Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore and deeply understand the essential meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea. Methods: This study applied Colaizzi‘s phenomenological research method to identify the meanings and needs related to health care management experienced by international students during their academic stay in Korea. Data were collected through unstructured interviews, in which open-ended questions were asked to 12 international students. The interviews were conducted from May 10, 2024, to the end of July 2024, followed by an analysis based on Colaizzi’s six-step approach. The criteria set by Lincoln and Guba were used to enhance the reliability and validity of qualitative research. Results: Regarding the meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea, this study identified four categories, 11 themes, 27 sub-themes, and 108 significant statements. The four categories of international students' health care management experiences were: “neglecting health care management due to unresolved economic difficulties,” “choosing better healthcare management options than those in their home country,” “acquiring a new perspective on healthcare management during their stay in Korea,” and “suggesting directions for improvement and expectations based on their healthcare management experiences in Korea.” This study enabled an understanding of health management practices, with implications for ensuring the successful academic lives of international students. Conclusion This study implies that a deep understanding of international students' healthcare management experiences would contribute to the development of effective health promotion policies and programs for them in the future.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore and deeply understand the essential meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea. Methods: This study applied Colaizzi‘s phenomenological research method to identify the meanings and needs related to health care management experienced by international students during their academic stay in Korea. Data were collected through unstructured interviews, in which open-ended questions were asked to 12 international students. The interviews were conducted from May 10, 2024, to the end of July 2024, followed by an analysis based on Colaizzi’s six-step approach. The criteria set by Lincoln and Guba were used to enhance the reliability and validity of qualitative research. Results: Regarding the meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea, this study identified four categories, 11 themes, 27 sub-themes, and 108 significant statements. The four categories of international students' health care management experiences were: “neglecting health care management due to unresolved economic difficulties,” “choosing better healthcare management options than those in their home country,” “acquiring a new perspective on healthcare management during their stay in Korea,” and “suggesting directions for improvement and expectations based on their healthcare management experiences in Korea.” This study enabled an understanding of health management practices, with implications for ensuring the successful academic lives of international students. Conclusion This study implies that a deep understanding of international students' healthcare management experiences would contribute to the development of effective health promotion policies and programs for them in the future.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore and deeply understand the essential meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea. Methods: This study applied Colaizzi‘s phenomenological research method to identify the meanings and needs related to health care management experienced by international students during their academic stay in Korea. Data were collected through unstructured interviews, in which open-ended questions were asked to 12 international students. The interviews were conducted from May 10, 2024, to the end of July 2024, followed by an analysis based on Colaizzi’s six-step approach. The criteria set by Lincoln and Guba were used to enhance the reliability and validity of qualitative research. Results: Regarding the meaning of international students' healthcare management experiences in Korea, this study identified four categories, 11 themes, 27 sub-themes, and 108 significant statements. The four categories of international students' health care management experiences were: “neglecting health care management due to unresolved economic difficulties,” “choosing better healthcare management options than those in their home country,” “acquiring a new perspective on healthcare management during their stay in Korea,” and “suggesting directions for improvement and expectations based on their healthcare management experiences in Korea.” This study enabled an understanding of health management practices, with implications for ensuring the successful academic lives of international students. Conclusion This study implies that a deep understanding of international students' healthcare management experiences would contribute to the development of effective health promotion policies and programs for them in the future.