Basal cell adenocarcinoma, considered to be the malignant counterpart of basal cell adenoma, is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor of the salivary glands, accounting for 1-2% of salivary gland malignancies. It predominantly affects the parotid gland, while involvement of the minor salivary glands is exceptionally rare. This report presented a case of basal cell adenocarcinoma involving the left retromolar trigone in a 54-year-old woman. The initial provisional diagnosis suggested a benign or low-grade malignant salivary tumor. Advanced magnetic resonance imagingtechniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, aided in the preoperative prediction of malignancy, and an incisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of basal cell adenocarcinoma. This caseunderscored the challenge of distinguishing basal cell adenocarcinoma from benign salivary tumors, as clinical and imaging features often overlap. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment, yielding favorable outcomes;however, long-term follow-up is crucial due to the risk of recurrence.

Basal cell adenocarcinoma, considered to be the malignant counterpart of basal cell adenoma, is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor of the salivary glands, accounting for 1-2% of salivary gland malignancies. It predominantly affects the parotid gland, while involvement of the minor salivary glands is exceptionally rare. This report presented a case of basal cell adenocarcinoma involving the left retromolar trigone in a 54-year-old woman. The initial provisional diagnosis suggested a benign or low-grade malignant salivary tumor. Advanced magnetic resonance imagingtechniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, aided in the preoperative prediction of malignancy, and an incisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of basal cell adenocarcinoma. This caseunderscored the challenge of distinguishing basal cell adenocarcinoma from benign salivary tumors, as clinical and imaging features often overlap. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment, yielding favorable outcomes;however, long-term follow-up is crucial due to the risk of recurrence.

Basal cell adenocarcinoma, considered to be the malignant counterpart of basal cell adenoma, is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor of the salivary glands, accounting for 1-2% of salivary gland malignancies. It predominantly affects the parotid gland, while involvement of the minor salivary glands is exceptionally rare. This report presented a case of basal cell adenocarcinoma involving the left retromolar trigone in a 54-year-old woman. The initial provisional diagnosis suggested a benign or low-grade malignant salivary tumor. Advanced magnetic resonance imagingtechniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, aided in the preoperative prediction of malignancy, and an incisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of basal cell adenocarcinoma. This caseunderscored the challenge of distinguishing basal cell adenocarcinoma from benign salivary tumors, as clinical and imaging features often overlap. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment, yielding favorable outcomes;however, long-term follow-up is crucial due to the risk of recurrence.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the number of roots and type of root canals in maxillary first and secondpremolars within a selected Korean population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, it sought to investigate potential differences in these features according to sex and tooth type. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 585 maxillary first premolars and 578 maxillary second premolars from303 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The number of roots was classified based on root morphology, andcanal configurations were categorized into 8 types according to the Vertucci classification. For statistical analysis, chi-square or Fisher exact tests were employed to compare root number and canal morphology according to sex andtooth type. Results: CBCT analysis revealed that 71.5% of maxillary first premolars and 97.6% of maxillary second premolars had 1 root. The most common canal configuration in maxillary first premolars was Vertucci type IV (42.6%), whereas type I predominated in maxillary second premolars (76.5%). Significant differences in root number and canal configurations were found between men and women (P<0.05), with single roots and Vertucci type I canals more commonly observed in women. Conclusion Both maxillary first premolars and maxillary second premolars typically had 1 root, with a smaller percentage possessing 2 roots. Significant sex differences were observed in root number and canal type. This study highlights the variability in root number and canal configuration, emphasizing the importance of recognizing thesevariations to achieve successful endodontic treatment.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the number of roots and type of root canals in maxillary first and secondpremolars within a selected Korean population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, it sought to investigate potential differences in these features according to sex and tooth type. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 585 maxillary first premolars and 578 maxillary second premolars from303 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The number of roots was classified based on root morphology, andcanal configurations were categorized into 8 types according to the Vertucci classification. For statistical analysis, chi-square or Fisher exact tests were employed to compare root number and canal morphology according to sex andtooth type. Results: CBCT analysis revealed that 71.5% of maxillary first premolars and 97.6% of maxillary second premolars had 1 root. The most common canal configuration in maxillary first premolars was Vertucci type IV (42.6%), whereas type I predominated in maxillary second premolars (76.5%). Significant differences in root number and canal configurations were found between men and women (P<0.05), with single roots and Vertucci type I canals more commonly observed in women. Conclusion Both maxillary first premolars and maxillary second premolars typically had 1 root, with a smaller percentage possessing 2 roots. Significant sex differences were observed in root number and canal type. This study highlights the variability in root number and canal configuration, emphasizing the importance of recognizing thesevariations to achieve successful endodontic treatment.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the number of roots and type of root canals in maxillary first and secondpremolars within a selected Korean population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, it sought to investigate potential differences in these features according to sex and tooth type. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 585 maxillary first premolars and 578 maxillary second premolars from303 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The number of roots was classified based on root morphology, andcanal configurations were categorized into 8 types according to the Vertucci classification. For statistical analysis, chi-square or Fisher exact tests were employed to compare root number and canal morphology according to sex andtooth type. Results: CBCT analysis revealed that 71.5% of maxillary first premolars and 97.6% of maxillary second premolars had 1 root. The most common canal configuration in maxillary first premolars was Vertucci type IV (42.6%), whereas type I predominated in maxillary second premolars (76.5%). Significant differences in root number and canal configurations were found between men and women (P<0.05), with single roots and Vertucci type I canals more commonly observed in women. Conclusion Both maxillary first premolars and maxillary second premolars typically had 1 root, with a smaller percentage possessing 2 roots. Significant sex differences were observed in root number and canal type. This study highlights the variability in root number and canal configuration, emphasizing the importance of recognizing thesevariations to achieve successful endodontic treatment.

