1.Pancreatic Cancer Detection and Differentiation from Chronic Pancreatitis: Potential Biomarkers Identified Through a High-throughput Multiplex Proteomic Assay and Machine Learning-based Analysis
Young-gon KIM ; Sang-Mi KIM ; Soo-Youn LEE
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2025;45(4):399-409
Background:
Pancreatic cancer (PC)-screening methods have limited accuracy despite their high clinical demand. Differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP) poses another challenge for PC diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to identify blood protein biomarkers for PC diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CP using high-throughput multiplex proteomic analysis.
Methods:
Two independent cohorts (N = 88 and 80) were included, and residual serum samples were collected from all individuals (N = 168). Each cohort consisted of four groups: healthy (H) individuals and those with CP, stage I/II PC (PC1), or stage III/IV PC (PC2). Protein expression in the first cohort was quantified using the Olink Immuno-Oncology and Oncology 3 proximity extension assay (PEA) panels and was analyzed using machine-learning (ML)-based analyses. Samples in the second cohort were utilized to verify candidate biomarkers in immunoassays.
Results:
Both the PEA and immunoassay results confirmed that previously recognized biomarkers, such as the mucin-16 and interleukin-6 proteins, were more highly expressed in the PC (PC1 and PC2) groups than in the non-PC (CP and H) groups. Several novel biomarkers for PC diagnosis were identified via ML-based feature extraction, including C1QA and CDHR2, whereas pro-neuropeptide Y (NPY) appeared to be a promising biomarker for the differential diagnosis of CP. Applying XGBoost classification incorporating the selected features resulted in an area under the curve of 0.92 (0.85–0.98) for differentiating the PC group from the CP and H groups.
Conclusions
Promising blood biomarkers for PC diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CP were identified using a PEA platform and ML techniques.
2.Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application:2024 Updated Guidelines by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
John Hoon RIM ; Young-gon KIM ; Sollip KIM ; Rihwa CHOI ; Jee-Soo LEE ; Seungman PARK ; Woochang LEE ; Eun Young SONG ; Soo-Youn LEE ; Sail CHUN ;
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2025;45(2):121-132
In the era of precision medicine, pharmacogenetics has substantial potential for addressing inter-individual variability in drug responses. Although pharmacogenetics has been a research focus for many years, resulting in the establishment of several formal guidelines, its clinical implementation remains limited to several gene–drug combinations in most countries, including Korea. The main causes of delayed implementation are technical challenges in genotyping and knowledge gaps among healthcare providers; therefore, clinical laboratories play a critical role in the timely implementation of pharmacogenetics. This paper presents an update of the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application guidelines issued by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and aims to provide the necessary information for clinical laboratories planning to implement or expand their pharmacogenetic testing. Current knowledge regarding nomenclature, gene–drug relationships, genotyping technologies, testing strategies, methods for clinically relevant information delivery, QC, and reimbursements has been curated and described in this guideline.
