Objective:To develop accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner specialized training of hospice care.Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty nine experts in fields of general practice and hospice care were invited for two rounds of Delphi consultation from April 2022 to August 2022. Based on the consultation results, the accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner training bases of hospice care specialty was preliminarily developed.Results:The mean age of the consulting experts was (52.9±8.9) years with a mean working year of (17.0±7.2), and 69.0% (20/29) of them held senior professional titles. In the two rounds of consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.765 and 0.813, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W for the importance of all indicators was 0.112 and 0.196, respectively. The expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, a set of clinical base faculty standards for general specialty training was developed, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, scientific research ability, with the weight coefficients of 0.253, 0.255, 0.254 and 0.241, respectively. Conclusion:The standards for clinical teaching faculty in general practitioner specialty training base of hospice care has been established in this study, which is conducive to the comprehensive quality evaluation for training faculty.

Objective:To formulate a community teacher standard for the training of general practitioner program (direction in hospice care).Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty-nine experts in general practice and hospice care from various teaching hospitals and community health service centers were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation from April to August 2022. Based on the results of the consultation, a standard for community faculty training in comprehensive care and end-of-life care for general practitioners was formulated, and the weight coefficients of the indicators were calculated.Results:Of the 29 experts, 11 (37.9%) were male, their age was (52.9±8.9) years, and their working life was (17.0±7.2) years. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.789 and 0.851, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.124 and 0.131, respectively ( χ2=123.01, 131.71, P<0.05). Finally, a set of community-based teacher standard for general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators. The four first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, and scientific research ability, all with the weight coefficients of 0.254, 0.254, 0.252 and 0.240, respectively. Conclusion:The standard of teachers in the community base of general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) established in this study is more scientific, which is conducive to the comprehensive evaluation of teachers in the community training base.

Objective:To formulate a community teacher standard for the training of general practitioner program (direction in hospice care).Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty-nine experts in general practice and hospice care from various teaching hospitals and community health service centers were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation from April to August 2022. Based on the results of the consultation, a standard for community faculty training in comprehensive care and end-of-life care for general practitioners was formulated, and the weight coefficients of the indicators were calculated.Results:Of the 29 experts, 11 (37.9%) were male, their age was (52.9±8.9) years, and their working life was (17.0±7.2) years. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.789 and 0.851, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.124 and 0.131, respectively ( χ2=123.01, 131.71, P<0.05). Finally, a set of community-based teacher standard for general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators. The four first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, and scientific research ability, all with the weight coefficients of 0.254, 0.254, 0.252 and 0.240, respectively. Conclusion:The standard of teachers in the community base of general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) established in this study is more scientific, which is conducive to the comprehensive evaluation of teachers in the community training base.

Objective:To develop accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner specialized training of hospice care.Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty nine experts in fields of general practice and hospice care were invited for two rounds of Delphi consultation from April 2022 to August 2022. Based on the consultation results, the accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner training bases of hospice care specialty was preliminarily developed.Results:The mean age of the consulting experts was (52.9±8.9) years with a mean working year of (17.0±7.2), and 69.0% (20/29) of them held senior professional titles. In the two rounds of consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.765 and 0.813, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W for the importance of all indicators was 0.112 and 0.196, respectively. The expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, a set of clinical base faculty standards for general specialty training was developed, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, scientific research ability, with the weight coefficients of 0.253, 0.255, 0.254 and 0.241, respectively. Conclusion:The standards for clinical teaching faculty in general practitioner specialty training base of hospice care has been established in this study, which is conducive to the comprehensive quality evaluation for training faculty.

Objective:To develop standards of hospice care specialized clinical training base for general practitioners.Methods:Twenty nine experts in fields of general practice and hospice care were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi expert consultation from April 2022 to August 2022. Based the results of Delphi consultations the standards of clinical training base for general practitioner hospice care specialized training were developed through data analysis, synthesis and process.Results:The age of 29 consulting experts was (52.9±8.9) years old, and their working years were (17.0±7.2) years, 69.0% (20/29) of them had senior professional titles. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.791 and 0.830, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.177 and 0.296, respectively ( χ2=133.54 , 223.46; P<0.01). Finally, a set of clinical base standards for general practitioner hospice care specialized training was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 23 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic conditions, teaching conditions, teacher conditions and teaching management, with the weight coefficients of 0.250, 0.250, 0.251 and 0.253, respectively. Conclusions:The clinical training base standards of hospice care specialized training for general practitioners have been established in this study, which will be helpful in selecting appropriate hospitals as the specialized clinical training base for general practitioners.

Objective:To develop standards of hospice care community training base for general practitioners.Methods:Twenty-nine experts in general practice and hospice care from different teaching hospitals and community health service centers were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation from April to August 2022. Based on the consultations a set of standards of hospice care community training base was developed.Results:The age of experts was 38-75 (52.9±8.9) years, and their working years were 5-32 (17.0±7.2)years. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.791 and 0.830, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.137 and 0.289, respectively ( χ2=114.83, 226.94; P<0.05). A set of hospice care community training base standards for general practitioner was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 27 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic conditions, teaching conditions, teacher conditions and teaching management, with the weight coefficients of 0.247, 0.248, 0.250 and 0.252, respectively. Conclusion:The standards developed in this study may be used for constructing and evaluating hospice care community training base for general practitioners.

