Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the occurrence of lymphedema as a side effect in patients who underwent regional nodal irradiation (RNI) following surgery for breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery from July 2014 to October 2020 at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital. The analysis included 113 cT1-3N1-3M0 breast cancer patients who underwent RNI as part of radiotherapy (RT). Mostly, surgeries were performed using breast-conserving surgery (n = 99, 87.6%), except for 14 patients with modified radical mastectomy. The total RT dose for RNI was 45–60 Gy, and the fraction size was 1.8–2.0 Gy. Most patients underwent chemotherapy (n = 98, 86.7%), including taxanes (n = 92, 81.4%). Results: The median follow-up was 61.1 months (range, 5.0–110.5 months). Lymphedema occurred in 54 patients (47.8%) after surgery. Twenty of them (17.7%) developed a new onset of lymphedema after RT, while 34 (30.1%) detected lymphedema before the completion of RT. Over the follow-up, 16 patients (14.2%) experienced recurrence. High radiation dose (>50.4 Gy) for RNI (P = 0.003) and taxane use (P = 0.038) were related to lymphedema occurrence after RT. Moreover, lymphedema occurrence after RT was also related to recurrence after surgical resection (P = 0.026). Breast-conserving surgery was related to early-onset lymphedema before the completion of RT (P = 0.047). Furthermore, the degree of lymph node dissection (≤4) was related to the overall occurrence of lymphedema (P = 0.045). Conclusion Considering a reduction in RNI dose may be beneficial in mitigating the incidence of lymphedema after RT in patients with breast cancer.

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether patients with esophageal cancer with a low baseline body mass index (BMI) have a poor prognosis following radiotherapy (RT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 50 patients with esophageal cancer to determine whether a low starting BMI (before RT) was associated with a poor outcome. All study participants were diagnosed with non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Results: The number of patients at each T stage were as follows: 7 (14%) patients at T1, 18 (36%) at T2, 19 (38%) at T3, and 6 (12%) at T4. Based on BMI, 7 (14%) patients were defined as underweight. A low BMI was common in patients with T3/T4 stage esophageal cancer (7/43, p = 0.01). Overall, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 26.3% and 69.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, clinical factors associated with poor PFS included being underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2; p = 0.011) and a positive N status (p = 0.017). Univariate analysis also revealed that being underweight was associated with a decrease in OS (p = 0.003). However, being underweight was not an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Conclusion Patients with esophageal SCC with a low starting BMI (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) are more prone to have a negative survival outcome following RT than patients who are considered to be normal weight or overweight. For this reason, it is important that clinicians pay more attention to BMI when treating patients with esophageal SCC.

Background: In patients with early-stage breast cancer, the treatment results of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) and conventional RT are evaluated in efficacy and cost. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 280 patients with early-stage (Tis-2N0M0) breast cancer (including 100 hypofractionated RT patients) with regards to treatment outcomes according to the RT schedule. The median whole-breast RT dose was 42.56 Gy/16 fractions for hypofractionated RT and 50.4 Gy/28 fractions for conventional RT. Most patients (n = 260, 92.9%) additionally received a tumor bed boost RT. We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to balance the baseline risk factors for recurrence. The co-primary endpoints of this study were disease-free survival (DFS) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).DFS or IBTR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test. Results: Total 89 pairs of matched patients (1:1 matching, n = 178) were finally evaluated.The median follow-up was 23.6 months. After matching, the 3-year DFS was 100% in the hypofractionated RT group and 98.4% in the conventional RT group; there was no significant difference in DFS between the groups (P = 0.374). Furthermore, the IBTR did not differ between the hypofractionated RT and conventional RT groups (P = 0.374) after matching. The 3-year overall survival was not different between two groups (both 100%). Hypofractionated RT saved 26.6% of the total cost of RT compared to conventional RT. Additionally, the acute skin toxicity rate (≥ grade 2) was also not significantly different between the groups (hypofractionated RT: 10.1% vs. conventional RT: 2.2%). Conclusion Hypofractionated RT showed good IBTR and DFS, which were compatible to those in conventional RT in breast cancer. Hypofractionated RT is expected to be used more widely because of its low cost and convenience.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the feasibility of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) as a predictive factor for prognosis in early stage primary lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven T1-3N0M0 primary lung cancer patients treated with curative SBRT between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Four patients (14.8%) treated with SBRT to address residual tumor after wedge resection and one patient (3.7%) with local recurrence after resection were included. The SUVmax at baseline PET/CT was assessed to determine its relationship with prognosis after SBRT. Patients were divided into two groups based on maximum SUVmax on pre-treatment FDG PET/CT, estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 17.7 months (range, 2.3 to 60.0 months). The actuarial 2-year local control, progressionfree survival (PFS), and overall survival were 80.4%, 66.0%, and 78.2%, respectively. With regard to failure patterns, 5 patients exhibited local failure (in-field failure, 18.5%), 1 (3.7%) experienced regional nodal relapse, and other 2 (7.4%) developed distant failure. SUVmax was significantly correlated with progression (p = 0.08, optimal cut-off point SUVmax > 5.1). PFS was significantly influenced by pretreatment SUVmax (SUVmax > 5.1 vs. SUVmax ≤ 5.1; p = 0.012) and T stage (T1 vs. T2-3; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: SUVmax at pre-treatment FDG PET/CT demonstrated a predictive value for PFS after SBRT for lung cancer.
Disease-Free Survival ; Electrons ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; Lung ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography ; Prognosis ; Radiosurgery ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve

PURPOSE: Proliferation marker Ki-67 is widely used in cancer prognosis prediction. We tried to investigate the role of Ki-67 as a prognostic factor in stomach cancer after surgery in this study. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 251 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer from 2010 to 2015. In pathologic examination, Ki-67 labeling index was defined as the percentage of Ki-67 antigen positive cells. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 for gastric cancer was evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed as a primary end-point. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 28.0 months. Thirty-one patients (12.4%) showed Ki-67 labeling index (LI) lower than 25%. Sixty-eight patients (26.6%) showed recurrence during follow-up period. Recurrence was associated with Ki-67 LI level (≤25%, P = 0.016), and lymph node metastasis status (P = 0.002). High Ki-67 LI level (>25%) was also related to p53 positivity (P < 0.001) and poorly cohesive type (P = 0.002). The 3-year DFS was 69.4%. Low Ki-67 LI level (≤25%) was related with low DFS (47.6% vs. 72.6%, P = 0.016). T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P = 0.006), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.010), and neuronal invasion (P = 0.001) also affected the DFS. In addition, T stage (P = 0.03) and Ki-67 LI (P = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 239, 93.4%), low Ki-67 (≤25%) was a poor prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Low Ki-67 LI predicts high rate of progression and low DFS of stomach cancer. Ki-67 LI can be a predictive marker in resected stomach cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ki-67 Antigen ; Lymph Nodes ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neurons ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms* ; Stomach*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on local failure-free survival rate (LFFS) for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) invading the trachea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with locally advanced PTC invading the trachea were treated with surgical resection. After surgery, 21 patients received adjuvant EBRT and radioactive iodine therapy (EBRT group) and 35 patients were treated with radioactive iodine therapy (control group). RESULTS: The age range was 26–87 years (median, 56 years). The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 4 to 145 months). EBRT doses ranged from 50.4 to 66 Gy (median, 60 Gy). Esophagus invasion and gross residual disease was more frequent in the EBRT group. In the control group, local recurrence developed in 9 (9/35, 26%) and new distant metastasis in 2 (2/35, 6%) patients, occurring 4 to 68 months (median, 37 months) and 53 to 68 months (median, 60 months) after surgery, respectively. Two patients had simultaneous local recurrence and new distant metastasis. There was one local failure in the EBRT group at 18 months after surgery (1/21, 5%). The 5-year LFFS was 95% in the EBRT group and 63% in the control group (p = 0.103). In the EBRT group, one late grade 2 xerostomia was developed. CONCLUSION: Although, EBRT group had a higher incidence of esophagus invasion and gross residual disease, EBRT group showed a better 5-year LFFS. Adjuvant EBRT may have contributed to the better LFFS in these patients.
Esophagus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Iodine ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Radiotherapy ; Recurrence ; Survival Rate ; Thyroid Gland* ; Thyroid Neoplasms* ; Trachea* ; Xerostomia

The authors noticed that the original version of this paper contains typographical error in Fig. 2.
Body Weight* ; Humans ; Radiotherapy* ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*