3.Erratum: Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Nationwide Survey on Surgically Treated Gastric Cancers in 2023
Dong Jin KIM ; Jeong Ho SONG ; Ji-Hyeon PARK ; Sojung KIM ; Sin Hye PARK ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Kyunghye BANG ; Chung-sik GONG ; Sung Eun OH ; Yoo Min KIM ; Young Suk PARK ; Jeesun KIM ; Ji Eun JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Bang Wool EOM ; Ki Bum PARK ; Jae Hun CHUNG ; Sang-Il LEE ; Young-Gil SON ; Dae Hoon KIM ; Sang Hyuk SEO ; Sejin LEE ; Won Jun SEO ; Dong Jin PARK ; Yoonhong KIM ; Jin-Jo KIM ; Ki Bum PARK ; In CHO ; Hye Seong AHN ; Sung Jin OH ; Ju-Hee LEE ; Hayemin LEE ; Seong Chan GONG ; Changin CHOI ; Ji-Ho PARK ; Eun Young KIM ; Chang Min LEE ; Jong Hyuk YUN ; Seung Jong OH ; Eunju LEE ; Seong-A JEONG ; Jung-Min BAE ; Jae-Seok MIN ; Hyun-dong CHAE ; Sung Gon KIM ; Daegeun PARK ; Dong Baek KANG ; Hogoon KIM ; Seung Soo LEE ; Sung Il CHOI ; Seong Ho HWANG ; Su-Mi KIM ; Moon Soo LEE ; Sang Hyun KIM ; Sang-Ho JEONG ; Yusung YANG ; Yonghae BAIK ; Sang Soo EOM ; Inho JEONG ; Yoon Ju JUNG ; Jong-Min PARK ; Jin Won LEE ; Jungjai PARK ; Ki Han KIM ; Kyung-Goo LEE ; Jeongyeon LEE ; Seongil OH ; Ji Hun PARK ; Jong Won KIM ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):400-402
4.Korean Gastric Cancer AssociationLed Nationwide Survey on Surgically Treated Gastric Cancers in 2023
Dong Jin KIM ; Jeong Ho SONG ; Ji-Hyeon PARK ; Sojung KIM ; Sin Hye PARK ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Kyunghye BANG ; Chung-sik GONG ; Sung Eun OH ; Yoo Min KIM ; Young Suk PARK ; Jeesun KIM ; Ji Eun JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Bang Wool EOM ; Ki Bum PARK ; Jae Hun CHUNG ; Sang-Il LEE ; Young-Gil SON ; Dae Hoon KIM ; Sang Hyuk SEO ; Sejin LEE ; Won Jun SEO ; Dong Jin PARK ; Yoonhong KIM ; Jin-Jo KIM ; Ki Bum PARK ; In CHO ; Hye Seong AHN ; Sung Jin OH ; Ju-Hee LEE ; Hayemin LEE ; Seong Chan GONG ; Changin CHOI ; Ji-Ho PARK ; Eun Young KIM ; Chang Min LEE ; Jong Hyuk YUN ; Seung Jong OH ; Eunju LEE ; Seong-A JEONG ; Jung-Min BAE ; Jae-Seok MIN ; Hyun-dong CHAE ; Sung Gon KIM ; Daegeun PARK ; Dong Baek KANG ; Hogoon KIM ; Seung Soo LEE ; Sung Il CHOI ; Seong Ho HWANG ; Su-Mi KIM ; Moon Soo LEE ; Sang Hyun KIM ; Sang-Ho JEONG ; Yusung YANG ; Yonghae BAIK ; Sang Soo EOM ; Inho JEONG ; Yoon Ju JUNG ; Jong-Min PARK ; Jin Won LEE ; Jungjai PARK ; Ki Han KIM ; Kyung-Goo LEE ; Jeongyeon LEE ; Seongil OH ; Ji Hun PARK ; Jong Won KIM ; The Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(1):115-132
Purpose:
Since 1995, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA) has been periodically conducting nationwide surveys on patients with surgically treated gastric cancer. This study details the results of the survey conducted in 2023.
Materials and Methods:
The survey was conducted from March to December 2024 using a standardized case report form. Data were collected on 86 items, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and surgical outcomes. The results of the 2023 survey were compared with those of previous surveys.
Results:
Data from 12,751 cases were collected from 66 institutions. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and the proportion of patients aged ≥71 years increased from 9.1% in 1995 to 31.7% in 2023. The proportion of upper-third tumors slightly decreased to 16.8% compared to 20.9% in 2019. Early gastric cancer accounted for 63.1% of cases in 2023.Regarding operative procedures, a totally laparoscopic approach was most frequently applied (63.2%) in 2023, while robotic gastrectomy steadily increased to 9.5% from 2.1% in 2014.The most common anastomotic method was the Billroth II procedure (48.8%) after distal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction (51.9%) after proximal gastrectomy in 2023.However, the proportion of esophago-gastrostomy with anti-reflux procedures increased to 30.9%. The rates of post-operative mortality and overall complications were 1.0% and 15.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
The results of the 2023 nationwide survey demonstrate the current status of gastric cancer treatment in Korea. This information will provide a basis for future gastric cancer research.
