The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China clearly stipulates that if a natural person has not expressed their disagreement to donation during their lifetime， the spouses， adult children， and parents may jointly make a written decision to donate the deceased’s body and organs. This provision has further sparked the discussion on “whether the ineligible close relatives have the right or should have the right to donate the body and organs under the premise that the spouses， adult children， and parents of the deceased are absent or have lost their civil capacity.” This paper argued that it was illegitimate for ineligible close relatives to donate the deceased’s body and organs. From the perspective of the basis for rights， close relatives obtained the ownership of the body and organs due to their identity relationship with the deceased. However， given that the donation differed from burial and other disposal forms， further restrictions needed to be imposed. The Civil Code excludes ineligible close relatives from legally qualified subjects through “specific identity，” thereby depriving them of the legal basis to donate the deceased’s body and organs. In terms of harmful consequences， on the one hand， donation by ineligible close relatives may fail to ensure respect for the deceased’s right to self-determination. On the other hand， it was difficult to distinguish whether their motivation for organ donation was from “goodness” or “profit”. If the intention to donate was driven by profit， then the act of donation would be tantamount to organ trafficking， which is highly harmful. Even under the special premise that the legally qualified subjects were absent or had lost their full civil capacity， the right to donate body and organs could not be obtained and exercised by ineligible close relatives， as it is enjoyed based on a specific identity relationship and has personal exclusivity. Therefore， it is illegitimate for ineligible close relatives to donate the deceased’s body and organs.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy in perimenopausal women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and its effects on bladder function and urodynamic status.Methods:A total of 137 perimenopausal women with PFD treated at Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine between February 2022 and May 2024 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into a control group ( n=68) and a study group ( n=69) by random number table method. Both groups received Kegel exercises. The control group additionally received pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy. The study group received combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy. The outcomes compared between groups were as follows: Bladder Function: First urge voiding volume (FVS), maximum urge voiding volume (MVS), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), prolapse of pelvic floor organs, urodynamics: Pressure of urethral maximum measurement (PUM), maximum urethral closure pressure (PMUC), bladder compliance (BC), pelvic floor muscle function: Pelvic floor muscle strength grade (PFMT), pelvic floor resting pressure (RP), vaginal dynamic pressure (VDPT). Normally distributed continuous data were presented as xˉ± s and compared by independent samples t-test. Categorical data were presented as case (%) and compared by χ2 test. Ranked data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis H test. A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups ( P>0.05). At post-treatment, the study group had a significantly higher clinical effective rate of 97.10% (67/69) compared to the control group, which was 88.24% (60/68) ( χ2=3.98, P=0.046). At post-treatment, the study group had significantly higher FVS [(238.29±10.22) mL vs. (229.37±10.54) mL, t=5.03, P<0.001] and MVS [(436.57±12.48) mL vs. (428.23±12.75) mL, t=3.87, P<0.001], and significantly lower PVR [(5.14±1.28) mL vs. (6.96±1.21) mL, t=8.55, P<0.001] compared to the control group. At post-treatment, urodynamic parameters were significantly higher in the study group: PUM [(10.08±0.97) kPa vs. (8.54±0.73) kPa, t=10.49, P<0.001], PMUC [(8.71±0.75) kPa vs. (7.68±0.64) kPa, t=8.64, P<0.001], and BC [(396.58±30.49) mL/kPa vs. (378.86±32.91) mL/kPa, t=3.27, P<0.001]. For pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q), the distribution were as follows: Study Group: Grade 0: 16, Grade Ⅰ: 34, Grade Ⅱ: 18, Grade Ⅲ: 1, Grade Ⅳ: 0, control Group: Grade 0: 9, Grade Ⅰ: 31, Grade Ⅱ: 23, Grade Ⅲ:5, Grade Ⅳ: 0. The difference was statistically significant ( Z=2.08, P=0.037). At post-treatment, pelvic floor muscle function was significantly higher in the study group: PFMT [(4.21±0.29) vs. (3.84±0.23), t=8.27, P<0.001], RP [(9.59±1.26) cmH?O vs. (8.34±1.17) cmH?O, t=6.02, P<0.001], and VDPT [(82.74±3.36) cmH?O vs. (77.45±3.52) cmH?O, t=9.00, P<0.001]. Conclusion:Combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy demonstrates significant efficacy in treating PFD in perimenopausal women. It markedly improves bladder function and urodynamic status.