OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of acalabrutinib， zanubrutinib， and ibrutinib as first-line treatments for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia （CLL）. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed to simulate the 10-year disease progression of treatment-naive CLL patients. The model used a 4-week cycle length， and an annual discount rate of 4.5% was applied to both costs and health outcomes. Relevant clinical trial literature was systematically reviewed， and survival data for each treatment strategy were extracted. Using the ibrutinib arm from the RESONATE-2 trial as the anchor arm， an anchored indirect comparison approach was performed to estimate the relative treatment effects of acalabrutinib group and zanubrutinib group versus ibrutinib group. Survival curves for progression-free survival and overall survival for each treatment strategy were generated by combining the relative efficacy estimates with the survival data from the anchor arm. Quality-adjusted life year （QALY） were used as the model outcome measure. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net monetary benefit （INMB） were calculated to assess the economic value of the three treatment regimens. The willingness-to-pay （WTP） threshold was set at twice the 2025 per capita gross domestic product of China， corresponding to 199 330 yuan/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis， probabilistic sensitivity analysis， and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the base-case results. RESULTS In the base-case analysis， compared with ibrutinib group， both acalabrutinib group and zanubrutinib group demonstrated cost-saving and health-improving advantages. The INMBs were 149 361.37 yuan for acalabrutinib group and 194 783.94 yuan for zanubrutinib group， indicating that both strategies were dominant over ibrutinib. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that drug prices， hazard ratios between treatment strategies， and utility values were the major factors influencing the results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that when the WTP threshold was below 450 000 yuan/QALY， acalabrutinib group and zanubrutinib group regimens consistently had higher probabilities of being cost-effective than ibrutinib group. Scenario analyses showed that acalabrutinib group and zanubrutinib group remained cost-effective compared with ibrutinib group under alternative assumptions， including different anchor arms， high-risk patient cohorts， and an extended 20-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS Compared with ibrutinib， zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib can provide greater economic value as first-line treatments for CLL， with zanubrutinib demonstrating a more pronounced cost-effectiveness advantage.

Contralateral radiculopathy, a postoperative complication after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, refers to postoperative numbness, pain and other neurological symptoms of the lower limb on the side opposite to the symptomatic or the surgical decompression side. Its main causes include excessive restoration of lordosis, intervertebral space tilt caused by improper cage position, poor screw position, new protrusion of nucleus pulposus or bone graft, and hematoma. At present, attention to this complication is gradually increasing. This review summarizes its risk factors from the recent related reports of the condition and puts forward preventive measures in order to promote the preventive awareness of this complication.

BACKGROUND:Facet joint osteoarthritis is acknowledged as a significant contributor to lower back pain in the geriatric population.The advent of an innovative spinal facet joint fusion device presents a therapeutic option for intervening during the initial stages of facet joint osteoarthritis,and significantly reduces the incidence of a series of complications caused by poor early conservative treatment and late surgical treatment.However,its effect on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine is unknown.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the biomechanical disparities between the novel lumbar zygapophyseal joint fusion device and traditional fusion devices.METHODS:A comprehensive three-dimensional finite element model of the L3-S1 lumbar spine was established and validated.Based on this intact model,three groups of surgical models were constructed:a bilateral pedicle screw fixation model,a bilateral novel facet joint fusion fixation model,and a bilateral facet screw fixation model,with the surgical segment designated as L4-5.Under a load of 500 N,a torque of 7.5 Nm was applied to all lumbar models to calculate the range of motion,displacement values,and intervertebral disc stress values at the L4-5 segment;stress values at the L3-4 and L5-S1 segments were also measured.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Compared with the intact model,the range of motion at the L4-5 segment was reduced in all surgical models.(2)The novel device exhibited the smallest range of motion at the L4-5 segment under left and right rotational conditions;the greatest range of motion at the L4-5 segment under extension conditions;and a greater range of motion under other conditions than the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(3)The novel device demonstrated the smallest displacement values at the L4-5 segment under left and right rotational conditions;under other conditions,the displacement values at the L4-5 segment were greater than those in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(4)In terms of stress distribution at the L4-5 segment,the novel device consistently exhibited the smallest values across all conditions.(5)For the L3-4 segment,the novel device showed the greatest stress values under extension and left and right rotational conditions,while under other conditions,the values were lower than those in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(6)Compared with pedicle screw fixation,the novel device produced smaller stress values at the L5-S1 segment.(7)This study indicates that,compared with pedicle screw fixation,the novel device impacts the biomechanics of the lumbar spine by fusing the facet joints.It provides stability while preserving the range of motion at the surgical segment and reduces stress on the intervertebral discs of the surgical and adjacent segments,thereby potentially delaying disc degeneration.This suggests that the novel device can achieve biomechanical effects similar to those of pedicle screw fixation in theory.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the regulatory role of the NLRP3 signaling pathway in hepatocyte pyroptosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) under hypoxia. METHODS: Twenty-four male C57BL/6 mice were randomized equally into hypoxic control (A), hypoxic NASH model (B), hypoxic NASH+NLRP3 inhibitor (C), and hypoxic NASH+caspase-1 inhibitor (D) groups. In groups B-D, the mice were fed a methionine choline-deficient (MCD) diet under hypoxic conditions (to simulate a 5000 m altitude) for 6 weeks; the mice in groups C and D received intraperitoneal injections of the respective inhibitors every other day. RESULTS: Compared with those in group A, the mice in group B showed significantly elevated serum levels of FBG, TC, TG, ALT and AST, increased liver lipid content, inflammatory cell infiltration and collagen fiber deposition, and enhanced hepatic expressions of NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β and GSDMD proteins, with obvious swelling, cristae breakage, vacuolization, and outer membrane disruption of the mitochondria, ribosome loss in the cytoplasm, destruction of the nuclear membrane, and pathological changes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Treatment with NLRP3 inhibitor and caspase-1 inhibitor both significantly lowered serum levels of TC, TG, ALT and AST (but without significantly affecting FBG) in the mouse models, and reduced liver lipid content, inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen deposition, and expression levels of NLRP3, caspase-1, GSDMD and IL-1β. The treatments also significantly improved pathological changes in the mitochondria, ribosomes and endoplasmic reticulum in liver tissues of the mice. CONCLUSIONS NLRP3 signaling pathway plays a key role in promoting hepatocyte pyroptosis in NASH mice under hypoxic condition, and inhibiting this pathway can effectively reduce liver inflammation, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for NASH treatment.
Animals ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/metabolism* ; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism* ; Pyroptosis ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Male ; Hepatocytes/pathology* ; Signal Transduction ; Mice ; Hypoxia/metabolism* ; Caspase 1/metabolism* ; Interleukin-1beta/metabolism* ; Liver/metabolism*

BACKGROUND:Facet joint osteoarthritis is acknowledged as a significant contributor to lower back pain in the geriatric population.The advent of an innovative spinal facet joint fusion device presents a therapeutic option for intervening during the initial stages of facet joint osteoarthritis,and significantly reduces the incidence of a series of complications caused by poor early conservative treatment and late surgical treatment.However,its effect on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine is unknown.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the biomechanical disparities between the novel lumbar zygapophyseal joint fusion device and traditional fusion devices.METHODS:A comprehensive three-dimensional finite element model of the L3-S1 lumbar spine was established and validated.Based on this intact model,three groups of surgical models were constructed:a bilateral pedicle screw fixation model,a bilateral novel facet joint fusion fixation model,and a bilateral facet screw fixation model,with the surgical segment designated as L4-5.Under a load of 500 N,a torque of 7.5 Nm was applied to all lumbar models to calculate the range of motion,displacement values,and intervertebral disc stress values at the L4-5 segment;stress values at the L3-4 and L5-S1 segments were also measured.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Compared with the intact model,the range of motion at the L4-5 segment was reduced in all surgical models.(2)The novel device exhibited the smallest range of motion at the L4-5 segment under left and right rotational conditions;the greatest range of motion at the L4-5 segment under extension conditions;and a greater range of motion under other conditions than the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(3)The novel device demonstrated the smallest displacement values at the L4-5 segment under left and right rotational conditions;under other conditions,the displacement values at the L4-5 segment were greater than those in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(4)In terms of stress distribution at the L4-5 segment,the novel device consistently exhibited the smallest values across all conditions.(5)For the L3-4 segment,the novel device showed the greatest stress values under extension and left and right rotational conditions,while under other conditions,the values were lower than those in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model.(6)Compared with pedicle screw fixation,the novel device produced smaller stress values at the L5-S1 segment.(7)This study indicates that,compared with pedicle screw fixation,the novel device impacts the biomechanics of the lumbar spine by fusing the facet joints.It provides stability while preserving the range of motion at the surgical segment and reduces stress on the intervertebral discs of the surgical and adjacent segments,thereby potentially delaying disc degeneration.This suggests that the novel device can achieve biomechanical effects similar to those of pedicle screw fixation in theory.

Contralateral radiculopathy, a postoperative complication after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, refers to postoperative numbness, pain and other neurological symptoms of the lower limb on the side opposite to the symptomatic or the surgical decompression side. Its main causes include excessive restoration of lordosis, intervertebral space tilt caused by improper cage position, poor screw position, new protrusion of nucleus pulposus or bone graft, and hematoma. At present, attention to this complication is gradually increasing. This review summarizes its risk factors from the recent related reports of the condition and puts forward preventive measures in order to promote the preventive awareness of this complication.