5.Surgical Outcomes of Weight-Bearing Shoulders:Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Su Cheol KIM ; Hyun Gon KIM ; Young Girl RHEE ; Sung Min RHEE ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Du-Han KIM ; Hee Dong LEE ; Jae Chul YOO
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2025;17(3):438-452
Background:
This study aimed to report the short- and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in weight-bearing shoulders.
Methods:
This retrospective multicenter study included 19 cases of ARCR and 10 cases of RSA performed in weight-bearing shoulders from 2009 to 2021. In the ARCR group, postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the tendon integrity. In the RSA group, scapular notching, acromial fracture, and implant failure were assessed using plain radiographs, and complications were recorded. In both groups, preoperative and postoperative range of motion and functional scores were documented, along with subjective satisfaction and arm use for weight-bearing on the shoulders. For patients followed up for > 5 years, a midterm analysis was performed.
Results:
The ARCR group included 8 men and 11 women (average age, 58.8 ± 8.0 years). Initially, Patte types 1, 2, and 3 were noted in 9, 8, and 2 patients, respectively, and 4 patients exhibited full-thickness subscapularis tears. Four patients showed supraspinatus retear, and 2 patients showed subscapularis retear. Retear of any rotator cuff was observed in 5 patients (26.3%). Twelve patients were followed up for > 5 years; 11 (91.7%) used their operated arm for weight-bearing and 9 (75.0%) were satisfied. The RSA group included 5 men and 5 women (average age, 74.3 ± 7.9 years). Procedures included RSAs for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 6), osteoarthritis (n = 3), and fracture nonunion (n = 1). No cases of dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or disassociation were observed throughout the follow-up. However, 1 patient required implant removal due to infection, and 4 patients showed stage 1 scapular notching. Five patients were followed up for > 5 years, all of whom expressed satisfaction and used their operated arms for weight-bearing, despite mean forward flexion (107.5° ± 12.6°) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (61.5 ± 5.3) being less than reported patient acceptable symptomatic state (110° and 76, respectively).
Conclusions
Both ARCR and RSA showed promising outcomes in terms of weight-bearing on the operated arm and subjective satisfaction at short- and midterm follow-up. Therefore, neither of these surgeries should be considered contraindicated for patients with weight-bearing shoulder conditions.
6.Comparing 1-L and 2-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chang Kyo OH ; Sang Pyo LEE ; Jae Gon LEE ; Young Joo YANG ; Seung In SEO ; Chang Seok BANG ; Yu Jin KIM ; Woon Geon SHIN ; Jin Bae KIM ; Hyun Joo JANG ; Sea Hyub KAE ; Gwang Ho BAIK ; Hallym Gastrointestinal Study Group
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):87-94
Background/Aims:
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has become the standard for initial evaluation in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions. Although optimal visualization of the mucosa is important, patients experience difficulty in consuming a large volume of bowel preparation agents. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 1-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (AA) and 2-L PEG with AA.
Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority study, patients who received SBCE were randomly assigned to consume 1-L PEG with AA or 2-L PEG with AA for small bowel preparation. The primary outcome was adequate small bowel visibility quality (SBVQ). The secondary outcomes included diagnostic yield, cecal complete rate, and adverse events.
Results:
One hundred and forty patients were enrolled in this study, 70 patients per group. In the per-protocol analysis, there were no significant differences in the adequate SBVQ rate (94.0% vs 94.3%; risk difference, –0.3; 95% confidence interval, –8.1 to 7.6; p=1.000), diagnostic yield rate (49.3% vs 48.6%, p=0.936), or cecal complete rate (88.1% vs 92.9%, p=0.338) between the 1-L PEG with AA group and 2-L PEG with AA group. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.9% vs 11.9%, p=0.871).