A central odontogenic fibroma is a rare benign tumor composed of mature fibrous connective tissue with variable amounts of odontogenic epithelium. It appears at similar rates in the maxilla and mandible. In the maxilla, it usually occurs anterior to the molars. Radiographically, central odontogenic fibroma commonly presents as a multilocular or unilocular radiolucency with a distinct border. This paper reports a case of an aggressive central odontogenic fibroma involving the right posterior maxilla of a 53-year-old man. Radiographs showed an extensive soft tissue mass involving the entire right maxilla with frank bone resorption. The patient had a history of 2 operations in the region, both more than 2 decades ago. Although it was impossible to confirm the previous diagnoses, it was presumed that this case was a recurrent lesion.

Purpose: This study investigated whether the relationship between the maxillary sinus and the root of the maxillary premolar is correlated with the root position and whether there is a difference in the long axis angle of premolars and the buccal bone thickness according to the sinus-root relationship and root position. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 587 maxillary first premolars and 580 second premolars from 303 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The maxillary sinus floor-root relationship was classified into 4 types, and the root position in the alveolar bone was evaluated as buccal, middle, or palatal. The long axis angle of the maxillary premolars in the alveolar bone and the buccal bone thickness were measured. The correlation between these parameters was analyzed. Results: The maxillary sinus floor-root relationship showed a statistically significant correlation with the root position in the alveolar bone. Most maxillary first premolars were buccally located, and more than half of the second premolars had their roots in the middle. The long axis angle of the premolars was significantly larger in buccal-positioned teeth than in middle-positioned teeth, and the buccal bone was thinner. Conclusion When the root of the maxillary premolar was separated from the sinus floor, the premolar was often located on the buccal side. Most of the maxillary first premolars had a thinner buccal bone and larger inclination than the second premolars. It is recommended to evaluate the root position, sagittal angle and buccal bone thickness using CBCT for implant treatment planning.

Ameloblastic carcinoma is a rare odontogenic malignant tumor with the histologic features of both ameloblastoma and carcinoma. It occurs more frequently in the mandible than in the maxilla and it may appear de novo or develop from a preexisting ameloblastoma or odontogenic cyst. Rapidly progressing, painful swelling is the most common symptom, and radiographically, it shows significant bone resorption and cortical perforation. This report described a case of ameloblastic carcinoma in a 45-year-old man who presented with swelling in the left mandible. The lesion showed combined features of benign findings, such as an expansile cortex with a distinct border, and malignant findings, such as a large exophytic mass with frank bone resorption. Excisional biopsy was performed and a final diagnosis of ameloblastic carcinoma was made.

Purpose: As cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become the most widely used 3-dimensional (3D) imaging modality in the dental field, storage space and costs for large-capacity data have become an important issue. Therefore, if 3D data can be stored at a clinically acceptable compression rate, the burden in terms of storage space and cost can be reduced and data can be managed more efficiently. In this study, a deep learning network for super-resolution was tested to restore compressed virtual CBCT images. Materials and Methods: Virtual CBCT image data were created with a publicly available online dataset (CQ500) of multidetector computed tomography images using CBCT reconstruction software (TIGRE). A very deep superresolution (VDSR) network was trained to restore high-resolution virtual CBCT images from the low-resolution virtual CBCT images. Results: The images reconstructed by VDSR showed better image quality than bicubic interpolation in restored images at various scale ratios. The highest scale ratio with clinically acceptable reconstruction accuracy using VDSR was 2.1. Conclusion VDSR showed promising restoration accuracy in this study. In the future, it will be necessary to experiment with new deep learning algorithms and large-scale data for clinical application of this technology.