Objective To explore the characteristics,potential challenges,and optimization paths of high-quality development policies for public hospitals in China,and to provide reference for policy formulation and implementation.Methods The 31 policy documents on high-quality development of public hospitals issued at the central and provincial levels between 2021 and 2024 were coded using Nvivo 11 software,and a three-dimensional analytical framework was constructed on the basis of the policy tools,stakeholders,and system dimensions,combining both quantitative and qualitative methods for content analysis.Results It found that the distribution of policy content in the three dimensions was characterized by stage imbalance:policy tools were mainly environmental,followed by supply,and demand;stakeholder attention was focused on public hospitals and healthcare administrations,and patient attention was low;The system dimension focused mainly on the macro level,with less distribution at the meso and micro levels.Although the unbalanced distribution of policy instruments is relevant at certain stages,the long-term structural imbalance may lead to insufficient systemic policies and weakened stakeholder synergies,and there is an urgent need to optimize the structure of instruments.Conclusions It is recommended to increase the proportion of demand-based policy instruments in policy design and dynamically adjust the synergistic application of the three types of instruments;to strengthen the attention to vulnerable stakeholders,such as patients;and to optimize the design of policies at the meso-levels and micro-levels in order to enhance the systemicity and sustainability of policy implementation.

Objective To explore the characteristics,potential challenges,and optimization paths of high-quality development policies for public hospitals in China,and to provide reference for policy formulation and implementation.Methods The 31 policy documents on high-quality development of public hospitals issued at the central and provincial levels between 2021 and 2024 were coded using Nvivo 11 software,and a three-dimensional analytical framework was constructed on the basis of the policy tools,stakeholders,and system dimensions,combining both quantitative and qualitative methods for content analysis.Results It found that the distribution of policy content in the three dimensions was characterized by stage imbalance:policy tools were mainly environmental,followed by supply,and demand;stakeholder attention was focused on public hospitals and healthcare administrations,and patient attention was low;The system dimension focused mainly on the macro level,with less distribution at the meso and micro levels.Although the unbalanced distribution of policy instruments is relevant at certain stages,the long-term structural imbalance may lead to insufficient systemic policies and weakened stakeholder synergies,and there is an urgent need to optimize the structure of instruments.Conclusions It is recommended to increase the proportion of demand-based policy instruments in policy design and dynamically adjust the synergistic application of the three types of instruments;to strengthen the attention to vulnerable stakeholders,such as patients;and to optimize the design of policies at the meso-levels and micro-levels in order to enhance the systemicity and sustainability of policy implementation.

OBJECTIVE To analyze the traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） emergency management policy texts in China， reveal the characteristics， problems and improvement directions of Chinese medicine emergency management policies in China， and provide references and lessons for improving the level of Chinese medicine emergency management. METHODS Twenty-four TCM emergency management policy texts issued at the central level from 2016 to 2023 were coded and analyzed using Nvivo11 software to construct a three-dimensional analysis framework based on policy tools， stakeholders and policy strength. RESULTS In the policy tools dimension， the environmental type was the most （46.74%）， the supply type was the second （31.80%）， and the demand type was the least （21.46%）； in the stakeholder dimension， there were more healthcare institutions （40.63%） and government departments （31.25%）， and fewer healthcare workers （14.84%） and residents （13.28%）； in the policy strength dimension， the overall policy strength was poor， and the differences in effectiveness across policy instruments and stakeholders were more significant. The cross-cutting results showed that there was a certain degree of mismatch in policy instruments， stakeholders and policy strength. CONCLUSIONS The use of supply-oriented policy tools is slightly lacking， and the use of policy tools should be optimized in a coordinated manner； the distribution of stakeholders is relatively unbalanced， and synergies among stakeholders should be enhanced； the overall strength of policies is poor， and the top-level design of relevant policies should be improved.