Objective To investigate the international occupational classification of rehabilitation-therapy professionals,and analyze the core competencies,to improve the occupational system of rehabilitation-therapy professionals in China. Methods According to Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use that prepared by the Statistics Division of the United Nations and Human Development Index of each country or area,the occupational classification of rehabil-itation-therapy professionals in the International Labour Organization(ILO)and 17 typical countries or areas was compared,and rehabilitation competency framework(RCF)was used to analyze the core competencies. Results The occupational classification or similar documents of ILO and 15 countries or areas were obtained.Except China categorizing rehabilitation-therapy professionals as technicians,all the documents set detailed occupations of rehabilitation-therapy professionals such as physical therapist and speech therapist as formal full-time occupa-tion;and ILO and 14 countries or areas defined these detailed occupations as professional occupation.The core competencies of technicians only involved a very small number of competencies and activities in RCF,while the core competencies of detailed occupations of rehabilitation-therapy professionals covered the vast majority of competencies and activities in RCF.There were differences in RCF competencies and activities involved in the core competencies of detailed occupations of rehabilitation-therapy professionals. Conclusion The core competencies are different between rehabilitation-therapy professionals and technicians,and among different detailed occupations of rehabilitation-therapy professionals.It is important for China to establish the detailed occupations of rehabilitation-therapy professionals as formal full-time occupation.The education re-lated to therapy and rehabilitation in China is gradually aligning with international standards,legislation on occu-pational qualification admission for rehabilitation-therapy professionals should be carried out,and make the reha-bilitation-therapy professionals to be professional occupation.

OBJECTIVE To analyze the cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib， palbociclib and ribociclib combined with aromatase inhibitors （AI） in first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive （HR+） advanced breast cancer from the perspective of Chinese medical system. METHODS The 20-year disease course of the patients was simulated by the partitioned survival model， and the simulation period was determined to be 4 weeks， the model output was the total cost and quality-adjusted life year （QALY）， the cost and effect were discounted at a discount rate of 5%. A network meta-analysis was constructed by systematically searching relevant clinical trials to obtain the efficacy parameters of abemaciclib， palbociclib and ribociclib combined with AI. Survival fitting and extrapolation were performed based on the survival curve of the placebo group in MONALEESA-2 trial. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER） and incremental net monetary benefit （INMB）， with a willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times China’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP） in 2023； one-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were used to detect the influence of parameters on the results and the robustness of the incremental analysis results. RESULTS In the 20-year simulation， compared with palbociclib+AI scheme， the ICER of ribociclib+AI scheme was 58 558.38 yuan/QALY and the INMB was 62 988.20 yuan. Compared with ribociclib+AI scheme， the ICER of abemaciclib+AI scheme was 264 928.34 yuan/QALY and the INMB was 344.84 yuan. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the incremental analysis results of abemaciclib+AI scheme compared to ribociclib+AI scheme were not robust. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed that the probability of ribociclib+AI scheme becoming the most economical was the highest when the threshold was 1-3 times China’s per capita GDP in 2023. CONCLUSIONS Ribociclib+AI scheme is more likely to be the most economical first-line treatment than abemaciclib+AI scheme and palbociclib+AI scheme in Chinese patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer when threshold is 1-3 times China’s per capita GDP in 2023.

Dependovirus/genetics* ; Microglia ; Cells, Cultured ; Transduction, Genetic

Objective:To compare the clinical effects between Dynesys dynamic stabilization with microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) treatment for the degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elder, and to evaluate clinical advantages of Dynesys with MED according to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).Methods:All of 79 cases (male 31, female 48) who suffered from the degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were include mean age 67.32±5.88 years (from 60 to 81 years) during January 2012 to December 2017. Thirty-nine patients received Dynesys dynamic stabilization with MED (Dynesys group) and 40 cases undergone PLIF (fusion group). The operative time, blood loss, drainage, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared between the two groups. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess efficacy. The range of motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine and the adjacent segment by dynamic radiographs between two groups were reviewed to evaluate radiological results.Results:The fusion group was larger than Dynesys group in operation time (271.00±57.19 min vs. 193.85±32.17 min), blood loss (458.25±136.85 ml vs. 316.41±87.64 ml), drainage (143.12±47.46 ml vs. 101.67±31.23 ml) and length of hospital stay (15.70±3.01 d vs. 13.38±2.72 d) with statistics differences ( P<0.05). There was a significant difference in VAS and ODI between the two groups at the final follow-up, and Dynesys group was superior to the fusion group (VAS: 1.51±1.21 vs. 2.40±1.48, t=2.910, P=0.005; ODI: 11.90%±6.15% vs. 17.73%±6.85%, t=3.974, P<0.001). The lumbar ROM of Dynesys group increased comparing with the fusion group at post-operation one year (19.21°±6.08° vs. 14.08°±5.80°, t=0.425, P<0.001) and final follow-up (20.56°±6.37° vs. 16.33°±6.94°, t=2.828, P=0.006). ROM of the adjacent segment increased in fusion group at final follow-up (7.45°±2.45°) compared to pre-operation (4.68°±1.98°) and post-operation one year (4.83±1.43°) with significant difference ( F=24.437, P<0.001). The rate of epidural damage, delayed union, surface infection, internal fixation loose, thrombus, pulmonary infection, bedsore, reoperation of the fusion group were all higher than Dynesys group. Conclusion:The Dynesys with MED demonstrated better clinical and radiological results than fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. As a method of safety and efficiency, the Dynesys and MED can speed up postoperative recovery of elderly patients in line with ERAS.