Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis worldwide and represents a growing global health burden. It arises from hyperuricemia resulting from disordered purine metabolism, leading to monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition and recurrent inflammatory arthritis. Although hyperuricemia is the principal risk factor, genetic susceptibility, impaired urate transport, and emerging factors such as the gut microbiota also contribute to disease development. Acute flares are mediated by MSU crystal-induced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent interleukin-1β production, whereas chronic inflammation results in tophus formation and structural joint damage. Gout is closely associated with metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease, which contribute to persistently elevated mortality. Although advances in imaging and pharmacologic therapy have improved diagnosis and management, the real-world use of urate-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Further research and sustained efforts by healthcare professionals are needed to improve long-term disease control.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the densitometric characteristics and qualitative bone status in patients with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) compared with those in controls who were younger adults under 50 years. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 controls and 31 patients with PHPT who underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH). Trabecular bone score (TBS) was derived from LS DXA images. Bone mineral density (BMD) values were assessed using Z-scores, and correlations between TBS, BMD, and laboratory parameters were examined. Results: The median ages of the control and PHPT groups were 41 and 42 years, respectively. The proportion of individuals classified as “below the expected range for age” based on Z-scores differed significantly between groups only when considering any site collectively. Median TBS was significantly lower in PHPT patients than in controls, even when BMD values at LS, FN, and TH fell within similar diagnostic categories. In controls, TBS and BMD demonstrated very low correlation coefficients. In contrast, PHPT patients showed a stronger correlation between TBS and femoral BMD, whereas the association between TBS and LS BMD was largely absent. Among laboratory markers, only serum intact parathyroid hormone was significantly negatively correlated with TBS. Conclusions Young adults with PHPT exhibit impaired bone quality despite relatively preserved BMD, suggesting early microarchitectural deterioration. These findings support the combined use of LS and femoral BMD with TBS for more accurate assessment of skeletal health in PHPT.

Traditional hyperthermia involves increasing the temperature at the tumor site to above 39 ℃, inducing death in cancer cells. Although hyperthermia is an effective cancer treatment, its clinical application has decreased due to potential complications, including damage to surrounding normal tissue. In recent years, modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment modality. mEHT selectively heats tumor cells to 42–43 °C, while reducing the average temperature in the treatment area, including the surrounding normal tissue, compared to conventional methods. Additionally, mEHT may be used in combination with systemic chemotherapy and radiation therapy in tumor treatment, providing a synergistic effect to increase efficacy. As chemotherapy and radiation therapy technologies advance, the application of combined mEHT may improve clinical outcomes. In this study, we review and discuss reports on the clinical outcomes of mEHT combined with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, which are established anticancer treatments.

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder that causes vulnerability of bones to fracture owing to reduction in bone density and deterioration of the bone tissue microstructure. The prevalence of osteoporosis is higher in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), than in those of the general population. In this autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease, in addition to known risk factors for osteoporosis, various factors such as chronic inflammation, autoantibodies, metabolic disorders, drugs, and decreased physical activity contribute to additional risk. In RA, disease-related inflammation plays an important role in local or systemic bone loss, and active treatment for inflammation can help prevent osteoporosis. In addition to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs that have been traditionally used for treatment of RA, biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs have been widely used. These agents can be employed more selectively and precisely based on disease pathogenesis. It has been reported that these drugs can inhibit bone loss by not only reducing inflammation in RA, but also by inhibiting bone resorption and promoting bone formation. In this review, the pathogenesis and research results of the increase in osteoporosis in RA are reviewed, and the effects of biological agents on osteoporosis are discussed.