Conclusions
One liter-PEG with AA is not inferior to 2-L PEG with AA in terms of adequate SBVQ for SBCE. One liter-PEG with AA can be recommended as the standard method for bowel cleansing for SBCE.
7.A Novel Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitor, 4-FHA, Improves Scopolamine-Induced Cognitive and Memory Impairment in Mice
Jee-Yeon SEO ; Jisoo KIM ; Yong-Hyun KO ; Bo-Ram LEE ; Kwang-Hyun HUR ; Young Hoon JUNG ; Hyun-Ju PARK ; Seok-Yong LEE ; Choon-Gon JANG
Biomolecules & Therapeutics 2025;33(2):268-277
Although histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is considered a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its role in cholinergic dysfunction in AD patients remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of (E)-3-(2-(4-fluorostyryl)thiazol-4-yl)-N-hydroxypropanamide (4-FHA), a new synthetic HDAC6 inhibitor, on cognitive and memory impairments in a scopolamine-induced-AD mouse model. Behaviorally, 4-FHA improved scopolamine-induced memory impairments in the Y-maze, passive avoidance, and Morris water maze tests. In addition, 4-FHA ameliorated scopolamine-induced cognitive impairments in the novel object recognition and place recognition tests. Furthermore, 4-FHA increased acetylation of α-tubulin (a major HDAC6 substrate); the expression of BDNF; and the phosphorylation of ERK 1/2, CREB, and ChAT in the hippocampus of scopolamine-treated mice. In summary, according to our data 4-FHA, an HDAC6 inhibitor, improved the cognitive and memory deficits of the AD mouse model by normalizing BDNF signaling and synaptic transmission, suggesting that 4-FHA might be a potential therapeutic candidate for AD.
8.Surgical Outcomes of Weight-Bearing Shoulders:Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Su Cheol KIM ; Hyun Gon KIM ; Young Girl RHEE ; Sung Min RHEE ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Du-Han KIM ; Hee Dong LEE ; Jae Chul YOO
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2025;17(3):438-452
Background:
This study aimed to report the short- and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in weight-bearing shoulders.
Methods:
This retrospective multicenter study included 19 cases of ARCR and 10 cases of RSA performed in weight-bearing shoulders from 2009 to 2021. In the ARCR group, postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the tendon integrity. In the RSA group, scapular notching, acromial fracture, and implant failure were assessed using plain radiographs, and complications were recorded. In both groups, preoperative and postoperative range of motion and functional scores were documented, along with subjective satisfaction and arm use for weight-bearing on the shoulders. For patients followed up for > 5 years, a midterm analysis was performed.
Results:
The ARCR group included 8 men and 11 women (average age, 58.8 ± 8.0 years). Initially, Patte types 1, 2, and 3 were noted in 9, 8, and 2 patients, respectively, and 4 patients exhibited full-thickness subscapularis tears. Four patients showed supraspinatus retear, and 2 patients showed subscapularis retear. Retear of any rotator cuff was observed in 5 patients (26.3%). Twelve patients were followed up for > 5 years; 11 (91.7%) used their operated arm for weight-bearing and 9 (75.0%) were satisfied. The RSA group included 5 men and 5 women (average age, 74.3 ± 7.9 years). Procedures included RSAs for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 6), osteoarthritis (n = 3), and fracture nonunion (n = 1). No cases of dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or disassociation were observed throughout the follow-up. However, 1 patient required implant removal due to infection, and 4 patients showed stage 1 scapular notching. Five patients were followed up for > 5 years, all of whom expressed satisfaction and used their operated arms for weight-bearing, despite mean forward flexion (107.5° ± 12.6°) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (61.5 ± 5.3) being less than reported patient acceptable symptomatic state (110° and 76, respectively).
