significantly lower in the stiffness group (1.9%) than in the non-stiffness group (10.8%) (P=0.042). No significant difference was observed for large/massive tears. Conclusions: Patients with preoperative stiffness treated with MUA alone achieved comparable outcomes to those without stiffness, with improved tendon healing in medium-sized tears. Level of evidence: III

BACKGROUND: Despite the huge burden of domestic work on women in Japan, its effects on their health have been poorly investigated. We aimed to assess the association between domestic work stress and self-rated psychological health among women. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using an online social research panel in February 2018. Participants were 2,000 women with paid work (the "workers" group) and 1,000 women without paid work (the "homemakers" group), aged between 25 and 59 years old and living with a partner. Self-rated psychological health (Mental Health and Vitality scales of the Japanese SF-36), occupational and domestic work stress (the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire), the 10-item Work-Family Conflict Scale, and sociodemographic factors were assessed. RESULTS: The workers had lower domestic job control and higher support from a partner and their parents than the homemakers (p < 0.001), whereas domestic job demand and psychological health were similar between the groups. After adjustment for the covariates using multiple linear regression models, better psychological health was significantly associated with lower domestic job demand, higher domestic job control, and having a young child in both groups. In addition, work-family conflicts and occupational job stress among the workers and caregiving among the homemakers showed negative associations with psychological health. CONCLUSION Self-rated psychological health in women was associated with domestic work stress regardless of employment status. To promote women's health, we need to take into account the effects of domestic work, work-family conflicts, and social support from families, as well as occupational factors.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter analysis of two groups of patients surgically treated for degenerative L4 unstable spondylolisthesis. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterolateral fusion (PLF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for degenerative L4 unstable spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is widely performed. However, few reports have compared the outcome of PLF to that of PLIF for degenerative L4 unstable spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Patients with L4 unstable spondylolisthesis with Meyerding grade II or more, slip of >10degrees or >4 mm upon maximum flexion and extension bending, and posterior opening of >5 degree upon flexion bending were studied. Patients were treated from January 2008 to January 2010. Patients who underwent PLF (n=12) and PLIF (n=19) were followed-up for >2 years. Radiographic findings and clinical outcomes evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were compared between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation included slip angle, translation, slip angle and translation during maximum flexion and extension bending, intervertebral disc height, lumbar lordotic angle, and fusion rate. RESULTS: JOA scores of the PLF group before surgery and at final follow-up were 12.3+/-4.8 and 24.1+/-3.7, respectively; those of the PLIF group were 14.7+/-4.8 and 24.2+/-7.8, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. Correction of slip estimated from postoperative slip angle, translation, and maintenance of intervertebral disc height in the PLIF group was significantly (p<0.05) better than those in the PLF group. However, there was no significant difference in lumbar lordotic angle, slip angle and translation angle upon maximum flexion, or extension bending. Fusion rates of the PLIF and PLF groups had no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The L4-L5 level posterior instrumented fusion for unstable spondylolisthesis using both PLF and PLIF could ameliorate clinical symptoms when local stability is achieved.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; Spondylolisthesis*

The aim of this study is to collect the suggestions and recommendations of health care professionals involved in the regional palliative care program (OPTIM-study). A total of 101 multidisciplinary health care professionals who participated in the intervention program were interviewed, and 107 meaningful units were obtained from 89 valid interviews. The responses were categorized into “suggestions regardless of profession” (n=59), including “Participate in a multi-disciplinary conference to expand the network of people”, “Try to understand the situation of others”, “Seek support from others when you cannot solve the problem by yourself”, “Pursue all possibilities before giving up”, and “Do not try too hard”. As suggestions to those engaged in each profession, “Suggestions to community pharmacies” and “Suggestions to care managers” are frequently described. An examination of suggestions by the participants in the regional palliative care program could provide some insights to improve community palliative care.

The aim of the present study was to examine the current use of a palliative care manual, brochures for patients, and assessment tools designed for the regional intervention study. A questionnaire survey (706 physicians and 2,236 nurses) and interviews (80 health care professionals) were conducted. The tools health care professionals most frequently used were the manual and brochures for families of imminently dying patients. Health care professionals experienced [shared understanding as a region level despite the clinical experience and specialty] and [increased confidence in palliative care they had practiced without clear evidence]. The manual were positively evaluated because they “cover all necessary information”, “come in an easy-to-carry-around size”, and “provide specific and practical advice”. Health care professionals valued the brochures for families of imminently dying patients, because illustrations were very helpful as oral explanation was difficult. This study suggests that the manual and brochures for families of imminently dying patients could serve to improve region-based palliative care.

The primary aim of this study was to compare the ratios of specialized palliative care use to all cancer death using 2 methods: 1) total number of patients who received either of specialized palliative care services (unadjusted), and 2) number of patients after adjustment of potentially duplicated counts (adjusted). The research team obtained patient list from all specialized palliative care services, and counted the number of the patients who received any specialized palliative care services. The ratio of adjusted value to unadjusted value was 0.59, and had large region differences.Unadjusted values had, although overestimated, essentially similar trends in changes by year and differences in the regions. In conclusion, total number of patients who received either of specialized palliative care services could be simple and feasible indicator to roughly determine the activity of specialized palliative care services, but exact number of the patients who received specialized palliative care services should be determined on the basis of the patient lists without duplicated counts.

The primary aim of this study was to describe how patient-held-records was used in the regional palliative care program (OPTIM-study). The number of patient-held-records disseminated was 1,131 per region per year. A total of 15% and 16% of 706 physicians and 2,236 nurses in the region reported that they used patient-held-records disseminated during the study periods, respectively. In-depth interview identified themes [difficulty in dissemination], potential benefits of patient-held-records ([improved sense-of-control of patients], [improved information sharing among health care professionals]), and barriers ([lack of patient-perceived benefits and patient burden], [necessity that all health care professionals involved should be aware the value of patient-held-records and understand how to use it]). Of 11 hospitals who introduced patient-held-records, only 2 hospitals continued to use it during 3-year study periods. In conclusion, region-wide dissemination of patient-held-records seems to be unfeasible in many regions in Japan.

The purpose of this study was to identify the greatest impact of the regional palliative care program on community health care professionals. Interviews were conducted involving 101 people who became involved in the intervention program implemented in 4 areas across Japan, and 96 valid responses were collected. The following were cited as the greatest impact: [I developed a network of people, and realized the importance of collaboration] (n＝61; “I was able to develop an interpersonal relationship” and “Now I understand the significance of collaboration”), [My knowledge and skills regarding palliative care were improved] (n＝18; “Knowledge and support helped me respond to patients with confidence” and “I have come to think that there is more to palliative care than terminal care”), [I rediscovered my role through a wide variety of experiences] (n＝10), [Both collaboration and palliative knowledge/skills meant a lot to me] (n＝4), [What I experienced in this program will help me play my role] (n＝2), and [Patients and their families became satisfied] (n＝1). The community palliative care program was most effective in facilitating collaboration, and helped participants develop knowledge and skills concerning palliative care.

The primary aim of this study was to collect the views of physicians and nurses in the regions where community-based palliative care intervention trial, the OPTIM-study, was performed. A content analysis of free comments of the questionnaire survey was conducted. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,763 physicians and 3,156 nurses after the intervention, and 706 and 2,236 responses were obtained, respectively. A content analysis identified 327 free comments from physicians and 737 from nurses. As favorable effects, the categories [Multidisciplinary teams and community networks were established] [Home-based care is widespread] [Medical knowledge and skills are acquired just as those involved in palliative care] emerged. The main effects of the community palliative care program included the establishment of multidisciplinary teams and community networks, development of home-based care, and increasing knowledge, skills, and awareness about palliative care.

It is important to collect patients' and their families' opinions to provide good palliative care. This study aims to analyze the contents of free description provided by the survey for cancer patients and bereaved families, which was performed before the intervention of The Outreach Palliative Care Trial of Integrated Regional Model (OPTIM) study. Requests for and good points of cancer treatment and palliative care were collected and classified. 1,493 advanced cancer patients and 1,658 bereaved families in four areas received the questionnaire, and 271 patients and 550 families filled in the free description. Cancer patients and bereaved families had demands for improved communication with medical staff, improved quality of pain relief, financial support of treatment, more educational activities on palliative care, and improved cooperation within and outside hospitals. Palliat Care Res 2011; 6(2): 237-245