One hundred and fifty diabetic patients,who received management by community family doctors and hospital consortium (1+1+1) team for at least 1 year,were enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.After that they continued to receive the management for 1 more year by the team which were trained with TeamSTEPPS (team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety).The management effect before and after TeamSTEPPS training was compared.After the TeamSTEPPS training,the team management ability was improved,so that the compliance of diabetic patients with medical advice,regular examination of blood glucose,regular follow-up assessment,health education,regular exercise and diet control were all better than before,and the differences were statistically significant (all P＜0.01).Fasting blood glucose,postprandial 2 h-blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin and LDL-C levels were all lower than before,and the achieved rate of the above indicators were also increased (P＜0.05).It is suggested that application of TeamSTEPPS in team training can effectively enhance the management ability for chronic disease of family doctors and improve compliance and clinical indicators of patients with diabetes under management.

Objective To evaluate the application of TeamSTEPPS in training of community osteoporosis management team .Methods The TeamSTEPPS was applied for training of osteoporosis management team, and 1 513 residents aged ≥45 year were screened for osteoporosis in Kangjian community from January 2014 to March 2017.The identified patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis were intervened for one year.Cognitive level of the risk factors and symptoms associated with osteoporosis were assessed by questionnaires before and after the intervention .The bone density was examined at baseline and 6 months, 12 months after intervention.The effect of intervention was evaluated .Results A total of 467 patients (30.87%) with osteopenia and 476 patients (31.46%) with osteoporosis were detected .The cognitive levels of osteoporosis risk factors , including low calcium, vitamin D deficiency, lack of exercise, low weight, women menopause, matrilineal family history, smoking, excessive alcohol drinking and coffee drinking, were higher than those before intervention ( χ2＝62.909,78.742,59.974,50.478,29.512, 34.699,6.500,15.779,6.089,all P＜0.05).The awareness rates of symptoms , including lower back pain or body bone pain, shorter height and hunchback , low energy or nonviolent fracture , were also increased (χ2＝59.942,76.220,16.856,all P＜0.01).After intervention, the bone mineral density levels were increased compared to those before intervention (F＝530.28, P＜0.01 for osteopenia group; F＝339.51, P＜0.01 for osteoporosis group ); meanwhile, the differences were also significant between 6 months, 12 months after intervention and before intervention , between 12 months and 6 months after intervention (t＝-0.452,-0.968,-0.516,all P＜0.01 for osteopenia group; t＝-0.530,-1.045,-0.518, all P＜0.01 for osteoporosis group ).Conclusion The community osteoporosis management team trained by TeamSTEPPS can effectively improve the management levels of osteoporosis among residents in the community.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms, and the related factors in family members of schizophrenic patients in a Shanghai community. Methods: From March to May 2017, the family members of 206 schizophrenic patients registered in Xuhui district Kangjian community of Shanghai were enrolled in this cross-sectional survey. The participants were evaluated with Patient Health Questionnaire Self-rating Depression Scale (PHQ-9) and the Anxiety Screening Scale (GAD-7). The factors related to depression and anxiety symptoms were analyzed. Results: The detection rates of depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms in the family members of schizophrenia patients were 40.3%(83/206) and 37.9%(78/206), respectively.Univariate analysis showed that the relationship with the patient, education levels were the influencing factors of depressive symptoms (χ²=17.045, 9.702; P<0.01); while age, relationship with the patient, education levels were factors related to the occurence of anxiety symptoms (χ²=11.862, 22.042, 15.060; P<0.01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the parents of patient was more prone to depressive symptoms than spouses (OR=2.861, P<0.01); higher education was more prone to be depressive than primary education (OR=10.071, P<0.01). Age group 18-40 years were more prone to anxiety than the age group ≥66 years (OR=0.060, P<0.05); sibling relationship is more prone to anxiety than spouse relationship (OR=10.018, P<0.01), followed by parental relationship (OR=7.467, P<0.01); higher education was more prone to anxiety than primary education (OR=5.119, P<0.05). Conclusions There is high prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms in family members of schizophrenic patients, which is related to the relationship with the patient, the education level of family members and other factors.

Objective To establish an animal model by placing one end of PICC in the hepatic portal vein of a beagle dog and leaving the other end out of its body.Methods Six Beagle dogs were given respiration anesthesia through orotracheal intubation.An incision was made through the right rectus abdominalis to locate the superior mesenteric vein (SMA) and the main hepatic portal vein.The left branch of SMA was separated and cut to put PICC into the main hepatic portal vein before being ligated and fixed.The other end of PICC was elicited through the right abdominal wall and passed beneath the skin to the back neck and fastened in case of movement.Results The anesthetic effect was good and all the operations were successful.The mean operation time was about an hour and the mean blood loss was about 15 ml.The incision healed 5-7 d after operation.Conclusion The establishment of the model can improve the effects of liver-targeting drugs,which can cut down the dosage,lower the cost of treatment and experiment and reduce the adverse effect of medicines.Through PICC,we can directly draw blood from the hepatic portal vein to measure the blood concentration before the first pass elimination.Then according to the concentration,we can calculate the absorption rate in the gastrointestinal tract,which can facilitate related experimental studies.