Objective:To compare the effect of empirical cefazolin and vancomycin on the adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis patients.Methods:This was a retrospective analysis of a single-centre prospective cohort. Clinical data of consecutive PD-related peritonitis episodes occurring for the first time in patients (≥18 years) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2021 were reviewed. Patients were classified into a cefazolin group or a vancomycin group according to the empirical antibiotic regimen. The primary endpoint was peritonitis-related death within 1 month of onset and the secondary endpoint was transfer to haemodialysis for peritonitis-related reasons within the same period. Differences in both endpoints between the two regimens were analysed in the overall population and in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes associated with antibiotic choice. Propensity-score matching was performed to control for confounding bias.Results:A total of 516 eligible PD patients developed peritonitis during the study period were included, among whom 138 received empirical cefazolin and 322 received vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the cefazolin and vancomycin groups, including annual income >50 000 yuan ( χ2=17.854, P<0.001), cardiovascular disease history ( χ2=3.909, P=0.048), prior peritonitis history ( χ2=18.327, P<0.001), serum albumin ( t=2.430, P=0.013), triglycerides ( Z=-3.108, P=0.002), total cholesterol ( t=3.752, P<0.001), phosphate ( t=3.362, P=0.002) and sodium ( t=3.021, P=0.004). Neither peritonitis-related mortality nor transfer to haemodialysis differed between the cefazolin and vancomycin groups in the overall cohort or in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup (all P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis (univariable and multivariable) showed that empirical vancomycin was not associated with a higher risk of adverse outcome when compared with cefazolin in the overall cohort or in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup (all P>0.05). After propensity-score matching, results remained consistent (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Empirical cefazolin and vancomycin yield similar rates of short-term adverse outcomes in patients with PD-associated peritonitis, including those caused by Gram-positive organisms.

Medical equipment, as an important indicator of smart hospital evaluation, plays a vital role in hospital operations. To ensure the safe and efficient operation of medical equipment, a reasonable performance evaluation system is indispensable. This study introduces a platform based on Internet of Things (IoT) technology that connects medical devices and collects data, achieving standardized and structured data processing, and supporting online operational supervision. Through the Delphi method, a performance evaluation system for large medical equipment is constructed, including 4 primary indicators and 22 secondary indicators. DICOM data acquisition devices are used to achieve functions such as efficiency analysis, benefit analysis, usage evaluation, and decision-making support for medical equipment. The study is still in its early stages, and in the future, it is expected to integrate more types of equipment, achieve rational resource allocation, and significantly impact decision-making for the development of public hospitals.
Internet of Things ; Delphi Technique

Objective:To compare the effect of empirical cefazolin and vancomycin on the adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis patients.Methods:This was a retrospective analysis of a single-centre prospective cohort. Clinical data of consecutive PD-related peritonitis episodes occurring for the first time in patients (≥18 years) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2021 were reviewed. Patients were classified into a cefazolin group or a vancomycin group according to the empirical antibiotic regimen. The primary endpoint was peritonitis-related death within 1 month of onset and the secondary endpoint was transfer to haemodialysis for peritonitis-related reasons within the same period. Differences in both endpoints between the two regimens were analysed in the overall population and in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes associated with antibiotic choice. Propensity-score matching was performed to control for confounding bias.Results:A total of 516 eligible PD patients developed peritonitis during the study period were included, among whom 138 received empirical cefazolin and 322 received vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the cefazolin and vancomycin groups, including annual income >50 000 yuan ( χ2=17.854, P<0.001), cardiovascular disease history ( χ2=3.909, P=0.048), prior peritonitis history ( χ2=18.327, P<0.001), serum albumin ( t=2.430, P=0.013), triglycerides ( Z=-3.108, P=0.002), total cholesterol ( t=3.752, P<0.001), phosphate ( t=3.362, P=0.002) and sodium ( t=3.021, P=0.004). Neither peritonitis-related mortality nor transfer to haemodialysis differed between the cefazolin and vancomycin groups in the overall cohort or in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup (all P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis (univariable and multivariable) showed that empirical vancomycin was not associated with a higher risk of adverse outcome when compared with cefazolin in the overall cohort or in the Gram-positive peritonitis subgroup (all P>0.05). After propensity-score matching, results remained consistent (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Empirical cefazolin and vancomycin yield similar rates of short-term adverse outcomes in patients with PD-associated peritonitis, including those caused by Gram-positive organisms.

Objective To explore the anti-tumor effect of 17XL strains of Plasmodium yoelii(P.y)infection on melanoma in mice. Methods B16F10 tumor cells were axillarilly injected into the right flank of 20 C57BL/6 mice to establish tumor-bearing mouse models. The next day,the mice were randomly divided into a P.y infection group and control group,10 mice each group. Each mouse of the P.y infection group was intraperitoneally injected with 1×106 red blood cells including 20% P.y infection red blood cells,and each one of the control group were intraperitoneally injected with 1×106 normal red blood cells of C57BL/6 mice. The time of tumor formation of the mice in the two groups was observed and the tumor volumes were measured. Results The time of tumor formation in the P.y infection group[(11.30 ± 0.21)d]was significantly later than that in the control group [(10.40 ± 0.22)d](P < 0.05). From the tumors could be accurately measured to the study end point,both the tumors of mice in the two groups were growing,and the tumor volumes of mice in the P.y infection group were significantly less than those in the control group at each time point(all P < 0.05). The growth rate of tumors in the P.y infection group[(71.10 ± 6.29)mm3/d]was significantly slower than that in the control group[(302.80 ± 49.94)mm3/d](P < 0.05),and the growth rates of tumors every day in the P.y infection group were significantly slower than those in the control group(all P < 0.05). Conclusion The P.y in-fection can delay the occurrence of tumor and inhibit the growth of melanoma.