Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to understand the actual situation of shared decision-making (SDM) and identify the challenges of implementing SDM among Japanese gynecologic cancer patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods: Adult Japanese women undergoing chemotherapy for endometrial or ovarian/ fallopian tube cancer and HCPs who prescribed/administered treatment were enrolled. Data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Primary endpoints were the actual and desired status of SDM for patients by preferred role (active, collaborative, passive), and important aspects in drug selection for patients and HCPs. SDM treatment preferences were determined using the Control Preferences Scale. Results: Respondents comprised 154 patients (77 for endometrial and 77 for ovarian/fallopian tube cancer), 153 physicians, 166 nurses, and 154 pharmacists. Among patients, 53.9% desired an active role in decision-making, and 55.8% participated; 25.3% desired a collaborative role, and 14.3% participated; and 20.8% desired a passive role, and 29.9% participated.Most patients with a collaborative role in decision-making (86.4%) were “very satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with their communication with physicians, compared with 60.4% and 73.9% of respondents with active and passive roles in decision-making, respectively. In daily practice, 23.5%, 47.6%, and 19.5% of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, respectively, confirmed “awareness” of SDM. Regarding treatment expectations, patients ranked “complete elimination of cancer,” and HCPs ranked “live longer” as the most important. Conclusion Most patients desire involvement in their treatment decisions. Additionally, treatment expectations differ between patients and HCPs. Increasing SDM awareness, implementing it systematically, and addressing patients’ needs for collaborative roles in decision-making is essential.

Purpose: This study aimed to report on the multidisciplinary web conferences for patients with heart failure to strengthen medical collaboration and provide seamless support. Method: We described and analyzed the web conferences by retrospectively collecting data on the conferences. Result: Main subjects of the conferences were those who lived alone and had inadequate nursing care, and those to whom the intervention of multidisciplinary professionals needed to be strengthened to prevent readmission. Using web conferencing tools, we shared issues and solutions for discharge with considering the anonymity of the patient’s personal information. The conferences were held once weekly for 30 minutes when the patients were in the stages of preliminary discharge planning. Participating physicians and healthcare professionals included cardiologists, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, nutritionists, palliative care physicians, and home doctors. The cardiology staff used a multifaceted checklist to clarify issues while sharing the patient’s condition and treatment plan. The palliative care physicians made suggestions about value-based treatment plans and decision support, and the home doctor made suggestions about home services, drug adjustment, and lifestyle guidance necessary to prevent readmission. Discussion: Further improvement in the web conferences and evaluation on the effect of the conferences are needed.

  Committee for Information Infrastructure in the 16th term of JSME Board Members was newly created to edit Medical Education White Book issued every four years and to provide sooner and more comprehensive information infrastructure provision. MEAL was opened as a website for medical education information since August 2011. MEAL consists of glossary, articles, books and more resources using a system like Wiki or Blog on the Web. By such technological progress, not only one–way information provision from JSME but also bidirectional communication between JSME members and committees／board members became available. Internationally, similar websites are known, such as MedEdPORTAL by AAMC （Association of American Medical Colleges）, and expected to be new scholarly information added to journals.

“Cardiac Cycle: The First Step, ” which discretely, non-ambiguously, and accurately presents basic essential information on the cardiac cycle, was compared with conventional material in terms of educational efficiency. Twenty-six first-year medical students were randomly assigned to either material. The conventional group was presented with a standard textbook with a typical figure and text. The students were blinded as to the origin of the materials. After self-study, the same quiz (30 two-item choice questions asking basic essential information) was given to both groups and was scored by a blinded rater. The number of correct answers was 25.7±3.7 (mean±SD) in the conventional group and 29.4±1.1 in the ‘first-step group’(p<0.01).