Naturally occurring compounds have widely been applied to treat diverse pharmacological effects, including asthma, allergic diseases, antioxidants, inflammation, antibiotics, and cancer. Recent research has revealed the essential role of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in regulating inflammatory responses at mucosal barriers and maintaining immune homeostasis. Asthma, inflammation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are allergic disorders in which TSLP plays a significant role. Although TSLP’s role in type 2 immune responses has undergone comprehensive investigation, its involvement in inflammatory diseases and cancer has also been found to be expanding. However, investigating how to block the TSLP pathway using natural products has been limited. This paper summarizes the roles of various medicinal plants and their chemical components that effectively inhibit the TSLP pathway. In addition, we also highlight the contributions of several plant-derived compounds to treat allergic diseases via targeting TSLP. This review intends to offer innovative concepts to scientists investigating the use of naturally produced compounds and extracts for the treatment of allergic illnesses.

Naturally occurring compounds have widely been applied to treat diverse pharmacological effects, including asthma, allergic diseases, antioxidants, inflammation, antibiotics, and cancer. Recent research has revealed the essential role of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in regulating inflammatory responses at mucosal barriers and maintaining immune homeostasis. Asthma, inflammation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are allergic disorders in which TSLP plays a significant role. Although TSLP’s role in type 2 immune responses has undergone comprehensive investigation, its involvement in inflammatory diseases and cancer has also been found to be expanding. However, investigating how to block the TSLP pathway using natural products has been limited. This paper summarizes the roles of various medicinal plants and their chemical components that effectively inhibit the TSLP pathway. In addition, we also highlight the contributions of several plant-derived compounds to treat allergic diseases via targeting TSLP. This review intends to offer innovative concepts to scientists investigating the use of naturally produced compounds and extracts for the treatment of allergic illnesses.

Naturally occurring compounds have widely been applied to treat diverse pharmacological effects, including asthma, allergic diseases, antioxidants, inflammation, antibiotics, and cancer. Recent research has revealed the essential role of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in regulating inflammatory responses at mucosal barriers and maintaining immune homeostasis. Asthma, inflammation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are allergic disorders in which TSLP plays a significant role. Although TSLP’s role in type 2 immune responses has undergone comprehensive investigation, its involvement in inflammatory diseases and cancer has also been found to be expanding. However, investigating how to block the TSLP pathway using natural products has been limited. This paper summarizes the roles of various medicinal plants and their chemical components that effectively inhibit the TSLP pathway. In addition, we also highlight the contributions of several plant-derived compounds to treat allergic diseases via targeting TSLP. This review intends to offer innovative concepts to scientists investigating the use of naturally produced compounds and extracts for the treatment of allergic illnesses.

Background: An increased incidence of hair loss disorders has been noted among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and individuals vaccinated against COVID-19. However, research involving large populations on this topic is lacking. Objective: To investigate the risks associated with developing hair loss disorders in patients with COVID-19 and individuals vaccinated against COVID-19. Methods: This nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and healthy individuals without a history of COVID-19 infection registered in the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. COVID-19 infection and vaccine databases were integrated using this NHIS database. The odds ratios of hair loss disorders were compared using multivariate logistic regression models. Results: COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of total alopecia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002–1.156), although this association was not significant after propensity score matching. No significant associations were found between COVID-19 infection and alopecia areata or telogen effluvium. However, COVID-19 vaccination was positively correlated with total alopecia (aOR, 1.266; 95% CI, 1.191–1.346), alopecia areata (aOR, 1.243; 95% CI, 1.154–1.339), and telogen effluvium (aOR, 1.495; 95% CI, 1.133–1.974). Conclusion COVID-19 vaccination was positively correlated with hair loss disorders but not COVID-19 infection. However, given the advantages of vaccines in reducing COVID-19 mortality and morbidity, alopecia may be relatively reversible and less severe. Physicians need to understand the benefits and possible side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Objective: This was a retrospective investigation conducted to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: Data were collected over one year for the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 (control) groups, from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, when COVID-19 was prevalent in Korea, and from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019, before the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. Adult patients diagnosed with acute cerebral infarction at three emergency medical centers during the study period were included. COVID-19-positive patients (i.e., those with COVID-19 symptoms but those who tested positive) were excluded from this study to ensure only the evaluation of delays in stroke treatment due to the pandemic. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, of the total of 82,558 patients who visited the emergency centers, 710 were diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The study observed that the pandemic caused process delays for these patients, resulting in longer wait times for brain CT scans (P=0.010, P<0.001) and emergency room stays (P=0.0055, P<0.001) during the COVID-19 period. However, the length of time for administration of tissue plasminogen activator remained relatively constant. Notably, the 28-day mortality rate was considerably higher for patients with COVID-19-related symptoms during the pandemic (13.6% vs 3.1%; P=0.006). A cumulative risk analysis revealed an increased mortality risk for patients with COVID-19 related symptoms (P=0.005). Conclusion This study showed the need to improve emergency care procedures during pandemics to ensure prompt treatment of ischemic stroke. Preparation and resource allocation for ischemic stroke patients with COVID-19 symptoms are crucial.

