Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is a major cause of female infertility, characterized by a complex and multifactorial etiology involving aging, genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune mechanisms. Therapeutic options for DOR remain limited, with no currently established treatments demonstrating consistently robust efficacy. Recent advances in regenerative medicine—including the use of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives, platelet-rich plasma and in vitro activation—have opened promising new avenues for ovarian function restoration. This review offers a comprehensive summary of research progress in DOR treatment over the past five years, covering hormonal therapies, assisted reproductive technologies, nutritional supplementation and lifestyle modifications, Traditional Chinese Medicine, targeted therapies, and regenerative medicine approaches, with the aim of providing guidance for clinical management of DOR.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is a major cause of female infertility, characterized by a complex and multifactorial etiology involving aging, genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune mechanisms. Therapeutic options for DOR remain limited, with no currently established treatments demonstrating consistently robust efficacy. Recent advances in regenerative medicine—including the use of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives, platelet-rich plasma and in vitro activation—have opened promising new avenues for ovarian function restoration. This review offers a comprehensive summary of research progress in DOR treatment over the past five years, covering hormonal therapies, assisted reproductive technologies, nutritional supplementation and lifestyle modifications, Traditional Chinese Medicine, targeted therapies, and regenerative medicine approaches, with the aim of providing guidance for clinical management of DOR.

Objective:To analyze the growth characteristics of different genotypes of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in different cell lines, and to provide scientific basis for the selection of cell lines in the study of JEV.Methods:BHK-21, Vero, C6/36, PK-15, DF-1, N2a, SH-sy5y and MDCK cell lines were selected. The proliferation ability of genotype 1 (NX1889 strain), genotype 3 (P3 strain) and genotype 5 (XZ0934 strain) JEV in these cell lines was evaluated by plaque assay and RT-qPCR.Results:Significant cytopathogenic effects (CPE) were observed in BHK-21, Vero, C6/36, DF-1, N2a and PK-15 cell lines across all three JEV genotypes. However, no significant differences in CPE characteristics were observed within the same cell line. SH-sy5y and MDCK cell lines did not show significant CPE, but virus proliferation was detected in SH-sy5y cell line, while MDCK cell line were found to be insensitive to JEV. No significant difference was observed in the proliferation curves of G1, G3 and G5 JEV in BHK-21, Vero and SH-sy5y cell lines. In C6/36 and PK-15 cell lines, the titer of G1 JEV was higher than that of G3 and G5. In DF-1 cell line, G5 demonstrated a higher titer than the other two genotypes, whereas in N2a cell line, G5 showed a lower titer than the other two.Conclusions:There are differences in the proliferation of three different genotypes of JEV in different cell lines, which can provide reference for the study of JEV in different directions.