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength resulting in a predisposition to fracture. Osteoporosis-related fractures can lead to pain, disability, and increased healthcare costs. We aimed to explore the guidelines and criteria for selecting medications for osteoporosis.Current Concepts: Osteoporosis medications can be classified mainly as antiresorptive drugs and osteogenesis promoters. The former includes selective estrogen receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, and receptor activators of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitors, e.g., denosumab. The latter includes human parathyroid hormone, e.g., teriparatide, and the dual-action agent, romosozumab. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene or bazedoxifene) can be considered suitable for younger postmenopausal women with low spine bone mineral density. It also can be used for patients with low glomerular filtration rates due to low excretion in urine and patients who need dental care. Bisphosphonate has a residual effect on bone; therefore, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical fractures should be considered as side effects for its long-term use. Presently, denosumab is the most potent antiresorptive agent, but its favorable skeletal effects can be reversed quickly after its cessation. Therefore, subsequent antiresorptive treatment is mandatory. Romosozumab is a dual-action agent that simultaneously stimulates bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. It also needs a subsequent antiresorptive treatment.Discussion and Conclusion: Tailored treatment is needed in a patient with osteoporosis. Even in the case of the same bone density, the risk of fracture and the fracture sites differ depending on age. After setting an achievable goal of bone density within a suitable period, the appropriate medication should be selected.

Catastrophic health expenditure refers to measure the level of the economic burden of households due to medical expenses. The purpose of this study was to examine the proportion of households that experienced catastrophic health expenditure between 2006 and 2018 using available data from the National Survey of Tax and Benefit (NaSTaB), Korea Health Panel (KHP), and Households Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES). Trend test was used to analyze the proportion of household with catastrophic healthcare expenditure. The households experienced the catastrophic health expenditure 2.08% in 2018 using the NaSTaB data. Trend analysis was significant with the decreasing trend (Annual Percentage Change [APC], -4.88; p<0.0001) in the proportion of households with the catastrophic health expenditure. On the other hand, the results of the HIES showed 2.92%, and KHP showed 2.48% of households experienced the catastrophic health expenditure in 2016. The trend was significantly increased in HIES (APC, 1.43; p<0.0001) and KHP (APC, 6.68; p<0.0001). Therefore, this suggests that further interventions to alleviate the burden of catastrophic health expenditure to the low-income group are needed.

Objective: . To investigate the impact of the amendment of the Korean National Health Insurance (KNHI) reimbursement criteria for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents based on from conventional clinical and laboratory measurements to disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) on treatment pattern, clinical response, and persistence rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: . This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated 148 RA patients eligible for the initiation of anti- TNF-α agents as the first-line biologics by either the past (n=95) or current (n=53) KNHI reimbursement criteria. Persistence was defined as the duration between the initiation and discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents. Results: . In total, 106 (71.6%), 35 (23.6%), and 7 (4.7%) RA patients started treatment with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively. RA patients who received anti-TNF-α agents under the current reimbursement criteria had a significantly lower mean DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (6.02 vs. 6.95, p＜0.001) and daily prednisolone-equivalent glucocorticoid dose (4.51 vs. 6.17 mg, p＜0.001) than those who received anti-TNF-α agents under the past reimbursement criteria. No significant differences in the 1-year remission rate defined by DAS28-ESR＜2.6 (17.9% vs. 30.2%, p=0.085) and the persistence rate (p=0.703) between the past and current reimbursement criteria was observed. Conclusion . Our data suggest that less active RA patients can receive reimbursement for anti-TNF-α agents under the current criteria, and the amendment of the KNHI reimbursement criteria may improve access to anti-TNF-α agents without affecting the treatment response and persistence rate.

Catastrophic health expenditure refers to spending more than a certain level of household's income on healthcare expenditure. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of households that experienced catastrophic health expenditure between 2006 and 2017 with the National Survey of Tax and Benefit (NaSTaB) and between 2011 to 2016 using Households Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) data. The results of the NaSTaB showed 2.16% of households experienced the catastrophic health expenditure in 2017. In trend analysis, the NaSTaB revealed a statistically significant decreasing trend (annual percentage change [APC]=−2.01, p<0.001) in the proportion of households with the catastrophic health expenditure. On the other hand, the results of the HIES showed 2.92% of households experienced the catastrophic health expenditure in 2016. Also, there was a slightly increasing trend (APC=1.43, p<0.001). In subgroup analysis, groups with lower income levels were likely to experience catastrophic health expenditure. In conclusion, further public support system is needed to lower experience these healthcare expenditures and monitor the low income group.
Delivery of Health Care ; Family Characteristics ; Hand ; Health Expenditures ; Korea ; Taxes