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have greatly improved survival in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, their effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME) are unknown. We assessed the changes induced by neoadjuvant erlotinib therapy (NE) in the TME of operable EGFRm NSCLC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-arm phase II trial for neoadjuvant/adjuvant erlotinib therapy in patients with stage II/IIIA EGFRm NSCLC (EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations). Patients received up to 2 cycles of NE (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks, followed by surgery and adjuvant erlotinib or vinorelbine plus cisplatin therapy depending on observed NE response. TME changes were assessed based on gene expression analysis and mutation profiling. Results: A total of 26 patients were enrolled; the median age was 61, 69% were female, 88% were stage IIIA, and 62% had L858R mutation. Among 25 patients who received NE, the objective response rate was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.4 to 85.7). The median disease-free and overall survival (OS) were 17.9 (95% CI, 10.5 to 25.4) and 84.7 months (95% CI, 49.7 to 119.8), respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis in resected tissues revealed upregulation of interleukin, complement, cytokine, transforming growth factor β, and hedgehog pathways. Patients with upregulated pathogen defense, interleukins, and T-cell function pathways at baseline exhibited partial response to NE and longer OS. Patients with upregulated cell cycle pathways at baseline exhibited stable/progressive disease after NE and shorter OS. Conclusion NE modulated the TME in EGFRm NSCLC. Upregulation of immune-related pathways was associated with better outcomes.

Purpose: This subgroup analysis of the Korean subset of patients in the phase 3 LASER301 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to lazertinib (240 mg/day) or gefitinib (250 mg/day). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In total, 172 Korean patients were enrolled (lazertinib, n=87; gefitinib, n=85). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. One-third of patients had brain metastases (BM) at baseline. Median PFS was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7 to 26.1) for lazertinib and 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.3) for gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.60). This was supported by PFS analysis based on blinded independent central review. Significant PFS benefit with lazertinib was consistently observed across predefined subgroups, including patients with BM (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.53) and those with L858R mutations (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63). Lazertinib safety data were consistent with its previously reported safety profile. Common adverse events (AEs) in both groups included rash, pruritus, and diarrhoea. Numerically fewer severe AEs and severe treatment–related AEs occurred with lazertinib than gefitinib. Conclusion Consistent with results for the overall LASER301 population, this analysis showed significant PFS benefit with lazertinib versus gefitinib with comparable safety in Korean patients with untreated EGFRm NSCLC, supporting lazertinib as a new potential treatment option for this patient population.

Objective: This was a retrospective investigation conducted to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: Data were collected over one year for the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 (control) groups, from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, when COVID-19 was prevalent in Korea, and from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019, before the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. Adult patients diagnosed with acute cerebral infarction at three emergency medical centers during the study period were included. COVID-19-positive patients (i.e., those with COVID-19 symptoms but those who tested positive) were excluded from this study to ensure only the evaluation of delays in stroke treatment due to the pandemic. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, of the total of 82,558 patients who visited the emergency centers, 710 were diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The study observed that the pandemic caused process delays for these patients, resulting in longer wait times for brain CT scans (P=0.010, P<0.001) and emergency room stays (P=0.0055, P<0.001) during the COVID-19 period. However, the length of time for administration of tissue plasminogen activator remained relatively constant. Notably, the 28-day mortality rate was considerably higher for patients with COVID-19-related symptoms during the pandemic (13.6% vs 3.1%; P=0.006). A cumulative risk analysis revealed an increased mortality risk for patients with COVID-19 related symptoms (P=0.005). Conclusion This study showed the need to improve emergency care procedures during pandemics to ensure prompt treatment of ischemic stroke. Preparation and resource allocation for ischemic stroke patients with COVID-19 symptoms are crucial.

Objective: This was a retrospective investigation conducted to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: Data were collected over one year for the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 (control) groups, from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, when COVID-19 was prevalent in Korea, and from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019, before the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. Adult patients diagnosed with acute cerebral infarction at three emergency medical centers during the study period were included. COVID-19-positive patients (i.e., those with COVID-19 symptoms but those who tested positive) were excluded from this study to ensure only the evaluation of delays in stroke treatment due to the pandemic. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, of the total of 82,558 patients who visited the emergency centers, 710 were diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The study observed that the pandemic caused process delays for these patients, resulting in longer wait times for brain CT scans (P=0.010, P<0.001) and emergency room stays (P=0.0055, P<0.001) during the COVID-19 period. However, the length of time for administration of tissue plasminogen activator remained relatively constant. Notably, the 28-day mortality rate was considerably higher for patients with COVID-19-related symptoms during the pandemic (13.6% vs 3.1%; P=0.006). A cumulative risk analysis revealed an increased mortality risk for patients with COVID-19 related symptoms (P=0.005). Conclusion This study showed the need to improve emergency care procedures during pandemics to ensure prompt treatment of ischemic stroke. Preparation and resource allocation for ischemic stroke patients with COVID-19 symptoms are crucial.

Background: The need for an objective method for measuring skin hydration levels is becoming increasingly important. Various devices with different measuring principles for assessing skin hydration have been developed and are widely used. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility and correlation between clinical evaluation and skin hydration measurement devices that are the most widely used in the field. Methods: A prospective comparative clinical trial was conducted on 184 healthy volunteers. Skin hydration levels were measured using the Corneometer (CM820) and hydration probe (HP: DermaLab Combo) at 3 points: the ventral forearm, the dorsal forearm, and the shin. We used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate the reproducibility and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) to evaluate the correlation of each measurement. Simple linear regression was used to analyze the Corneometer and HP skin hydration value changes according to changes in xerosis severity scale (XSS) values, which were evaluated by clinicians. Results: Both the Corneometer and HP showed significant, excellent reproducibility (ICC for Corneometer: 0.954–0.971, ICC for HP: 0.980–0.986) and significant high positive correlations (PCC: 0.708–0.737) regardless of the measurement site. Both devices showed negative regression coefficients in all measurement sites in XSS analysis, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusion The Corneometer and HP were both accurate and objective skin hydration measuring devices, regardless of the measurement site. Using reliable and objective devices such as the Corneometer or HP can aid in understanding an individual’s skin condition and making more informed decisions for skin care.