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy in perimenopausal women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and its effects on bladder function and urodynamic status.Methods:A total of 137 perimenopausal women with PFD treated at Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine between February 2022 and May 2024 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into a control group ( n=68) and a study group ( n=69) by random number table method. Both groups received Kegel exercises. The control group additionally received pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy. The study group received combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy. The outcomes compared between groups were as follows: Bladder Function: First urge voiding volume (FVS), maximum urge voiding volume (MVS), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), prolapse of pelvic floor organs, urodynamics: Pressure of urethral maximum measurement (PUM), maximum urethral closure pressure (PMUC), bladder compliance (BC), pelvic floor muscle function: Pelvic floor muscle strength grade (PFMT), pelvic floor resting pressure (RP), vaginal dynamic pressure (VDPT). Normally distributed continuous data were presented as xˉ± s and compared by independent samples t-test. Categorical data were presented as case (%) and compared by χ2 test. Ranked data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis H test. A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups ( P>0.05). At post-treatment, the study group had a significantly higher clinical effective rate of 97.10% (67/69) compared to the control group, which was 88.24% (60/68) ( χ2=3.98, P=0.046). At post-treatment, the study group had significantly higher FVS [(238.29±10.22) mL vs. (229.37±10.54) mL, t=5.03, P<0.001] and MVS [(436.57±12.48) mL vs. (428.23±12.75) mL, t=3.87, P<0.001], and significantly lower PVR [(5.14±1.28) mL vs. (6.96±1.21) mL, t=8.55, P<0.001] compared to the control group. At post-treatment, urodynamic parameters were significantly higher in the study group: PUM [(10.08±0.97) kPa vs. (8.54±0.73) kPa, t=10.49, P<0.001], PMUC [(8.71±0.75) kPa vs. (7.68±0.64) kPa, t=8.64, P<0.001], and BC [(396.58±30.49) mL/kPa vs. (378.86±32.91) mL/kPa, t=3.27, P<0.001]. For pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q), the distribution were as follows: Study Group: Grade 0: 16, Grade Ⅰ: 34, Grade Ⅱ: 18, Grade Ⅲ: 1, Grade Ⅳ: 0, control Group: Grade 0: 9, Grade Ⅰ: 31, Grade Ⅱ: 23, Grade Ⅲ:5, Grade Ⅳ: 0. The difference was statistically significant ( Z=2.08, P=0.037). At post-treatment, pelvic floor muscle function was significantly higher in the study group: PFMT [(4.21±0.29) vs. (3.84±0.23), t=8.27, P<0.001], RP [(9.59±1.26) cmH?O vs. (8.34±1.17) cmH?O, t=6.02, P<0.001], and VDPT [(82.74±3.36) cmH?O vs. (77.45±3.52) cmH?O, t=9.00, P<0.001]. Conclusion:Combined pelvic magnetic therapy and pelvic floor EMG biofeedback therapy demonstrates significant efficacy in treating PFD in perimenopausal women. It markedly improves bladder function and urodynamic status.

Objective To evaluate the performance of UW2000 automatic urine system .Methods Using UW2000 automatic u‐rine system ,to evaluate intra ,inter batch precision ,linear ,carryover ,and the accuracy of the urine visible components(RBC ,WBC);at the same time intra ,inter batch precision and accuracy of of urine dry chemistry component .Results The within‐run coefficients of variation(CV% ) of RBC in high ,middle and low‐value samples were 15 .6% ,6 .8% ,20 .3% ,WBC were 16 .4% ,10 .5% ,24 .6% , respectively .Inter‐run precision of variation(CV% ) of RBC in middle and low‐value were 12 .8% ,13 .2% ,WBC were 15 .3% , 22 .8% ,respectively .The correlation coefficient of RBC was 0 .991 and the linear range was 88-19 513/μL .The correlation coeffi‐cient of WBC was 0 .997 and the linear range was 7-8 254/μL .And carryover rate was 0 .00% for RBC and 0 .06% for WBC ;The coefficient of UW2000 and microscopy on RBC and WBC were 0 .992 ,0 .995 .Within‐run precision ,inter‐run precision and accuracy for urine dry chemical composition of high ,low controls were all within the requirements of standards .Conclusion UW2000 auto‐matic urine analyzer workstation was not only save manpower ,but also with high detection speed and save cost .Importantly ,the re‐sults are reliability .In addition ,it could meet the working requirement in the general hospital ,and has great application value .