Background: Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Results: During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group—peg-moving (hazard ratio [HR]=1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.87) and circle drawing (HR=1.66, 95% CI 1.15–2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving, 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing, 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points. Conclusion Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.

Destructive aortic valve endocarditis or poor controlled aortitis cause the development of left ventricular-aortic discontinuity. We reported our experience with aortic root replacement for cases of severe aortic annular destruction. Between 1999 and 2006, 9 patients with severe aortic annular destruction underwent aortic root replacement at our institute. There were 8 men and one women with a mean age of 55 years. Seven patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III. Four of 9 patients had native valve endocarditis, 4 had prosthetic valve endocarditis (previous aortic valve replacements in 2, aortic root replacements in 2) and one had active aortitis with a detached mechanical valve. Radical debridement of the infected cavity and necrotic tissue was performed in all cases, followed by reconstruction of the aortic annulus using autologous or xenogenic pericardium in 3 cases. Antibiotic-saturated fibrin glue was applied to the cavity. Aortic root replacement was achieved with a pulmonary autograft (Ross procedure) in 4 and stentless aortic root xenograft in 4. One patient who had advanced liver cirrhosis underwent aortic valve replacement with a stentless xenograft by subcoronary implantation method. No mortality was observed during hospitalization and follow-up. Reoperation within 5 years was not necessary in 66.7% of the patients. Excellent outcome can be achieved by radical exclusion of the abscess cavity and viable pulmonary autograft or stentless aortic root xenograft in patients with severe aortic annular destruction.