Conclusions
Both ARCR and RSA showed promising outcomes in terms of weight-bearing on the operated arm and subjective satisfaction at short- and midterm follow-up. Therefore, neither of these surgeries should be considered contraindicated for patients with weight-bearing shoulder conditions.
9.Comparing 1-L and 2-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chang Kyo OH ; Sang Pyo LEE ; Jae Gon LEE ; Young Joo YANG ; Seung In SEO ; Chang Seok BANG ; Yu Jin KIM ; Woon Geon SHIN ; Jin Bae KIM ; Hyun Joo JANG ; Sea Hyub KAE ; Gwang Ho BAIK ; Hallym Gastrointestinal Study Group
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):87-94
Background/Aims:
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has become the standard for initial evaluation in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions. Although optimal visualization of the mucosa is important, patients experience difficulty in consuming a large volume of bowel preparation agents. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 1-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (AA) and 2-L PEG with AA.
Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority study, patients who received SBCE were randomly assigned to consume 1-L PEG with AA or 2-L PEG with AA for small bowel preparation. The primary outcome was adequate small bowel visibility quality (SBVQ). The secondary outcomes included diagnostic yield, cecal complete rate, and adverse events.
Results:
One hundred and forty patients were enrolled in this study, 70 patients per group. In the per-protocol analysis, there were no significant differences in the adequate SBVQ rate (94.0% vs 94.3%; risk difference, –0.3; 95% confidence interval, –8.1 to 7.6; p=1.000), diagnostic yield rate (49.3% vs 48.6%, p=0.936), or cecal complete rate (88.1% vs 92.9%, p=0.338) between the 1-L PEG with AA group and 2-L PEG with AA group. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.9% vs 11.9%, p=0.871).
Conclusions
One liter-PEG with AA is not inferior to 2-L PEG with AA in terms of adequate SBVQ for SBCE. One liter-PEG with AA can be recommended as the standard method for bowel cleansing for SBCE.
10.Erratum: Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Nationwide Survey on Surgically Treated Gastric Cancers in 2023
Dong Jin KIM ; Jeong Ho SONG ; Ji-Hyeon PARK ; Sojung KIM ; Sin Hye PARK ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Kyunghye BANG ; Chung-sik GONG ; Sung Eun OH ; Yoo Min KIM ; Young Suk PARK ; Jeesun KIM ; Ji Eun JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Bang Wool EOM ; Ki Bum PARK ; Jae Hun CHUNG ; Sang-Il LEE ; Young-Gil SON ; Dae Hoon KIM ; Sang Hyuk SEO ; Sejin LEE ; Won Jun SEO ; Dong Jin PARK ; Yoonhong KIM ; Jin-Jo KIM ; Ki Bum PARK ; In CHO ; Hye Seong AHN ; Sung Jin OH ; Ju-Hee LEE ; Hayemin LEE ; Seong Chan GONG ; Changin CHOI ; Ji-Ho PARK ; Eun Young KIM ; Chang Min LEE ; Jong Hyuk YUN ; Seung Jong OH ; Eunju LEE ; Seong-A JEONG ; Jung-Min BAE ; Jae-Seok MIN ; Hyun-dong CHAE ; Sung Gon KIM ; Daegeun PARK ; Dong Baek KANG ; Hogoon KIM ; Seung Soo LEE ; Sung Il CHOI ; Seong Ho HWANG ; Su-Mi KIM ; Moon Soo LEE ; Sang Hyun KIM ; Sang-Ho JEONG ; Yusung YANG ; Yonghae BAIK ; Sang Soo EOM ; Inho JEONG ; Yoon Ju JUNG ; Jong-Min PARK ; Jin Won LEE ; Jungjai PARK ; Ki Han KIM ; Kyung-Goo LEE ; Jeongyeon LEE ; Seongil OH ; Ji Hun PARK ; Jong Won KIM ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):400-402

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail